[jboss-user] [JBoss OSGi Users] - OSGi Bundle clustered (farming) deployment ?
Hi guys and hi Ales, it's been a while :) I've been kind of away from the JBoss world for some time and digging more into the OSGi/Spring world out of frustration from JBoss not clearly embracing OSGi, a little more than a year ago. But recently I stumbled upon JBoss OSGi again and was really pleased to discover that JBoss had finally stepped in for good into OSGi. Not only have you gotten pretty far into implementing an OSGi container on top of MC but also integrating existing third party OSGi containers into JBoss AS which is really a smart move. Everyone can now find a suitable match. What drove me into studying alternative OSGi deployment platforms is the need for clustered deployment of bundles. There is Paremus Infiniflow which does exactly that and much more but their deployment model is way too complicated for the average company. SpringSource DM Server 2 will support it in some way but's it's not yet really clear how/when. And both SpringSource DM Server and Paremus are not currently on CTO radars whereas JBoss already is. At the end of the day, I'm looking for a simple way to deploy bundles to a cluster of OSGi containers. JBoss farming does exactly that with J2EE deployables but will all deployables supported by JBoss MC support distributed deployment (farming) ? And more specifically, are/will OSGi bundle farming be supported ? Regarding OSGi, will farming be supported both when JBoss MC is the underlying OSGi implementation and when third party OSGi such as Equinox and Felix are used ? Kind regards, Cédric Vidal http://blog.proxiad.com View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4261842#4261842 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4261842 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Installation, Configuration Deployment] - Re: JBossAS 4.0.5-GA dependency libraries version info relea
I just saw your answer, thanx a lot for the information, it's very valuable. Regards, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3991343#3991343 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3991343 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Installation, Configuration Deployment] - JBossAS 4.0.5-GA dependency libraries version info release n
Hi guys, could you please point me to a place where I could find a listing of all JBoss 4.0.5-GA dependencies and especially their versions ? More generally, this information would be very helpfull for all JBoss releases. For most jars, neither the filename nor the MANIFEST indicates version info. Most jars have no version info in the filename. I know this is avoided on purpose which is fine with me but the problem is that for most jars even their MANIFEST version headers are forged. Sometimes, it is the right original version with an additionnal JBoss information: Manifest-Version: 1.0 | Specification-Title: Commons Logging | Created-By: 1.4.2_09-b05 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) | Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 | Implementation-Title: JBoss commons logging patch | Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation | Specification-Version: 1.0 | Implementation-Vendor-Id: http://www.jboss.org/ | Implementation-Version: 1.0.5.GA-jboss | Implementation-Vendor: JBoss Inc. | Implementation-URL: http://www.jboss.org/ | | Name: org.apache.commons.logging | Specification-Version: 1.0 | Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation | Implementation-Version: 1.0.5.GA-jboss | Implementation-Vendor: JBoss Inc. This is fine with me because you can guess the original version of the dependency, here it seems to be commons-logging-1.0.5, but most of the time, the version header is equal to the version of the JBoss release which leaves me in the dark: Manifest-Version: 1.0 | Specification-Title: JBoss | JarJarStringTransformer: com.tonicsystems.jarjar.GeneratedStringTransf | ormer | Created-By: 1.4.2_05-b04 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) | Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.2 | Implementation-Title: JBoss [Zion] | Specification-Vendor: JBoss (http://www.jboss.org/) | Specification-Version: 4.0.5.GA | Implementation-Vendor-Id: http://www.jboss.org/ | Implementation-Version: 4.0.5.GA (build: CVSTag=Branch_4_0 date=200610 | 162339) | Implementation-Vendor: JBoss Inc. | Implementation-URL: http://www.jboss.org/ The previous MANIFEST was extracted from 4.0.5.GA/server/ejb3/lib/cglib.jar, this is absolutely not clear in the MANIFEST. Thanx for your time, Regards, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3987900#3987900 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3987900 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - Re: SpringDeployer compatible with Spring2.0 final
Hi Ales, That's great news ! and thanx for the credit :) Kind regards, Cédric Vidal PS: Looking forward to the jndiName attribute removal ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3979503#3979503 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3979503 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
alesj wrote : A single default jndi name isn't ok - since once you deploy more that one SpringDeployer app - it would put all BeanFactories under the same jndi name - not what we want. You're right, that's fine with me. alesj wrote : It should be more deployment specific - something similar to EJB3 stuff for persistence context - single persistence context doesn't reqiure unit name. That would be great. alesj wrote : But working on to it. Looking forward it ;) Regards, Cédric View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3979059#3979059 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3979059 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - Re: New feature proposal: byType injection of Spring beans
Great, glad to hear that :D View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3974779#3974779 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3974779 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - Re: New feature proposal: byType injection of Spring beans
Hi Ales,
Here is a quick and dirty patch. I just couldn't wait :) I didn't have the time
to figure out how the jboss unit tests work though, so I didn't add any unit
tests. If you could just explain that to me quickly, I'd be glad to add them.
The code tries to do as much guess-work as possible and i'm not sure if it's
the best way to do it. The algorithm used is explained in the code.
Tell me if it suits you.
