Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Scott M Stark wrote: These are all old headers from the pre-conversion to LGPL. They will be corrected or removed. Well, you can change the license only if you got such permission from all the committers to these files. And even from those aliens who did not commit directly, but sent a patch which was applied by somebody else and have this statement included (better ask your lawyer first, folks). You should check the CVS history and look for patches for these files before going this way, IMHO. Vlad --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Juha Lindfors wrote: Which is why he said corrected OR removed. He said this about header, not about the file. Correcting or removing header which describes a license is illegal without a proper permission from authors. -- Juha On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: Scott M Stark wrote: These are all old headers from the pre-conversion to LGPL. They will be corrected or removed. Well, you can change the license only if you got such permission from all the committers to these files. And even from those aliens who did not commit directly, but sent a patch which was applied by somebody else and have this statement included (better ask your lawyer first, folks). You should check the CVS history and look for patches for these files before going this way, IMHO. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so. GPL licensed files #grep -R under GPL * jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/Jetty.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyMBean.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyService.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/log/JBossLogSink.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/security/JBossUserRealm.java: * Distributable under GPL license. ( Regards, Bill Bill Burke Chief Architect JBoss Group, LLC Cast your vote for JBoss as JDJ Best App Server http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/vote.cfm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Wallis Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vladyslav Kosulin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 05:15, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: P.S. Do you know that there are java source files licensed under GPL (not LGPL) in the latest JBoss 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 distributions and even in the CVS HEAD? Are you surprised? This statement worries me. Vlad, can you name one or more specific files that are GPL rather than LGPL? If these do exist what is the plan to rectify what to me seems to be a serious problem. Something like this could prevent me from using JBoss at all. This is serious if true! brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072 303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Brian Wallis wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so. GPL licensed files #grep -R under GPL * jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/Jetty.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyMBean.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyService.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/log/JBossLogSink.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/security/JBossUserRealm.java: * Distributable under GPL license. There also seems to be a reference to being GPL licensed in JNP. ./naming/src/docs/index.html:JNP is licensed through GPL (see www.gnu.org for details). Should I be worrying at this point. Are these things really GPL licensed and if so what are the consequences to me as a developer using JBoss and also using the Jetty integration. I am developing a commercial product and have very recently been asked by management to detail the licenses of the varous third party packages and tools that we are using. What should I tell them about JBoss? Is it all LGPL? If some is GPL doesn't that tend to make it all GPL? brian wallis... There should be no issues with JNP still being GPL. I specifically had discussions with Rickard (who wrote the JNP code) back in early 2001 or so about this, since I wanted to use JNP in our product, and he agreed at that time to make it LGPL (and went ahead and did it). I can hopefully dig up the emails if there is a need. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
These are all old headers from the pre-conversion to LGPL. They will be corrected or removed. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Brian Wallis wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so. GPL licensed files #grep -R under GPL * jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/Jetty.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyMBean.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyService.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/log/JBossLogSink.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/security/JBossUserRealm.java: * Distributable under GPL license. There also seems to be a reference to being GPL licensed in JNP. ./naming/src/docs/index.html:JNP is licensed through GPL (see www.gnu.org for details). Should I be worrying at this point. Are these things really GPL licensed and if so what are the consequences to me as a developer using JBoss and also using the Jetty integration. I am developing a commercial product and have very recently been asked by management to detail the licenses of the varous third party packages and tools that we are using. What should I tell them about JBoss? Is it all LGPL? If some is GPL doesn't that tend to make it all GPL? brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so. GPL licensed files #grep -R under GPL * jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/Jetty.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyMBean.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JettyService.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/log/JBossLogSink.java: * Distributable under GPL license. jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/security/JBossUserRealm.java: * Distributable under GPL license. There also seems to be a reference to being GPL licensed in JNP. ./naming/src/docs/index.html:JNP is licensed through GPL (see www.gnu.org for details). Should I be worrying at this point. Are these things really GPL licensed and if so what are the consequences to me as a developer using JBoss and also using the Jetty integration. I am developing a commercial product and have very recently been asked by management to detail the licenses of the varous third party packages and tools that we are using. What should I tell them about JBoss? Is it all LGPL? If some is GPL doesn't that tend to make it all GPL? brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Which is why he said corrected OR removed. -- Juha On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: Scott M Stark wrote: These are all old headers from the pre-conversion to LGPL. They will be corrected or removed. Well, you can change the license only if you got such permission from all the committers to these files. And even from those aliens who did not commit directly, but sent a patch which was applied by somebody else and have this statement included (better ask your lawyer first, folks). You should check the CVS history and look for patches for these files before going this way, IMHO. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
Yes, I'd like to know as well. We will address this issues if it is so. Regards, Bill Bill Burke Chief Architect JBoss Group, LLC Cast your vote for JBoss as JDJ Best App Server http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/vote.cfm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Wallis Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vladyslav Kosulin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 05:15, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: P.S. Do you know that there are java source files licensed under GPL (not LGPL) in the latest JBoss 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 distributions and even in the CVS HEAD? Are you surprised? This statement worries me. Vlad, can you name one or more specific files that are GPL rather than LGPL? If these do exist what is the plan to rectify what to me seems to be a serious problem. Something like this could prevent me from using JBoss at all. This is serious if true! brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072 303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
