Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from libraries.ent, removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it in the jmx mini-project I get BUILD FAILED jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic-tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not found. just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? thanks david jencks On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
What does the property and path definition looks like? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from libraries.ent, removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it in the jmx mini-project I get BUILD FAILED jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not found. just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? thanks david jencks On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
Well, here's the file. david On 2002.09.27 18:13:55 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: What does the property and path definition looks like? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from libraries.ent, removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it in the jmx mini-project I get BUILD FAILED jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not found. just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? thanks david jencks On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development libraries.ent Description: Binary data
RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
It is possible that the behavior has changed since ant 1.2. You might try using path location=/ instead. Otherwise I don't know. I am working on some ideas for fixing all of this mess right now. The build system has grown and now there are a few more projects going on... so I have bumped up this on my priorities. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Well, here's the file. david On 2002.09.27 18:13:55 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: What does the property and path definition looks like? --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from libraries.ent, removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it in the jmx mini-project I get BUILD FAILED jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not found. just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? thanks david jencks On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
I did not know that. Do we care about all the library available tasks? The take no time, but print a lot of stuff during build. If we do care, do you want to make the change Jason? Otherwise, I can. -dain Jason Dillon wrote: The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect JBossCMP JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
