Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss

2002-05-13 Thread Simon Stewart

As I see it, most of the work needs to be at deploy time, converting
and processing the WL specific XML config files. If that's the case,
then a few extra seconds (minute?) to start up isn't a great price to
pay for the convenience. Any additional adaptor classes could sit
inside a deploy time SAR/JAR, and so wouldn't need to clutter up the
main tree at all.

Of course, INAHacker, so this might not be true ;)

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 05:01:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Might it not make more sense to make a tool to extract the contents
> of the jars, modify them to run on jboss, and produce a new jboss
> compatible jar? That way the jboss code base wont get bogged down
> with a load of stuff a lot of users will never go near. (don't take
> it as a criticism, the idea is brilliant, I just thought this
> approach could work well)

Cheers,

Simon

-- 
"So you could say the greatest achievement of the Internet is that it
turns nuclear war into nothing more than a series of routing errors."
   -- Mark Pesce

___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss

2002-05-13 Thread Andreas Schaefer

Hi Sean

> Might it not make more sense to make a tool to extract the contents of the
> jars,
> modify them to run on jboss, and produce a new jboss compatible jar? That
> way the
> jboss code base wont get bogged down with a load of stuff a lot of users
> will never
> go near. (don't take it as a criticism, the idea is brilliant, I just
> thought this
> approach could work well)

Maybe we can provide both but I really want to have this on the fly
because that is what makes it cool (like the Hot Deployment etc.).

I don't see that this will need much code (right now) as long as we
focus on WL.

Andy



___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss

2002-05-13 Thread sean . odonnell

Might it not make more sense to make a tool to extract the contents of the
jars,
modify them to run on jboss, and produce a new jboss compatible jar? That
way the 
jboss code base wont get bogged down with a load of stuff a lot of users
will never 
go near. (don't take it as a criticism, the idea is brilliant, I just
thought this 
approach could work well)

-Original Message-
From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 May 2002 08:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss


Hi

> Would be cool, but how would you handle CMP-related issues?  For example,
> my project uses WebGain TopLink (*shiver*) and last I checked it didn't
support
> JBoss...

Good question and currently I don't know. For now
I just want to make the easiest way happening:
- WL JAR files with WL own CMP implementation

Later on I guess we will go one step at the time by either emulating WebGain
TopLink
or using it.
I don't want to create a 100% emulation (at least not for now) but a good
80/20
emulation.

Andy



___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss

2002-05-13 Thread Andreas Schaefer

Hi

> Would be cool, but how would you handle CMP-related issues?  For example,
> my project uses WebGain TopLink (*shiver*) and last I checked it didn't
support
> JBoss...

Good question and currently I don't know. For now
I just want to make the easiest way happening:
- WL JAR files with WL own CMP implementation

Later on I guess we will go one step at the time by either emulating WebGain
TopLink
or using it.
I don't want to create a 100% emulation (at least not for now) but a good
80/20
emulation.

Andy



___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



[JBoss-user] Your chance to work on JBoss

2002-05-13 Thread Andreas Schaefer

Hi Geeks

I am trying to create a BEA Weblogic emulator therefore
that a BEA Weblogic client can drop its JAR/WAR/EAR
(before running it through "ejbc") in JBoss and it would
deploy like a JBoss archive.
Imagine a developer can go to his/her boss and show
him/her that their developed application runs under JBoss
like under BEA WL w/o any adjustments. This would
make it even more easy to switch to JBoss.

Whatever works for M$ and Linux (Wine) can work
for us, too.

So I need some volunteers to start with (you, you and
you ;-). Note, this is your chance to get involved and
to kick some butts especially the ones from BEA .

Have fun

x
Andreas Schaefer
Senior Consultant
JBoss Group, LLC
x



___

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user