Regards,
Cédric
| Index:
spring-int/src/main/org/jboss/spring/support/SpringInjectionSupport.java
| ===
| ---
spring-int/src/main/org/jboss/spring/support/SpringInjectionSupport.java
(revision 57255)
| +++
spring-int/src/main/org/jboss/spring/support/SpringInjectionSupport.java
(working copy)
| @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
| import org.jboss.logging.Logger;
| import org.jboss.naming.Util;
| import org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanFactory;
| +import org.springframework.beans.factory.ListableBeanFactory;
| import org.springframework.util.Assert;
|
| import java.lang.reflect.Field;
| @@ -111,30 +112,101 @@
| return m.getName().startsWith(set)
m.getParameterTypes().length == 1;
| }
|
| -private Object getObjectFromBeanFactory(Spring spring) throws Exception
| +private Object getObjectFromBeanFactory(Spring spring, String
defaultBeanName, Class type) throws Exception
| {
| BeanFactory beanFactory = (BeanFactory)
Util.lookup(spring.jndiName(), BeanFactory.class);
| -return beanFactory.getBean(spring.bean());
| +return getObjectFromBeanFactory(spring, beanFactory,
defaultBeanName, type);
| }
|
| +private Object getObjectFromBeanFactory(Spring spring, BeanFactory
beanFactory, String defaultBeanName, Class type) {
| + Object bean = null;
| +
| + if(spring.bean() != null spring.bean().length() 0) {
| +
| + /*
| +* If the bean name is specified in the annotation,
then the bean
| +* must looked up by name whether the bean factory is
listable or
| +* not.
| +*/
| + bean = beanFactory.getBean(spring.bean());
| +
| + } else {
| + if (beanFactory instanceof ListableBeanFactory) {
| +
| + /*
| +* If no bean name is specified in the
annotation but the bean
| +* factory is listable then the bean is looked
up by type.
| +*/
| + ListableBeanFactory listableBeanFactory =
(ListableBeanFactory) beanFactory;
| + Map beans =
listableBeanFactory.getBeansOfType(type);
| +
| + if(beans.size() 1) {
| +
| + /*
| +* If there is a ambiguity, try with
the default name
| +*/
| + bean = beans.get(defaultBeanName);
| +
| + /*
| +* If no beans amongst the ones of the
expected type has the
| +* default name then we can't do
anything.
| +*/
| + if(bean == null) {
| + throw new
IllegalArgumentException(More than one bean is of type + type);
| + }
| +
| + } else {
| + Iterator beansIterator =
beans.values().iterator();
| + if(beansIterator.hasNext()) {
| + bean = beansIterator.next();
| + }
| + }
| +
| + } else {
| +
| + /*
| +* If no bean name is specified in the
annotation and the bean
| +* factory is not listable then the bean can
only be looked up
| +* by its default name.
| +*/
| + bean = beanFactory.getBean(defaultBeanName);
| +
| + }
| + }
| + return bean;
| +}
| +
| private void injectToMethod(Object target, Method method, Spring
spring) throws Exception
| {
| -Object bean = getObjectFromBeanFactory(spring);
| + String defaultBeanName = getDefaultBeanName(method);
| +Object bean = getObjectFromBeanFactory(spring, defaultBeanName,
method.getReturnType());
| doAssert(bean,
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - Re: New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped d
Something went wrong with the thread title, it was meant to be called: anonymous wrote : New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped default Spring bean factory JNDI name. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3974906#3974906 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3974906 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - New feature proposal: Add injection interceptor scoped defau
Today, you have to specify the spring bean factory's JNDI name in each @Spring annotation: @Spring(jndiName=myApp, bean=SomeBean) | private SomeBeanClass pojo; But most spring based applications use only one bean factory, so it would be very convenient as much as less verbose (I'm lazy ;) ) to be able to specify the default JNDI name of the bean factory in one place. One such place could the SpringInjectionInterceptor. The JNDI name could of course be overriden on a per annotation basis. The default JNDI name could be specified in ejb3-interceptors-aop.xml the following way: interceptor class=org.jboss.spring.interceptor.SpringInjectionInterceptor | !-- optionnal Spring bean factory default JNDI name -- | attribute name=defaultJndiNamemyApp/attribute | /interceptor | | bind pointcut=execution(*-new(..)) |interceptor-ref name=org.jboss.spring.interceptor.SpringInjectionInterceptor/ | /bind We then could avoid specifying the jndiName in the annotation: @Spring(bean=SomeBean) | private SomeBeanClass pojo; What do you think ? Regards, Cédric View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3974904#3974904 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3974904 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss/Spring Integration] - New feature proposal: byType injection of Spring beans
Hi guys, The current JBoss Spring integration seems to support only byName injection, it would be great if it could support also byType injection. ByType injection of dependencies is a very powerfull feature of Spring, and it would be great if it could be leveraged in the JBoss Spring integration. ByType injection could be attempted by the SpringInjectionSupport whenever the bean attribute of the Spring annotation is missing. @Spring(jndiName = spring-pojo) | private IntCreator intCreator; This feature is restricted to BeanFactory instances which are ListableBeanFactory though. In this case, the method to call is: Map ListableBeanFactory#getBeansOfType(Class type) throws BeansException; The only difficulty with this kind of injection is if more than one bean is of the expected type. The behavior to follow in that case is described here: http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/beans.html#beans-factory-autowire Is anybody else interested by that functionality ? Kind regards ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3974603#3974603 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3974603 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Custom fork - jbpm 3
Hi, I'm also interested by the answer to this :) I'm trying to achieve the exact same purpose. Tchao View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3958271#3958271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3958271 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
