[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Embedded EJB3: NO TX DATASOURCE setup

2006-07-07 Thread fguerzoni
Nope.
I also tried to do it myself starting from source, but it was too difficult for 
my skills.

I want to share my experience:
my application (same .jar) can run either (1) on thick client (container 
embedded), or (2) distributed server (Tomcat + container embedded), or (3) 
company servers (Tomcat + jboss as + ejb3). Ejb3 makes it possible!

I decided not to use multiple datasources (or databases) within solution 1 & 2. 
This is not a workaround because every table can hosted by the same database as 
there are not scalability or performance issues. Doing so I get also a better 
manageability.
Where I need multiple database is within the third solution, where there will 
be lots of records.
I'm using mysql, so myisam performance gains are visible only within the third 
solution.

So, just think on what you really need.

In every case the original question is still open.

bye 
F

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956263#3956263

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956263

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Injecting EntityManager with an interceptor

2006-07-07 Thread fguerzoni
Are you sure you are interested in having the EntityManager created the first 
time the factory (singleton) is created? And then using that EM instance? I 
don't think EM is thread safe.

I had the same decision to take some time ago, and I preferred to pass EM as 
parameter to DAO class when calling static method. Doing so, I'm sure to pass 
the EM private to current thread.

More: I create a bunch of EM in my interceptors and I store them in threadlocal 
variables so to get visibility both in other interceptors and bean.
Every piece of code gets what it needs and passes it to DAO.
It's useful to put jboss classes on debug level in log4j conf. Doing that you 
could have a look at EM lifecycle.

Tell me what you think.
bye
F


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956252#3956252

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956252

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Default interceptors bad behaviour

2006-06-25 Thread fguerzoni
I think it's a bug.

My sample application Log is:

INFO  25-06 15:37:52,781 (EJB3StandaloneBootstrap.java:loadMBeanServer:408)  
-!!loadMBeanServer servers 0
INFO  25-06 15:37:52,781 (EJB3StandaloneBootstrap.java:loadMBeanServer:411)  
-!!loadMBeanServer creating...
WARN  25-06 15:37:53,453 (BeanSchemaBinding.java:init:227)  -You should use the 
2.0 version of the Microcontainer xml. xmlns='urn:jboss:bean-deployer:2.0'
INFO  25-06 15:37:54,953 (Ejb3DescriptorHandler.java:addClassAnnotation:1699)  
-adding class annotation javax.interceptor.Interceptors to 
org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.SampleBean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INFO  25-06 15:37:54,968 (Ejb3Deployment.java:create:467)  -EJB3 deployment 
time took: 609
INFO  25-06 15:37:55,000 (MCKernelAbstraction.java:install:84)  -installing 
bean: jboss.j2ee:jar=bin,name=SampleBean,service=EJB3 with dependencies:
INFO  25-06 15:37:55,312 (EJBContainer.java:start:553)  -STARTED EJB: 
org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.SampleBean ejbName: SampleBean
Starting
*** DefaultInterceptor intercepting sample
*** TracingInterceptor intercepting sample
*** SampleInterceptor intercepting sample
*** DefaultInterceptor intercepting sample
*** TracingInterceptor intercepting sample
sample called
*** TracingInterceptor invocation of 
org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.SampleBean.sample() took 0ms
*** DefaultInterceptor exiting
*** SampleInterceptor exiting
*** TracingInterceptor invocation of 
org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.SampleBean.sample() took 0ms
*** DefaultInterceptor exiting
Done


Why default interceptors  (DefaultInterceptor and TracingInterceptor) are 
called a second time after method interceptor (SampleInterceptor)?


Ejb-jar.xml content is





*


org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.DefaultInterceptor



org.jboss.tutorial.interceptor.bean.TracingInterceptor







Should I post to Jira?
Thanks in advance.
Regards


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953278#3953278

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3953278

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Performance for embedded alpha 8

2006-06-20 Thread fguerzoni
I noted a 10 second increasing on a total of 50 seconds when I switched from 
alfa6 to alfa8.

