[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: Maximum XMX value on 32bit Windows Machine

2009-04-29 Thread ntnlljboss
Thank you again Peter,
always fast and accurate.

Antonello

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4227415#4227415

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4227415
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Maximum XMX value on 32bit Windows Machine

2009-04-28 Thread ntnlljboss
Goodmorning,
I'have some problems while setting the XMX JM value bigger than 1300m.

When i set 1400 or 1500m the error returned by the run.sh is:
---
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Could not reserve enough space for object heap
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
---

The o.s. is Windows Server 2003 32bit with this memory usage

Total Physical Memory   16,383.08 MB
Available Physical Memory   10.37 GB
Total Virtual Memory23.41 GB
Available Virtual Memory13.21 GB

the server has more than 10GB of free physical memory. Searching google i found 
that the problem maybe is a limit in the address space on the 32bit version of 
Windows Server 2003. Is really possibile that i can't start JV istance with an 
XMX value bigger than 1300m?

I have not experience with jb...@windows 32, any suggestion appreciated

Thanks in advance
Antonello


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4227148#4227148

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4227148
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: Physical vs Virtual Memory

2009-04-28 Thread ntnlljboss
Yes, you are right, Sysinternal ProceXp displays the real working set that 
reaches 900MB
Thank you !

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4227135#4227135

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4227135
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: Physical vs Virtual Memory

2009-04-28 Thread ntnlljboss
First of all, thanks for you answer.
You are right, I also think that's a problem of memory allocation in Windows 
Server. I just tried to set the page file size to 0, but JV refuse to start.
Is very strange:
when the OOME errors occurs and the overloaded JavaService process hangs, the 
paging file usage peak is 100%, but the "peak mem usage" value of task manager 
is always 512MB for all JavaService processes! It seems that windows does not 
use more thank 512MB (the exact value of maxpermsize), nerver! I'm a bit 
frustrated, i read all 73 pages of this forum and searched all the web without 
find any answer.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4227005#4227005

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4227005
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Re: Physical vs Virtual Memory

2009-04-27 Thread ntnlljboss
the posted configuration is wrong, this is the actual configuration:

-Xmn256m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=512m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m 
-XX:+UseParallelGC

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4226860#4226860

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4226860
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [Performance Tuning] - Physical vs Virtual Memory

2009-04-27 Thread ntnlljboss
Good morning,
i'm configuring JBoss 4.0.2 on Windows Server 2003 and i have a lot of problem 
concerning the memory managment. On this server are configured 10 VM for JBoss 
instances with this configuration:

-Xmn1024m -Xms1024m -Xmx1100m -XX:PermSize=512m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m 
-XX:+UseParallelGC

The server seem to allocate VM reserved XMX memory (1024MB*10) in the virtual 
memory instead on the physical memory. Only the MaxPermSize space (512*10) seem 
to be loaded in RAM, indeed, the related JBoss process use only 512MB of system 
physical memory. This results in an high swap file utilization, very low 
physical memory usage and in frequent OOME error. The paging usage peak is at 
100% and the memory usage is always on 60% of 16GB avalaible.
I'm googling without find anything regarding. What's wrong?
Thanks in advance
Antonello




View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4226845#4226845

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4226845
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user