RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
You are amazing man ! I tried it. It works in terms of
all the things I had mentioned -
1. non-public
2. "is" for boolean
3. static
4. do not generater if already defined.
Not done -
5. no "set" for final variables
Only thing that could be improved upon is
a variable selection UI.
It could act as a quick look at
which variables have accessors
and mutators.
regards,
-sandip
-Original Message-
From: Javier Lopez
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/25/01 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
I sent an old file by mistake, this is the right one.
Javier
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
>
>
> Here is the prototype I promised.
> The method jde-wiz-get-set-methods
> will generate get/set method for all variables that
> are non public and non final declared in the current buffer.
> If the method is already defined in the buffer it won't be generated.
> The methods generated look like this
>
> /**
>* Gets the value of name
>*
>* @return the value of name
>*/
> public String getName() {
> return this.name;
> }
>
> /**
>* Sets the value of name
>*
>* @param name Value to assign to this.name
>*/
> public void setName(String name) {
> this.name = name;
> }
>
> Javier
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Javier Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:58 PM
> > To: Sandip Chitale; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> >
> >
> > if no one has started working on this I will try to get a prototype
> > working over the next few days. If someone already started
> doing something
> > please let me know, so I do not want to replicate work.
> >
> > Javier
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sandip Chitale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 2:58 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> > >
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be easy with Semantic.
> > > In fact, the function could show the list of
> > > non-public properties for which a getter/setter does not
> > > exist and let the user generate them in one shot
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > Class Class1
> > > TypeGetter
> > > Setter
> > > non-final non-public property1int [
> > > ]getProperty1
> > > [ ]setProperty1
> > > non-final non-public property2int
> > > getProperty2
> > > [ ]setProperty2
> > > final non-public property3int
[
> > > ]getProperty3
> > > non-final non-public property4boolean [
> > > ]isProperty4 [
> > > ]setProperty4
> > >
> > > Notice -
> > >
> > > . no "[ ]" for property2, if, say, getter already exists
> > > . missing "[ ]setProperty3" for final property3
> > > . isProperty4 instead of getProperty4 for boolean property4
> > > . auto insertion of static keyword for static properties
> > >
> > > etc. etc.
> > >
> > > Any takers ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Something similar exists in VAJ and its' cool !
> > >
> > >
> > > -sandip
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Daniel Hegyi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:43 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Is there a way to use the "Get/Set Pair..." template (or
another
> > > > >feature) to generate the get/set pairs for all class
> > > > variables already
> > > > >defined?
> > > > >
> > > > >I thought this feature existed, but must be dreaming (or maybe
a
> > > > >different tool?). I also didn't see anythning in the docs nor
> > > > >archives that answered this.
> > > >
> > > > I agree. This feature would be very cool. It exists in some
> > > > other IDEs and
> > > > it is very handy.
> > > >
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > >
_
> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
<>
RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
I sent an old file by mistake, this is the right one.
Javier
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
>
>
> Here is the prototype I promised.
> The method jde-wiz-get-set-methods
> will generate get/set method for all variables that
> are non public and non final declared in the current buffer.
> If the method is already defined in the buffer it won't be generated.
> The methods generated look like this
>
> /**
>* Gets the value of name
>*
>* @return the value of name
>*/
> public String getName() {
> return this.name;
> }
>
> /**
>* Sets the value of name
>*
>* @param name Value to assign to this.name
>*/
> public void setName(String name) {
> this.name = name;
> }
>
> Javier
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Javier Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:58 PM
> > To: Sandip Chitale; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> >
> >
> > if no one has started working on this I will try to get a prototype
> > working over the next few days. If someone already started
> doing something
> > please let me know, so I do not want to replicate work.
> >
> > Javier
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sandip Chitale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 2:58 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> > >
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be easy with Semantic.