DEBUG 20-06 19:35:32,937 (KernelFactory.java:assembleNewKernel:86)  -Starting 
JBoss Kernel construction...
DEBUG 20-06 19:35:33,078 (KernelFactory.java:assembleNewKernel:112)  -Completed 
JBoss Kernel construction.  Duration: 125 milliseconds
INFO  20-06 19:35:33,078 (EJB3StandaloneBootstrap.java:loadMBeanServer:408)  
-!!loadMBeanServer servers 0
INFO  20-06 19:35:33,078 (EJB3StandaloneBootstrap.java:loadMBeanServer:411)  
-!!loadMBeanServer creating...
WARN  20-06 19:35:33,656 (BeanSchemaBinding.java:init:227)  -You should use the 
2.0 version of the Microcontainer xml. xmlns='urn:jboss:bean-deployer:2.0'
DEBUG 20-06 19:35:33,734 (BeanXMLDeployer.java:deploy:91)  -Parsing 
file:/D:/Eclipse%20Workspaces/SOA_EJB3/CBI_BE/bin/embedded-jboss-beans.xml took 
594 milliseconds
DEBUG 20-06 19:35:34,000 (UserTransactionImpl.java:start:61)  -new UserTx: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
INFO  20-06 19:35:34,078 (LocalTxDataSource.java:bindConnectionFactory:117)  
-Bound datasource to JNDI name 'java:/cbi_local_tx'
DEBUG 20-06 19:35:34,093 (BeanXMLDeployer.java:deploy:98)  -Deploying 
file:/D:/Eclipse%20Workspaces/SOA_EJB3/CBI_BE/bin/embedded-jboss-beans.xml took 
953 milliseconds
DEBUG 20-06 19:36:09,296 (JaccHelper.java:initialiseJacc:61)  -Initialising 
JACC Context for deployment: Cbi
DEBUG 20-06 19:36:09,625 (Ejb3AnnotationHandler.java:getContainers:164)  -found 
EJB3: ...
...


Watching the log I see that there's a 35 secs stop (cpu at 100%) just after the 
deploying of embedded-jboss-bean.xml (where there is an accurate time report) 
and before the JACC initialization.

I'm struggling to understand what those 35 secs are used for, as I think they 
will increase when increasing bean number. I hope not, because bootstrap can 
get very delayed.

I'm also thinking to break bean deploying on several pieces respecting 
dependencies and to load beans on request. But I have to work on it.

cheers
F

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3952096#3952096

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3952096


___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Default interceptors bad behaviour

2006-06-17 Thread fguerzoni
Win xp, jdk 1.5_04, EJB3 embeddable alfa8.

Default interceptors, specified in ejb-jar.xml file, are always called even 
after method interceptor.
Default interceptors, unless a different specified ordering, should be called 
before method interceptor.
Instead, from release alfa8 they are called both before and after.

I can provide sample code for this, maybe in Jira.

Regards
F

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951447#3951447

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951447


___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Intercepting output bean results

2006-06-17 Thread fguerzoni
I use EJB3 bean and interceptors in this way:

int. A (try block)
  int. B (try block)
   bean's method
  int. B (finally block)
int. A (finally block)

where in try block I do some checks on request and in finally block (after bean 
method execution) I do some other check on bean generated response.

Response is passed between interceptors and bean (and viceversa) using 
threadlocal data as explained in 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77276

Is it possible to make bean response visible to interceptors as it yet happens 
for parameeters? Doing so, bean's mthod semantic would be cleaner because 
there's no need to rely on additional code to export the response. I don't know 
if this feature is implemented, so I posted on forum.

thanks in advance
regards

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3951438#3951438

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3951438


___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Embedded EJB3: NO TX DATASOURCE setup

2006-03-07 Thread fguerzoni
Hi, does anyone knows how to set up a non transactional datasource inside 
embedded ejb3?

While it is possible to define a 
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local.LocalTxDataSource to bootstrap a TX DS, I 
still haven't found how to set up a non transactional datasource like the way 
I'm used to do with xml node  in *-ds.xml inside the 
container.

Any help will be appreciated.
regards
F



View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3928552#3928552

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3928552


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Security & JAAS/JBoss] - Re: CLIENT-CERT AUTH: is it really strong?

2006-02-25 Thread fguerzoni
"two-way SSL handshake" with certificate from both sides is handled at lower 
level.
Ain't to be reinvented! 
bye

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3926271#3926271

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3926271


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Security & JAAS/JBoss] - CLIENT-CERT AUTH: is it really strong?

2006-02-22 Thread fguerzoni
My question rises from the fact that client is authenticated against a 
principal retrieved from the public certificate that the browser send in 
response to ObjectCallabck.
Is it possible that a user could send this certificate even when he's not the 
real certifcate owner?
I remember that security is based on digital sign of random hash sent by server 
and verified on server against the public certificate stored a in java store.
But I cannot find this feature in the sources that manage client authentication 
in Jboss 4.0.3SP1 release.

