Randahl, do not, please, post it to the development list.
The testsuit deals with byte[] instead of java.lang.Object, though. But, nevertheless, try different mappings first. Try also BLOB instead of JAVA_OBJECT. alex Friday, January 10, 2003, 1:18:46 PM, you wrote: RFI> That sure is a constructive suggestion. I currently use the default RFI> mapping which stores serialized java.lang.Object instances as LONG RFI> BINARY - is there a relevant alternative? RFI> Again, the mapping worked fine under 3.0.2 - what changed in 3.0.4? RFI> Would somebody please care to comment on that? RFI> Randahl RFI> -----Original Message----- RFI> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFI> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex RFI> Loubyansky RFI> Sent: 10. januar 2003 11:02 RFI> To: Randahl Fink Isaksen RFI> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] CMP on 3.0.4 with BLOB fields - has anyone RFI> seen it working? RFI> Hello Randahl, RFI> there are BLOB tests in the testsuit that pass successfully. RFI> So, I think your problem is a mapping. Have you tried different RFI> mapping? RFI> alex RFI> Friday, January 10, 2003, 11:34:19 AM, you wrote: RFI>> I am wondering if anyone has got an EJB working on 3.0.4 with a RFI> property RFI>> which is stored as a serialized java object. Even the EJBs that RFI> worked RFI>> for me on 3.0.2 do no longer work on 3.0.4 if they have a property RFI> which RFI>> is of some Serializable type which is converted to BLOB. I am using RFI> Sap RFI>> DB. RFI>> My previous post contains the exceptions I get on 3.0.4. RFI>> Randahl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
