I hope someone is reading it... or am I writing to myself?
Anyway, I think this is the problem code (from TreeCacheAop.java):
public void evict(Fqn fqn) throws CacheException {
// We will remove all children nodes as well since we assume all children
nodes are part
// of this "object" node.
if(isAopNode(fqn)) {
if(log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug("evict(): evicting whole aop node " +fqn);
}
// _remove(null, fqn, create_undo_ops, false);
// TODO Why do we not want to remove the interceptor??? I think we
should.
// Because if we remove it, the caller has no idea that it has been
taken off.
// She will still think that caching is in effect. But this returns
null value from cache.
// What's is a good policy?
boolean removeCacheInterceptor = false;
_removeObject(fqn, removeCacheInterceptor); } else {
super.evict(fqn);
}
}
Is it possible to remove the interceptor only for this one call (_removeObject)
and then put it back? Seems like that would be the right thing to do.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3875060#3875060
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3875060
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
