[jboss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Scalability

2007-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the largest clusters I've seen (with 1.4.x) has been with close to 50 
instances, but that''s using async replication.

If you want sync replication, and you can guarantee session affinity, I'd 
recommend buddy replication since this scales very well compared to total 
replication.

Hopefully in the near future we'll have a much more scalable replication 
mechanism http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossCachePartitioning


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4098809#4098809

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4098809
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Scalability

2007-10-25 Thread FredrikJ
We are currently running 4 nodes with synchronous replication of rather large 
data objects. (The replication is done within a transaction.)

The objects replicated are from 1k up to about 8k bytes large. These 4 nodes 
currently handle up to 5000 events/second which would translate into 1250 
replications per second and node. (Note: I would really like to try PojoCache 
here for a more fine grained replication. )

We are constantly trying new jgroups stacks and so forth, but currently it 
seems like we get better performance with TCP. Buddy replication also helped 
alot (1 buddy per node). 

We also run a cache shared by 8 nodes which is updated more then 5k/s, but that 
cache carries only small data and is updated asynchronously and is batched.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4098811#4098811

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4098811
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user


[jboss-user] [JBossCache] - Re: Scalability

2007-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will find that TCP is much faster when it comes to buddy replication, since 
replication is unicast to target buddies rather than the entire cluster.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4098880#4098880

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4098880
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user