[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Read-mostly best practice on jboss4.0.1sp1
Nothing against TreeCache, it looks great from what I've read, I simply didn't want the application codebase dependant on specific vendors API. I could abstract caching as a service, although wasn't that the point of JSR-107. Does anyone know where that stands nowadays I haven't been following is there a published API? I'm not sure I agree with you on being vendor specific once you run clustering. I know it's not in J2EE spec and obviously you have to account for replication/latency concerns but I should be able to design for a clustered Session or Entity bean and leave binding/policies as something that is dealt with in configuration right? BTW I don't want this to degrade into a religious thread I was simply looking for input on current best practice for 4.0.1sp1. By sounds of things JBoss line is to use TreeCache in BMP right Ben? Andrew View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876563#3876563 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876563 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Read-mostly best practice on jboss4.0.1sp1
I don't get your rationale of not to depend on TreeCache version. The minute you run clustering, you get vendor specific tie in already. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876243#3876243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876243 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Read-mostly best practice on jboss4.0.1sp1
This would probably give the cleanest solution unfortunately the data to the mainframe is marshalled through a third party request/response style API which is why I was thinking BMP would be the way to go. If ther's an abstraction in the container where I could do mapping of entity fields CMP would give me the caching/transaction for free. The data is a simple bean with well defined key and nothing nested and no relationships. Does anyone know if I could write a custom connector or bridge to map to a custom persistence API? Are there any docs/samples covering this? Andrew View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875637#3875637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875637 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: Read-mostly best practice on jboss4.0.1sp1
If CMP is an option for you you could use the container configuration "Standard CMP 2.x EntityBean with cache invalidation" defined in standardjboss.xml. This configuration has an interceptor that removes a bean instance from the cache cluster-wide, once it is written. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875545#3875545 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875545 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
