[JBoss-user] [Installation & Configuration] - log4j logging for the cleant jar
Hi, Is there an example of turning on TRACE level logging for the JBoss client jar ? Thanks for all and any help !! sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3868289#3868289 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3868289 --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - JBoss 3.2.4RC2 - DRM
Hi, I have just started using jboss 3.2.4RC2. I have set-up a 2 node cluster which is 'out-of-the-box' using UDP. The two nodes are on separate host machines. I am making use of the 'farm service' to deploy a simple service to the cluster. The service is implemented as an mbean and is specified as follows in the file: | | http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss-service_3_2.dtd"; | > | | | | | | | | | | jboss:service=DefaultPartition | | | | | jboss:service=invoker,type=jrmpha | | | | | org.jboss.ha.framework.interfaces.RoundRobin | | | | | com.panacya.prototype:service=CounterService | | | | | panacya/CounterService | | | | | com.panacya.prototype.ha.service.CounterServiceOperations | | | | | | | org.jboss.proxy.ClientMethodInterceptor | | | org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor | | | | | | | | | | jboss:service=ScheduleManager | | | | com.panacya.prototype.ha.service.CounterServiceOperations | | | | DefaultPartition | | | | | When the sar file is deployed to node 'A' into the /farm directory the sar is detected and loaded locally and as documented it is farmed out to the other node in the cluster - node 'B'. The deployment completes I inspect the DRM mbeans on nodes 'A' and 'B' via the jmx-console using #listContents. On node 'A' only the locally available instance of (my) service is listed. On node 'B' the local instance and the remote (i.e. node 'A') are listed. I would have expected the lists to have looked the same. Additionally the other entries in the list look good to me in that they are listed as present on both nodes i.e. the HASingletonDeployer, HAJNDI and the 'DCacheBridge'. Is this the expected behavior ? Hope someone can put me on the right track. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3835717#3835717 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3835717 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: test server performances
Hi, Here is a reference to one paper: [url] http://jmob.objectweb.org/JGroups.html [/url] This deals with JGroups upon which the partitions are built. Hope this is of relevance, sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3835181#3835181 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3835181 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: JBoss 3.2.2 - Round-Robin load balancing.
Hi, This thread has been running on the JMX Forum: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=49615 This is the more appropriate forum. I traced my problem down to the smart-proxy having its list of targets updated on the return from the invocation. I got down to the JRMPInvokerHA.invoke() method where the HARMIResponse is constructed. There is a comparison between the from the Invocation instance and the and these are not equal so the change is triggered. Now I looked into the JGroups/HAPartitionImpl interactions at the JGroups interface to try to understand how the HATarget gets its value set. I noticed the these 'low-level' view ids are not the same as the values displayed in the jmx-console 'DefaultPartition' mbean 'view id'. The high-level values are consistent across the cluster nodes. Some sequentially incremented value. I have traced through the DitributeReplicantManagerImpl.purgeDeadMembers() and calculateReplicantHash() but can see no relation to the high-level clustered view id. Why is the high-level view id not propogated down to this lower-level ? i.e. associate the 'replicants' directly with the cluster-wide view id. Thanks for your help! sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3835001#3835001 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3835001 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 - Clustered MBeans.
Adrian, I got down to the JRMPInvokerHA.invoke() method where the HARMIResponse is constructed. There is a comparison between the from the Invocation instance and the and these are not equal so the change is triggered. Now I looked into the JGroups/HAPartitionImpl interactions at the JGroups interface to try to understand how the HATarget gets its value set. I noticed the these 'low-level' view ids are not the same as the values displayed in the jmx-console 'DefaultPartition' mbean 'view id'. The high-level values are consistent across the cluster nodes. Some sequentially incremented value. I have traced through the DitributeReplicantManagerImpl.purgeDeadMembers() and calculateReplicantHash() but can see no relation to the high-level clustered view id. Why is the high-level view id not propogated down to this lower-level ? i.e. associate the 'replicants' directly with the cluster-wide view id. Thanks for your help! sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834993#3834993 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834993 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Initialization tasks in a cluster?
Hi Mattin, There is a clustered provided. It is discussed in the clustering documentation. The package is another place to start looking. There are examples also. Hope this is of some help. sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834959#3834959 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834959 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3 - Clustered MBeans.
Adrian, Cheers for the reply! I have been debugging the problem and so far it looks as if the FamilyClusterInfo list initially has two targets - JRMPInvokerProxy_Stubs to the respective endpoints - however after an invocation to the less-favoured node the list is reduced to a single target ie. the favoured node. Under what circumstances does the list get updated and more specifically how is the determination to remove a target made ? P.S. I had a limited success and did see the load-balancing behave as expected however this is no longer the case ... today.;-) Thanks for any pointers !! sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834713#3834713 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834713 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - JBoss 3.2.3 - Clustered MBeans.
