[jboss-user] [JBossMQ] - Re: Can the Code get a QueueConnection objcect per request
Hi Adrian i had a confusion as you said ConnectionFactory is for remote client connection and java:/JmsXA is for pooled/transacted within container apps. does this mean that we cannot leverage JMS connection pooling of JBOSS from standalone Java clients ? IS there any way we could have a pooling mechanisms for JMS connections or sessions for standalone java class. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4221261#4221261 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4221261 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [JBossMQ] - Re: Can the Code get a QueueConnection objcect per request
Remote access to a pool is an anti-pattern. The serverside JMS semantics are different to client semantics anyway. Either create the pool inside the client (although for a normal java client its better to just create one connection and then create session as required - e.g. per thread) Or use an SLSB to give remote access, there's an old example of such an EJB on the WIKI. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4221320#4221320 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4221320 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
