jacek187 wrote :
| In my opinion TreeCache is yet NOT READY for production use. Probably it
works in simple single-thread applications, but in real situations, with many
concurent threads TreeCache dosen't work correctly...
|
No, more specifically, it IS ready for production use in multi threaded
systems, but cleary does NOT behave well when used with a transaction manager
that cleans up timed out transactions in a separate thread - specifically
WebLogic's TM. This is evident in some of the JIRAs you have raised (such as
JBCACHE-923).
The solution to this problem is unfortunately not that straightforward, since
locks in JBC are obtained either on the Thread (in the case of non-tx
operation) or a GlobalTransaction (in the case of running within a tx).
Implicit in the design is that only one thread would ever use a
GlobalTransaction object at a given time, and this is where it all breaks down
when you have a TM that performs rollbacks in a separate thread. It opens up
the possibility for the TM to be trying to obtain locks on a node to roll back,
while your app thread tries to obtain locks on the same node to write to it.
This WILL be allowed since they both pertain to the same GlobalTransaction
object.
Jacek, I'd recommend joining the JBoss Cache dev mail list - we will be
discussing this problem in more detail there.
Cheers,
Manik
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4085034#4085034
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4085034
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user