[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: JGroups 2.4 release date

2006-10-31 Thread annecotter
Sorry, just noticed the following post from Brian on Oct. 30 that says JGroups 
2.4 should be released in within a week:

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Ah, I forgot.  The 
-Djgroups.marshalling.compatible=true fix was added after 2.4.CR2.  So you'd 
need to check out JGroups HEAD and build it, or wait for 2.4.GA, which should 
be out within a week.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982101#3982101

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982101
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - JGroups 2.4 release date

2006-10-31 Thread annecotter
Is there a new release date for JGroups 2.4?  On the wiki it says the target 
date was July 2006.  

Thanks

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982090#3982090

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982090
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Does clustering require traffic over 1098 as well as 118

2006-07-24 Thread annecotter
JGroups config:

  |  
  | 
  | ${jboss.partition.name:5620SAMPartition_SAM_4_0_B2_16}
  | 
  | ${jboss.bind.address}
  | 
  | False
  | 
  | 3
  | 
  | 
  |   
  |   
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  |   
  | 
  |   
  | 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3960516#3960516

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3960516
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Does clustering require traffic over 1098 as well as 118

2006-07-24 Thread annecotter

Thanks for the answer Brian.  

I have two machines with multiple interfaces.  Clustering traffic is configured 
to go over bge2, and all other traffic (JNDI/RMI/JMS) is over bge1.  If the two 
machines don't have IP connectivity over bge1 I get the following messages when 
a new member joins the cluster:

2006.07.21 12:51:20 WARN  [org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK] [dino2:11800 
(additional data: 17 bytes)] discarded message from non-member 10.10.10.10:11800

When the two machines can see each other over bge1 (as well as bge2),  
clustering works fine.  In this case when a new member joins the cluster, I see 
traffic over 1098 at the beginning of the join.  This is why I was suspecting 
RMI calls between the servers.  Am I missing any obvious reasons why the first 
case doesn't work?  What causes my second machine (10.10.10.10) to go from 
being a non-member, to being considered a member so that the first machine 
won't discard it's messages?

Thanks
Anne 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3960484#3960484

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3960484
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Does clustering require traffic over 1098 as well as 118

2006-07-21 Thread annecotter
Hi Marc,  thank you I have seen that document.   I wonder if I haven't phrased 
my question well, but what I'm trying to find out is when a new member joins a 
cluster, does it make an RMI call to the existing member?  So do the members of 
a cluster use RMI for any communication with each other?  

thanks
Anne

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3959964#3959964

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3959964
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Does clustering require traffic over 1098 as well as 11800?

2006-07-20 Thread annecotter
I apologize if this is a basic question, but I cannot find a clear answer in 
any of the documentation.  I have JGroups configured to use TCP.  I notice that 
when a new member joins the cluster, there seems to be traffic generated from 
port 1098, as well as the expected JGroups traffic on 11800.  Is there an RMI 
call made when a new member joins the cluster?  I'm suspecting this is how the 
new member registers itself with the existing member's HA partition?

Any info would be much appreciated, thank you in advance.

regards,
Anne

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3959602#3959602

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3959602
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user