JBoss uses org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt itself. For the average JMX user, javax.management.MBeanServerInvocationHandler seems like the correct interface to use and sufficiently good.
Is there some reason to use one over the other, besides the additional features of MBeanProxyExt? Is one legacy? These docs seem to use it: http://docs.jboss.com/jbcache/1.2.4/TreeCache/html/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3919739#3919739 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3919739 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