> > > In fact, the function could show the list of
> > > non-public properties for which a getter/setter does not
> > > exist and let the user generate them in one shot
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > Class Class1
> > > TypeGetter
> > > Setter
> > > non-final non-public property1int [
> > > ]getProperty1
> > > [ ]setProperty1
> > > non-final non-public property2int
> > > getProperty2
> > > [ ]setProperty2
> > > final non-public property3int [
> > > ]getProperty3
> > > non-final non-public property4boolean [
> > > ]isProperty4 [
> > > ]setProperty4
> > >
> > > Notice -
> > >
> > > . no "[ ]" for property2, if, say, getter already exists
> > > . missing "[ ]setProperty3" for final property3
> > > . isProperty4 instead of getProperty4 for boolean property4
> > > . auto insertion of static keyword for static properties
> > >
> > > etc. etc.
> > >
> > > Any takers ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Something similar exists in VAJ and its' cool !
> > >
> > >
> > > -sandip
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Daniel Hegyi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:43 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: auto-gen get/set pairs for existing class variables
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Is there a way to use the "Get/Set Pair..." template (or another
> > > > >feature) to generate the get/set pairs for all class
> > > > variables already
> > > > >defined?
> > > > >
> > > > >I thought this feature existed, but must be dreaming (or maybe a
> > > > >different tool?). I also didn't see anythning in the docs nor
> > > > >archives that answered this.
> > > >
> > > > I agree. This feature would be very cool. It exists in some
> > > > other IDEs and
> > > > it is very handy.
> > > >
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
jde-wiz.el
A modest proposal for modularizing project support.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey. It seems to me that the JDE project support could benefit other languages and modes besides just Java. I often organize my local files into projects. Usually these include files that the JDE doesn't support (XML, XSL, etc). I think we should take the JDE project support and migrated it directly into a project-mode.el or a project.el package so that it is not JDE specific. I have a project-mode-name.el package on my website which tries to use the current directory to figure out a project name to use and then puts this on the modeline. It would be nice to rewrite this to support a prj.el mechanism similar to the JDE mechanism. I could also see adding additional support for WebCVS so that you can quickly jump to WebCVS from the current buffer based on project local variables. There is a lot of other stuff we could do. I would like to see a buffer-local-variable similar to "mode-name" but called "project-name" so that other major modes could use this variable. Thoughts just an idea. Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596 All the great empires of the future will be the empires of the mind. -- Winston Churchill -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt iD8DBQE7X2uzAwM6xb2dfE0RAn5RAJ9sEdFfOT4Cg0AiDTacTB7q3TxevwCfbZXe S9889JyFxPvGDpA5vSAG+P8= =ROZr -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: JDEBug var tree mouse button
You can also click the left button, then hit Enter :)
Process *JDEbug* not running, PLEASE HELP ! (more)
> > For starters you can > > 1. jdebug->process->start-debugger > > 2. set breakpoints in the code you want to debug > > 3. jde->debug-app > > When I follow this sequence, I have the following > output message: > > Process *JDEbug* not running I also want to says that, that the command jdebug->process->start-debugger really start the debugger, but when I call jde->debug-app, the debugger exists ! Joel ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Vos albums photos en ligne, Yahoo! Photos : http://fr.photos.yahoo.com
Viewing stack trace
Hi all, When stopped at a breakpoint I occasionally use the JDEbug->Stack-Up/Down feature to view the execution stack. I can't find a way to view the whole execution stack in a buffer, one frame per line, and to be able to select the frame to visit? This would be a very nice feature. thanks john ware
Process *JDEbug* not running, PLEASE HELP !
