[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regarding jsr77 names, although it is now clearer how to identify the jsr77 
root domains, I think we could consider leaving inside the 
'jboss.management.local' domain only the jsr77 generated mbeans, and take 
outside the 2 manager services. So

  | jboss.management.local:j2eeType=J2EEDomain,name=Manager 
  | jboss.management.local:name=DefaultManager,type=JSR88DeploymentManager 
  | 
Could be:

  | jboss.management:service=JSR77DomainManager
  | jboss.management:service=JSR88DeploymentManager
  | 
I don't think there are other services referencing the 2 manager mbeans?

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3919689#3919689

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3919689


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-11 Thread ghinkle
Absolutely agree with that. I'm just saying that the fix for the jndi problem 
has caused other problems in the jmx area. Object names need to be unique 
obviously and I was proposing a way to make them unique, but stable. As far as 
I'm concerned the jndi fix caused a regression in proper jmx support.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916910#3916910

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916910


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-11 Thread ghinkle
Looking into the jsr-77 spec further... it states The value of the name key 
property for managed object instances of the J2EEDomain type must be equivalent 
to the domain name of the domain it
manages.(JSR-77 FR, 22-23)

JBoss uses the domain jboss.management.local even when the J2EEDomain object 
declares the domain to be Manager.

e.g. 
J2EEApplication=null,J2EEServer=Local,ServiceModule=jboss-service.xml,j2eeType=MBean,name=jboss.management.local:j2eeType=J2EEDomain,name=Manager


I'd still like to see the service EJB fixed as well though.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916916#3916916

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916916


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So lets fix the object names. The JSR77 names are independent of the ejb 
container names and can be fixed without any changes to the ejb container use 
of jmx names.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916974#3916974

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916974


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We also need testscases asserting the consitency and structure of the names 
used. All projects need to be cooperating in terms of asserting which apis are 
being used by providing or at least creating jira issues for their usage 
requirements.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916975#3916975

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916975


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2651

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916984#3916984

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916984


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


[JBoss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Consistency in JMX naming

2006-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue really isn't why the local-jndi-name is variable, its why the 
local-jndi-name is being used in the jmx name. The jmx name should be 
independent of this using the deployment structure and ejb-name as this has to 
be unique.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3916807#3916807

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3916807


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user