[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2005-08-17 Thread myparu
I just found this - on configuring queue receivers in round-robin:

http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3890426#3890426

hope that helped.

murali

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3890428#3890428

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3890428


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2005-08-15 Thread myparu
I configured MDBs to run off a queue in a cluster of JBoss instances (4.0.1sp1) 
 for load balancing and notice a similar behaviour. The non-master nodes dont 
receive as many messages as the master node does. Starvation does not really 
bother my application, but it will be nice to share the load.

I could not find any option to configure round-robin kinda thing. 

Any light on this please, anyone?

Thanks
Murali


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3890023#3890023

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3890023


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2005-08-04 Thread Rohan Talip
chrisdutz wrote : Well I can't realy provide a solution, but I can confirm 
that this problem seems to still exist in JBoss 4.0.0.
  | 
  | Is there a JBoss Enterprise-Edition for more than 2-Node clusters 
available? ;)
  | 
I am not using a MDBs but I am using multiple distributed QueueReceivers, 3 for 
one queue, distributed across different JBoss servers/nodes running JBoss 
4.0.1sp1.

I am seeing a similar problem.

The Warnings from DefaultPartition within  2 node cluster topic 
(http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=56835) mentions that 
the 'javax.naming.NameNotFoundException:ConnectionFactory not bound' seen in 
the logs is just a warning (and will eventually be changed into a debug).

I do see this warning in our JBoss logs, and for a while (i.e. many hours) 
nothing is read off the queue from the 3rd node, even though it is being read 
on the 1st and 2nd node (i.e. master and one non-master).  Eventually the 3rd 
node will read messages off the queue, but that might just be because the other 
2 nodes are busy processing messages.

I'm wondering if JBossMQ distributes the load evenly across multiple 
QueueReceivers or if it is just the first QueueReceiver to poll the master node 
(i.e. broker in ActiveMQ speak) that gets the message off the queue, hence 
leading to possible 'starvation'?

From what I have observed empirically, on our system the QueueReceiver on the 
master node gets more messages than the 2nd node, while the 3rd node doesn't 
get many messages.

Is this configurable? i.e. is there an attribute that can be set for some sort 
of round-robin delivery/receipt?

Thanks for any help.

Regards,

Rohan


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3888491#3888491

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3888491


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-12-21 Thread chrisdutz
Well I can't realy provide a solution, but I can confirm that this problem 
seems to still exist in JBoss 4.0.0.

Is there a JBoss Enterprise-Edition for more than 2-Node clusters available? ;)

One thing I might add ... don't know if it helps: I had to modify the 
hajndi-jms-ds.xml File and change localhost:1100 to local-machine-name:1100 
otherwise I always got connection refused errors ... it seemed a little 
strange, but I didn't bother since it worked from here on (at least with 1 and 
two cluster nodes)

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3859426#3859426

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3859426


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-12-21 Thread ckmod
Hi,

when you look up a queue in a clustered HA-JMS-JBoss-setup you need to specify 
the hajndi-port in the PROVIDER_URL:
Properties props = new Properties();
props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, jnp://localhost:1100); HA-JNDI-Port !!!
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(props);
...

I hope I remember this correctly because I cant look at the code right now.

Regards,
Claus

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3859510#3859510

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3859510


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest  candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-11-08 Thread sudkampf
I have not found a solution yet.  Have you?

At this point we will probably use two server instances on two seperate boxes 
and any other instances we want will be consumers of the message queues managed 
by the original two instances.  

If you hear of a solution...let me know.  I'd like to get it corrected if 
possible.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3854285#3854285

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3854285


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-11-07 Thread RolfZ
Did you find a solution/workaround for this problem yet ?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3854228#3854228

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3854228


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-10-29 Thread sudkampf
I am getting the exact same results using JBoss-3.2.5.  I can get two instances woking 
on a single server or seperate servers in a clustered environment but a third instance 
on any server causes this warning to occur and the MDBs I deployed on the final 
instance to be unavailable. 



View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853321#3853321

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853321


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588alloc_id=12065op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-10-04 Thread RolfZ
Well the problem is that I can't lookup the  XAConnectionFactory or ConnectionFactory 
on this node anymore and therefore it is not possible for me to send a message to a 
queue.
There must be a better way of doing it ? Any help is very much appreciated

Cheers
  Rolf





View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3850350#3850350

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3850350


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-10-01 Thread RolfZ
Any suggestion ?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3850149#3850149

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3850149


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Cluster MDB's

2004-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This warning is irrelevant and is expected non-homogeneous cluster deployment. Its 
coming from the HAJNDI server code, not client code doing the actual lookup. Its a 
message saying someone has asked for a JNDI binding that the node emitting the warning 
does not have. This would be one of the non-JMS server nodes. It really should be a 
debug level message, not a warning.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3850156#3850156

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3850156


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user