[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: ORA-01786: FOR UPDATE of this query expression is not al

2004-06-22 Thread cslenkey
Alex,

We use row-lockingfalse/row-locking setting in standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml as you 
can see in my comment at Jun 6, 2003 10:19 AM

Csaba

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839493#3839493

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839493


---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings  Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings  Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: ORA-01786: FOR UPDATE of this query expression is not al

2004-06-22 Thread cslenkey
Alex,

You are right! Mea culpa!

In standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml we use row-lockingfalse/row-locking
But in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml which is generated by the generator of Software Through 
Pictures application we generate TRUE
I was mindless...
Thx

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839501#3839501

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839501


---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings  Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings  Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: Q: why EJBQLs run cyclic slowly

2004-06-21 Thread cslenkey
Dear Alex,

I would like to respond to your message. Veranda is one of my collegaues who is out of 
office today. 
We have tried the 3.2.4RC2 and we could not use it.
I have opend a topich about our problem why we could not use 3.2.4:
http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=49936

Shortly: the new versions of JBoss genereates different SQL code. 
Oracle RDBMS can not interpret SELECT DISTINCT with FOR UPDATE and this is 
understandable. 3.2.2RC3 generates the same SQL code without FOR UPDATE clause, so our 
application runs fine in this version.

If we are able to run our applcation on 3.2.4 we can tune the cache size and policy as 
you recommended. 

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3839397#3839397

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3839397


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: ORA-01786: FOR UPDATE of this query expression is not al

2004-05-20 Thread cslenkey
Thanks for your answer.
Of course we use row-lockingfalse/row-locking setting.
That is the reason why I do not understand what has changed between the two versions.
Csaba

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835630#3835630

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835630


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Persistence CMP/JBoss] - Re: ORA-01786: FOR UPDATE of this query expression is not al

2004-05-20 Thread cslenkey
DISTINCT and FOR UPDATE are incompatible. This the reason of the Oracle-01786 error 
message. 
But why does generate different SQL code JBoss3.2.2RC and 3.2.4?

Can anyone help?
Csaba

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835684#3835684

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835684


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user