[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
bkeh12 wrote : Hi, | | Yup odic :-) Hi, I wish to see jboss microcontainer work this way as soon as possible :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3934298#3934298 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3934298 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
Hi, Yup odic :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3934224#3934224 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3934224 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
bkeh12 wrote : anonymous wrote : I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...) | anonymous wrote : It seems that with a set of reasonable defaults, there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files. | | I an sympathy with your views. | | see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html | and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html Hi, is this meaning something like single class file with deployment scrits inside the same class file would be enough for deployment? cool.. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3934144#3934144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3934144 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
Since the ever timeframe leaves anything as a possibility, I can guarentee at some time this will be supportable. Whether a single class file is a meaningful deployment unit is a question that will set the priority of such a deployment. I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3929866#3929866 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3929866 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
If the deployment does become available, I suspect that it will be very popular. It might establish a new development work-flow pattern. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3929881#3929881 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3929881 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
[JBoss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: Future Architecture?
anonymous wrote : I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...) anonymous wrote : It seems that with a set of reasonable defaults, there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files. I an sympathy with your views. see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3929956#3929956 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3929956 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
