[JBoss-user] [Installation, Configuration Deployment] - Re: NPE deploying Hibernate service
Bit old this post, but I thought I'd post the reply as I've spent all day fighting this. The problem stems from you using an ear file. if you seperate your hibernate files and put them in a .har file it works fine. Not sure what the solution is to including har in an ear and I've run out of time to be fannying around with this, just deploying them seperately. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3912666#3912666 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3912666 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: MBean always uses local bean despite a lookup on a remot
private SearcherService getSearcherService(String serverName) throws
NamingException {
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory);
props.put(Context.URL_PKG_PREFIXES,
jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces);
props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, serverName + :1099);
InitialContext ic = new InitialContext(props);
return (SearcherService) ic.lookup(SearcherService.JNDINAME);
}
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3854972#3854972
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3854972
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: MBean always uses local bean despite a lookup on a remot
I've sussed it now. You need to call the MBeanServer I was treating it like an EJB. Thanks for the pointer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3854978#3854978 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3854978 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - MBean always uses local bean despite a lookup on a remote ma
I have two identical MBeans on two servers. Each server has access to a different file system, so I need to be able to use each mbean on each machine. It seems to always use the local MBean, despite explicitly looking it up on the other machines JNDI space. Is this the same as EJB's defaulting to the local interfaces, despite looking it up remotely? Is it an optimisation method. Is there anyway to stop this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3854875#3854875 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3854875 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Schizo Server
We're using 3.2.3. Sometime when we shutdown one of our clustered servers and then bring it back up. It suffers from what we refer to as paranoid server syndrome. It suspects another version of itself of being in the cluster. The other members in the cluster also begin this loop too, they never seem to tire of trying to find the alternate personality of the restarted server. All report 2004-07-08 21:38:02,620 INFO [org.jboss.ha.framework.interfaces.HAPartition.TestPartition] Suspected member: 2**.8*.1**.85:37983 (additional data: 18 bytes) So a cluster of 3, thinks it's a cluster of 4. Any ideas, any budding psychiatrists? David Townsend View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3841425#3841425 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3841425 --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