Any suggestion will be appreciated.
thanks in advance
F

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3925652#3925652

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3925652


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: EJB-3.0_RC5-PFD tutorial: problem on stateless sample

2006-02-16 Thread fguerzoni
What a mistake!
Thanks Peter.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3924404#3924404

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3924404


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [EJB 3.0] - EJB-3.0_RC5-PFD tutorial: problem on stateless sample

2006-02-16 Thread fguerzoni
I've succesfully installed JBoss-4.0.4RC1 on windows XP sp2 using graphical 
installer.
Now I was experimenting with stateless session bean as explained in the 
tutorial.

I'm not able to do the lookup to local interface CalculatorLocal of 
CalculatorBean on client side.
What I get is:

run:
 [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
 [java] at 
org.jboss.ejb3.stateless.StatelessLocalProxy.invoke(StatelessLocalProxy.java:74)
 [java] at $Proxy0.add(Unknown Source)
 [java] at org.jboss.tutorial.stateless.client.Client.main(Client.java:35)
 [java] Java Result: 1
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 1 second


I'm sure about the existence of jndi binding, as reported in Global JNDI 
Namespace (jmx console, service=JNDIView):

  +- CalculatorBean (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
  |   +- local (proxy: $Proxy48 implements interface 
org.jboss.tutorial.stateless.bean.CalculatorLocal,interface 
org.jboss.ejb3.JBossProxy)
  |   +- remote (proxy: $Proxy47 implements interface 
org.jboss.tutorial.stateless.bean.CalculatorRemote,interface 
org.jboss.ejb3.JBossProxy,interface javax.ejb.EJBObject)


Remote binding works correctly. So I'm struggling only on local interface.

Server side sources are same of tutorial.
Client side source has only one line modified (in order to lookup local 
interface)

public class Client
{
   public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
   {
  InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
  Calculator calculator = (Calculator) ctx.lookup("CalculatorBean/local");

  System.out.println("1 + 1 = " + calculator.add(1, 1));
  System.out.println("1 - 1 = " + calculator.subtract(1, 1));
   }
}



Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3924383#3924383

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3924383


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Unable to access Management portlet for Portal 2.2.0RC1

2005-12-09 Thread fguerzoni
I do have same problems

1. Jboss Portal 2.2 RC1 running on MySql 5.0
2. Jboss Jboss AS 4.03 SP1 running on PortalDS

No custom config.

thanks

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3911717#3911717

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3911717


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Persistence,JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - hibernate-service.xml disable second level cache

2005-11-04 Thread fguerzoni
I think it's not yet possible to enable/disable the secons level cache.
In fact, reading the source org.jboss.hibernate.jmx.hibernate.java, I found

  // TODO : needed until we decide what to do about "no cache provider 
specified" internally within Hibernate
  if ( cacheProviderClass == null )
  {
 // Hibernate defaults to always instantiating an EHCacheProvider, which
 // introduces a huge potential for an unecessary dependency
 cacheProviderClass = "org.hibernate.cache.HashtableCacheProvider";
  }

I would appreciate very much if this detail were left to a develper decision.
Is this feature scheduled?
Is there any workaround? For now I'll try to disable the second level cache at 
the class level.

Thanks in advance
Best regards.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3905509#3905509

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3905509


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: JBoss 4.0.2 MDB bind to remote MQSeries

2005-10-17 Thread fguerzoni
It worked for me.
Thanks to all.
I appreciated the great wiki very much.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3901457#3901457

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3901457


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Beginners Corner] - Re: The infamous RmiModeler: ClassNotFoundException

2005-10-05 Thread fguerzoni
Hey, I'm here...
I'm just telling you what worked for me.

>From within the project root dir I execute the following command:

wscompile -verbose -classpath ./bin -gen:server -f:rpcliteral -mapping 
mapping.xml config.xml

where config.xml is in the project root dir;
where bin is the dir where Eclipse put the compiled classes and related 
packages (bin is a child of project root dir).

I think you are wrong in the dir name format.

Hope this works.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3899325#3899325

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3899325


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: JBoss 4.0.2 MDB bind to remote MQSeries

2005-10-03 Thread fguerzoni
I have identical problem too.

My configuration is as follows:
JBoss 4.0.2
JDK 1.5.0_05
MQSeries version 5.3 


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3898724#3898724

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3898724


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user