[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
bob.mcwhirter wrote : | Yah, I looked at that too. Though, that requires extending the ModificationType enumeration and registering a ModificationAction. Non-trivial to try out a different ModificationAction, it would seem. | | Perhaps a ModificationType.ATTACHED and go looking for a ModificationAction.class attachment if set? | I don't think it makes sense to go that far, we just need to cover all useful cases, as I think there are not that many of them. Apart from your case + the one's we already have, I can't think of another one. :-) bob.mcwhirter wrote : | Yah, I think they all work as expected, just not a complete set from my POV. I did see some examples with an UNPACK on the root, but that seems to be non-tenable. UNPACK only works on child context-infos from the look of it. Else, the isNested() check stops it on the root without doing anything if you point it at the root deployed archive, not a nested archive. | Yes, unpack is only meant for nested jars. bob.mcwhirter wrote : | I'll poke around, but I should be able to tell the difference between foo.jar as a real directory and foo.jar as a mounted vfszip? | From VFS no. We already had this dev discussion, and afaik Scott had some good arguments. In the worst case you can do this: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/trunk/system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/profile/basic/MetaDataAwareProfile.java See hasBeenModified. bob.mcwhirter wrote : | I can still do a byte-for-byte copy of a vfszip-mounted JAR? | Sure. bob.mcwhirter wrote : | I'll work on an implementation. | + tests. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193933#4193933 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193933 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
We already have this. ;-) You can define this in jboss-structure.xml. Its context element takes modification attribute. It can either be temp, unpack or explode: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-deployers/trunk/deployers-core-spi/src/main/java/org/jboss/deployers/spi/structure/ModificationType.java Dunno how will this fix URLs issues, as they will still remain VFS urls. Refs are correctly re-wired, deployers have no knowledge of any modification. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193823#4193823 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193823 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
alesj wrote : Its context element takes modification attribute. | Eventually this is part of ContextInfo, so you can pre-determine this yourself. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193824#4193824 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193824 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
Yah, if the top-level deployment isn't bundled up in an archive, I can assume it's filesystem-based and can do vfsFile.toURL().getFile(). It might be somewhat evil, but it works for me so far. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193827#4193827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193827 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
I'm finding this difficult to get right... If I use TEMP, it seems to just copy my archive into tmp/ as a single file. If I use EXPLODE, it recursively explodes my archive, along with any .jar contained within. This upsets jruby, because it expects foo.jar to be a jarfile, not a directory. If I use UNPACK, nothing happens. The UnpackCopyMechanism gives up at the root level, since it's testing if it's nested inside something else. What I effectively want is just a top-level un-jarring. as if I'd done jar xvf myapp.rails and deposited the results into tmp/myapp-tmp/... My RailsStructure is creating a ContextInfo attached to the StructureContext, and setting the modification type upon it. Should I instead be also creating a ContextInfo for each top-level child I want slurped out of my archive? Thanks, -Bob View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193877#4193877 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193877 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
bob.mcwhirter wrote : I'm finding this difficult to get right... | There might not be the modification type you're looking for. But it's easy to add what ever you want. ;-) And I also see types behave as I expected. :-) You're welcome to impl top == 'I effectively want is just a top-level un-jarring'. And I'll add it to VFS 2.0.1. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193895#4193895 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193895 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Autoexplosion of archives
alesj wrote : | There might not be the modification type you're looking for. | But it's easy to add what ever you want. ;-) | Yah, I looked at that too. Though, that requires extending the ModificationType enumeration and registering a ModificationAction. Non-trivial to try out a different ModificationAction, it would seem. Perhaps a ModificationType.ATTACHED and go looking for a ModificationAction.class attachment if set? alesj wrote : | And I also see types behave as I expected. :-) | Yah, I think they all work as expected, just not a complete set from my POV. I did see some examples with an UNPACK on the root, but that seems to be non-tenable. UNPACK only works on child context-infos from the look of it. Else, the isNested() check stops it on the root without doing anything if you point it at the root deployed archive, not a nested archive. alesj wrote : | You're welcome to impl top == 'I effectively want is just a top-level un-jarring'. | And I'll add it to VFS 2.0.1. ;-) I'll poke around, but I should be able to tell the difference between foo.jar as a real directory and foo.jar as a mounted vfszip? I can still do a byte-for-byte copy of a vfszip-mounted JAR? I'll work on an implementation. Thanks! -Bob View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4193896#4193896 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4193896 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