Hi there, I am trying to implement a load balancing prototype using the 'round- robin' policy . I have a two node cluster set-up and communicating. I use the farm service to deploy the prototype archive to the cluster. My service is an mbean extending HAServiceMBeanSupport. It uses a ProxyFactoryHA instance and a JRMPInvokerHA invoker. The dd is based upon: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/resources/jmx/ha/META-INF/jboss-service.xml?rev=1.2&view=auto In a client for-loop the service is invoked e.g. 1000 times The bulk are consistently invoked on the one node - which happens to be the node running the client for-loop code. However I only ever see 1 or 2 of those invocations being invoked on 'the other' node. My expectation was a more even distribution of these invocations between the two nodes. However this is not the case. Can anyone help or suggest where I may be going wrong ? Thanks for all and any help. sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834455#3834455 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834455 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - JBoss 3.2.2 - Round-Robin load balancing.
Hi there, I am trying to implement a load balancing prototype using the 'round- robin' policy . I have a two node cluster set-up and communicating. I use the farm service to deploy the prototype to the cluster nodes. My service is an mbean using HA service support plus the dd is based upon: [url] http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/resources/jmx/ha/META-INF/jboss-service.xml?rev=1.2&view=auto [/url] In a client for-loop I invoke my service interface e.g. 1000 times however I only see 1 or 2 of those invocations being invoked on 'the other' node. The bulk are consistently invoked on the one node - which happens to be the node running the client for-loop code. My expectation was a more even distribution of these invocations between the two nodes. However this is not the case. Can anyone help or point to a config setting which I missed ? n.b. I am using jboss 3.2.3. Thank you for all and any help. sinclair View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3834153#3834153 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3834153 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Relation Service
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820772#3820772
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820772
Further,
In the RelationSupport class #handleMBeanUnregistration() method
it looks as though the Role.roleValues are not being modified to reflect the removal.
handleMBeanUnregistration(ObjectName objectName, String roleName) throws ... {
checkRegistered();
Role role = validateRoleFound(roleName);
// sb: role.getRoleValue() implementation returns a copy
ArrayList values = (ArrayList) role.getRoleValue();
ArrayList oldRoleValue = new ArrayList(values);
// sb: this updates the copy
if (values.remove(objectName) == false)
throw new InvalidRoleValueException("...");
// sb: thus the role state is intact ?
updateRole(role, oldRoleValue);
}
By adding an call to #setRoleValues() as below
Role role = validateRoleFound(roleName);
ArrayList values = (ArrayList) role.getRoleValue();
ArrayList oldRoleValue = new ArrayList(values);
if (values.remove(objectName) == false)
throw new InvalidRoleValueException("...");
// sb: added
role.setRoleValue(values);
// end added
updateRole(role, oldRoleValue);
it is possible to capture the change for downstream processing.
I am not sure whether this is the correct/best place to apply the update to the Role
instance within the processing context however it would appear to be the most
opportune in the call sequence.
Hope this helps,
sinclair
panacya inc.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - RelationService: implementation of purgeRelations()
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820763#3820763
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820763
Hi,
I have been familiarizing myself with the JBoss 3.2.3 JMX implementation.
I came across the following code in the RelationService.purgeRelations() method
(around line #820) where there is a call to which requests that the
#handleMBeanUnregistration method be called
i.e.
...
// It's ok tell the relation about the unregistration
server.invoke(objectName,
"handleMBeanUnregistration",
new Object[] { mbean, roleName },
new String[] { "java.lang.String", "java.lang.String "} );
...
The "signature" arguments describe two "java.lang.String" parameters however the
parameter is a "javax.management.ObjectName".
When running through this code using the test case the instances names a
RelationSupportMBean which extends the Relation interface.
Thus I am making the assumption that the intention is to invoke
#handleMBeanUnregistration(...) on a RelationSupportMBean instance (at runtime an
Exception is thrown, caught and re-thrown as a RuntimeException).
In the Relation interface the #handleMBeanUnregistration(...) method signature is:
#handleMBeanUnregistration(ObjectName objectName,
String roleName);
I have been unable to locate an implementation of #handleMBeanUnregistration(...)
which accept two String instances.
Can anyone help clarify the intention of this code segement and its correctness ?
Cheers,
sinclair
panacya inc.,
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Relation Service
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820739#3820739 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820739 JMX - Relation Service. I have been using the test cases for the JMX - Relation Service implementation in JBoss 3.2.3 to create Relations among MBeans. When working with internal relations I found that if a role value MBean was unregistered in the MBeanServer the associated Role.roleValues did not reflect the de-registration of the MBean, i.e. the MBean ObjectName was still a member of the List returned by RelationService.getRole(String theRelId, String theRoleName) method. Based upon my understanding I expected that the list would not have contained this reference since the RelationService is responsible for maintaining the internal consistency. Is this understanding correct ? sinclair --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
