[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: UIL2 processes and SocketManager
Thanks for the answers Adrian ! Regards, Arnaud View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3829911#3829911 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3829911 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: UIL2 processes and SocketManager
Just a note (it'll be the last) to tell you that some nagiosed task did call the 8093 port of the server (which is in fact our UIL2's port). That clearly explains the stacks. Thanks again for the good pointer ! Regards, Arnaud View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3829919#3829919 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3829919 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: UIL2 processes and SocketManager
Please forget last question , since we will wait for the 3.2.4 release. Having been through JBoss's Thread dump, it appears that this morning, before start of production, there is about 300 WriteTask threads left for only 5 or 6 ReadTask. | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1314 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1316 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1318 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1320 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1322 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1324 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1326 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1328 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1330 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1332 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1334 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1336 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1338 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1340 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1342 : priority:5, demon:true | Thread: UIL2.SocketManager.WriteTask#1344 : priority:5, demon:true | Is this the direct consequence of the failed ReadTask(s) ? Also I've been wondering why the ReadTask stacks appear exactly each 5 minutes, and even at restart of JBoss ( with or without clients connected) Best regards, Arnaud View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3829749#3829749 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3829749 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: UIL2 processes and SocketManager
No idea about the 5 minute thing, it sounds like you have some client connecting the UIL2 port, but it is not a messaging client. This is how we discovered this bug in the first place. Regards, Adrian View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3829831#3829831 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3829831 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Messaging, JMS JBossMQ] - Re: UIL2 processes and SocketManager
This is a bug which has already been fixed: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/uil2/SocketManager.java?r1=1.1.4.8r2=1.1.4.9 UIL2 does use more threads than OIL making it more concurrent/scalable when there are multiple sessions on the same connection. It is on my list of enhancements to make use a shared thread pool for these threads. Regards, Adrian View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3829597#3829597 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3829597 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
