Re: [JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip

2002-03-06 Thread Holger Baxmann

ok, thank you very much, now i understand; i'll stay tuned for the
xmbeans.

cheers
bax

Am Mit, 2002-03-06 um 15.00 schrieb David Jencks:
> On 2002.03.06 07:51:28 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > Am Die, 2002-03-05 um 21.24 schrieb David Jencks:
> > > On 2002.03.05 14:33:24 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > > > is it possible, that the build sources-zip doesn't grab the
> > > > MainDeployerMBean.java from the gen-src in system/output ?
> > > 
> > > I would hope that a source distribution would not include generated
> > source
> > > code, so I hope it doesn't. Does it include the needed xdoclet tool?
> > yes, ... but wouldn't it be nice to have a 'plain' source-zip for
> > investigating the inner workings with an ide, my prefered is eclipse,
> > only as an source attachment for the runtime-jars, not for a build
> > process ?
> 
> Well, if you use a code generator you are no longer writing in java but in
> an extended language.  I think it is clearer to include and look at only
> the source, not any intermediate generated code.  This might make using
> automated java tools a little harder, but I don't think providing an
> opportunity to confuse real and generated code is a good idea.
> 
> For the particular case of xxxMBean interfaces they will probably be
> leaving us soon anyway due to switching to xmbeans.
> 
> david jencks
> 
> david jencks
> > 
> > corrrect me if i miss something here
> > 
> > bax
> > ps: 'plain' means having only the package structure in this zip, no
> > toplevel, only org/com/java/javax at the first level.
> > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > the org.jboss.admin.interfaces are missing in action too.
> > > > 
> > > > and more impotent: org.jboss.jmx.adaptor.interfaces
> > > 
> > > Are these generated as well?
> > > 
> > > david jencks
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > it seems so at least for me
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ___
> > > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > 
> > 
> 
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip

2002-03-06 Thread David Jencks

On 2002.03.06 07:51:28 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> Am Die, 2002-03-05 um 21.24 schrieb David Jencks:
> > On 2002.03.05 14:33:24 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> > > is it possible, that the build sources-zip doesn't grab the
> > > MainDeployerMBean.java from the gen-src in system/output ?
> > 
> > I would hope that a source distribution would not include generated
> source
> > code, so I hope it doesn't. Does it include the needed xdoclet tool?
> yes, ... but wouldn't it be nice to have a 'plain' source-zip for
> investigating the inner workings with an ide, my prefered is eclipse,
> only as an source attachment for the runtime-jars, not for a build
> process ?

Well, if you use a code generator you are no longer writing in java but in
an extended language.  I think it is clearer to include and look at only
the source, not any intermediate generated code.  This might make using
automated java tools a little harder, but I don't think providing an
opportunity to confuse real and generated code is a good idea.

For the particular case of xxxMBean interfaces they will probably be
leaving us soon anyway due to switching to xmbeans.

david jencks

david jencks
> 
> corrrect me if i miss something here
> 
> bax
> ps: 'plain' means having only the package structure in this zip, no
> toplevel, only org/com/java/javax at the first level.
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > the org.jboss.admin.interfaces are missing in action too.
> > > 
> > > and more impotent: org.jboss.jmx.adaptor.interfaces
> > 
> > Are these generated as well?
> > 
> > david jencks
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > it seems so at least for me
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > ___
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 

___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip

2002-03-05 Thread David Jencks

On 2002.03.05 14:33:24 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
> is it possible, that the build sources-zip doesn't grab the
> MainDeployerMBean.java from the gen-src in system/output ?

I would hope that a source distribution would not include generated source
code, so I hope it doesn't. Does it include the needed xdoclet tool?
> 
> the org.jboss.admin.interfaces are missing in action too.
> 
> and more impotent: org.jboss.jmx.adaptor.interfaces

Are these generated as well?

david jencks
> 
> 
> 
> it seems so at least for me
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> 
> 

___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



Re: [JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip

2002-03-05 Thread Adrian Brock

These sources are generated using xdoclet at build time.
Look for the javadoc tag @jmx:mbean

Regards,
Adrian

>From: Holger Baxmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: JBoss 2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip
>Date: 05 Mar 2002 20:33:24 +0100
>
>is it possible, that the build sources-zip doesn't grab the
>MainDeployerMBean.java from the gen-src in system/output ?
>
>the org.jboss.admin.interfaces are missing in action too.
>
>and more impotent: org.jboss.jmx.adaptor.interfaces
>
>
>
>it seems so at least for me
>
>
>
>
>___
>JBoss-user mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user




_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.;


___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



[JBoss-user] missing sources in target source-zip

2002-03-05 Thread Holger Baxmann

is it possible, that the build sources-zip doesn't grab the
MainDeployerMBean.java from the gen-src in system/output ?

the org.jboss.admin.interfaces are missing in action too.

and more impotent: org.jboss.jmx.adaptor.interfaces



it seems so at least for me




___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user