OK, I will backport it to 3.2 (not sure about doing it for 3.0)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Scott M Stark
Envoyé : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 09:23
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re:
[JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Seems like a rather independent feature that can't cause any
harm. 3.2 is fine as
is 3.0 as long as there truly are no backward compatibility
issues with existing
services.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-Dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:48 PM
Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re:
[JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Scott,
Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
