[JBoss-user] [Javassist user questions] - Re: Limitations
Yes, that's a perfect solution. (sorry, it's annonying...) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3863380#3863380 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3863380 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Javassist user questions] - Re: Limitations
Although $proceed does not imply this problem, newname($$); would do. I agree this is a bug, which should be fixed soon. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3862737#3862737 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3862737 --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Javassist user questions] - Re: Limitations
So to avoid this problem, i could work around by producing sth like | ... | newname((Type1)$1, (Type2)$2, ...) | ... | Or wouldnt this help anyway?!? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3862808#3862808 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3862808 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Javassist user questions] - Re: Limitations
1) Ok ... in this case i can surely wait, as i m just going to copy methods and not trying to create new ones. 2) Thx for the example. How is the behaviour if i m performing wrapping like in Java programming dynamics, Part 4: Class transformation with Javassist by Dennis M. Sosnoski, IBM developerWorks, September 16, 2003. So just by copy methods, rename one and add a call like: | | newname($$); | | Do i also have this drawbacks if i m handling it this way? Sincerely Sirrurg P.S.: I hope this question dont become to annoying to you[/url] View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3862535#3862535 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3862535 --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Javassist user questions] - Re: Limitations
Hi, 1) The limitation is not applied to copied bytecode. The tutorial says that the compiler does not understand synchronized. However, the upcoming release 3.0 supports a synchronized statement. So please download CVS HEAD or wait for several days. We are going to release 3.0 soon. 2) For example, class A {} class B extends A {} class C extends C {} class X { void foo(A a) { .. } void foo(B b) { .. } } If the compiled expression is x.foo(new C()), where x is an instance of X, the compiler may produce a call to foo(A) although the compiler can correctly compile foo((B)new C()). This description will be also included in the tutorial coming with the next release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3862517#3862517 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3862517 --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user