Re: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Seems like a rather independent feature that can't cause any harm. 3.2 is fine as is 3.0 as long as there truly are no backward compatibility issues with existing services. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD Scott, Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0? Cheers, Sacha --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
OK, I will backport it to 3.2 (not sure about doing it for 3.0) -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott M Stark Envoyé : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 09:23 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD Seems like a rather independent feature that can't cause any harm. 3.2 is fine as is 3.0 as long as there truly are no backward compatibility issues with existing services. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD Scott, Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0? Cheers, Sacha --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Scott, Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0? Cheers, Sacha -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Adam Heath Envoye : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 06:47 A : Jboss-Dev Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote: OK, I've just tested and the russian doll feature wasn't working with .bsh files. It is now fixed. Furthermore, I just tested this case: I added a xxx.bsh file inside a ejb.jar file. Result: the deployment process respect the create/start/stop/destroy steps i.e. you have this sequence: - create bsh script - create ejbs - start bsh script - start ejbs - ... and so on. So it works. Hmm. Most excellent. I really wish the J2EE spec had features that allowed for some kind of user-supplied code to be ran when items were deployed. Having this feature in JBoss is going to rock. Is it possible to have this back-ported to 3.0? My gut instinct says this wouldn't require modifications to the jboss code itself, but I may be wrong. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Beanshell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-users --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
