[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you see in EJB3) You can still reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you need to. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022461#4022461 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022461 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
So it is not really a question of EJB3/JPA or Hibernate, but which implementation of EJB3/JPA are you going to use. So in the examples, the ones that say are using EJB3/JPA, yes they are following the spec, but its implementation is Hibernate. Hibernate implements EJB3/JPA plus it add much much more on top of it. Mark View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022569#4022569 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022569 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you see in EJB3) You can still reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you need to. QFE. I prefer JPA over EJB3 but for simple reason that I run my software stack on Resin which isn't exactly EJB3 compatible atm. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4022746#4022746 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4022746 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