I will strongly suggest to read the manual. Aready done :-) > For starters you can > 1. jdebug->process->start-debugger > 2. set breakpoints in the code you want to debug > 3. jde->debug-app When I follow this sequence, I have the following output message: Process *JDEbug* not running > If you want to connect to the app through a port > you have to start your application with some flags > read the documentation for more info. > > Javier > Joel ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Vos albums photos en ligne, Yahoo! Photos : http://fr.photos.yahoo.com
RE: debugging, remote debugging, PROBLEMS
--- Javier Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will strongly suggest to read the manual. Paul will be so proud of you!!! ;-) = - Mr Lauren Commons A person of moderate zeal __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
JDEBug var tree mouse button
I've noticed that to expand a variable tree in JDEBug, you click the middle mouse button (which is a simulataneous left and right click on my two-button mouse). Is there a way to change this to be the left mouse button? Thanks. Steve Molitor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: debugging, remote debugging, PROBLEMS
I will strongly suggest to read the manual. For starters you can 1. jdebug->process->start-debugger 2. set breakpoints in the code you want to debug 3. jde->debug-app If you want to connect to the app through a port you have to start your application with some flags read the documentation for more info. Javier > I have 2 possibilities: > - either to start simply JDE -> debug app, and i have > the message: Process *JDEbug* not running. > > -either I launch my application in a JVM, and I > connect on a given port to this JVM with: and when I > want to launch my application, I can't ! because the > menu JDEbug -> Processes -> Launch process is not > active !! > > Thanks for the help > Joel > > > ___ > Do You Yahoo!? -- Vos albums photos en ligne, > Yahoo! Photos : http://fr.photos.yahoo.com >
debugging, remote debugging, PROBLEMS
Hi ! Can someone explain me how to debung application with JDebug ?? I have 2 possibilities: - either to start simply JDE -> debug app, and i have the message: Process *JDEbug* not running. -either I launch my application in a JVM, and I connect on a given port to this JVM with: and when I want to launch my application, I can't ! because the menu JDEbug -> Processes -> Launch process is not active !! Thanks for the help Joel ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Vos albums photos en ligne, Yahoo! Photos : http://fr.photos.yahoo.com
Re: jdebug prompts for source location
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Ross Ashley wrote: > I've set the jde-db-source-directories to the root of my > little test source tree, but when walking through a class in > the debugger, I get prompted for the location of the source > class. This prompt occurs at every step. > > Any ideas? my first guess would be that the root of your source tree is not located at the root of your package structure... PB>> > > -- > Ross Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things." > - George Carlin > Peter Brown Senior Staff Programmer Dept. of Computer Science140 Governors Drive University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003-4610 Phone: (413) 577-2505Fax: (413) 545-1249 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.umass.edu/~pbrown
jdebug prompts for source location
I've set the jde-db-source-directories to the root of my little test source tree, but when walking through a class in the debugger, I get prompted for the location of the source class. This prompt occurs at every step. Any ideas? -- Ross Ashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things." - George Carlin
Re: Gift(s) for Paul
Its a problem isn't it... I'm not sure where to start, but does the FSF have anything that could be used in this situation? cheers dim On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:03, Richard den Adel wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been rough for Paul the last days and it ain't over yet. > > We know he is on vacation right now, I think this is a good time to give > something back to Paul. > A gift of us all, the JDE users community. Just to let him know he's not > alone and its greatly appreciated what he has done in the past years. > > Ofcourse anyone can send him a gift, but it is not the same as something > comming from the JDE community. > > I don't know how to start something like that, how to collect money (or > presents), and how to send it to Paul. > > Time is short, but I think it is possible. > > Any idea's, comments? > > Richard.
RE: mode line
Never mind... I was looking for ecb-minor-mode-text >From Klaus: > Many minor-modes offer a option where you can specify the > name of the minor-mode displayed in the modeline. > E.g.: > - Senator: senator-mode > - ECB: ecb-minor-mode-text > So you can set this options to very short names to save modeline-space. > But a minor-mode name must always begin with a single space " "! /joel > -Original Message- > From: Joel Metelius > Sent: den 25 juli 2001 11:18 > To: Berndl, Klaus > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: mode line > > > Just like senator-minor-mode-name, to be able to change the name > displayed for the minor mode. > > Instead of for example: > (require 'diminish) > (diminish 'abbrev-mode "Ab") > (diminish 'ecb-minor-mode "E") > > /joel > > > -Original Message- > > From: Berndl, Klaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: den 25 juli 2001 10:16 > > To: Joel Metelius; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: mode line > > > > > > >Maybe a mode-line-name would be something for the ECB. > > > > What do you mean with this? > > > > Klaus > > >
