Re: [jdev] decentralized omniscience
On Mar 16, 2013 8:11 AM, Justin Karneges jus...@affinix.com wrote: ** In thinking about federated social networks, I started to wonder if certain features enjoyed in monolithic systems might not carry over very well to our world. There are many situations where Facebook tailors your view based on its all-knowing graph database, but these kinds of things may be hard to pull off when there isn't any all-knowing entity. Take, for example, the case of viewing a Facebook post that contains many likes. If any of your friends liked the post, then their identities will be placed in the data summarization of that post. This scales well, too. A public post which might have 1 likes will still manage to include your 1 friend that liked the post in the summary. I'm not sure if it's possible for these kinds of features to exist fully decentralized (or at least not without it being insanely complex), but we of course we don't want a wholly centralized system either. Maybe there's a middleground, whereby complex brainpower can be offloaded to special services dedicated to the task, without putting everything in that basket. I'm thinking of a model like the web and search engines. The web is functional without Google, but Google adds a lot of all-knowing value to those who wish to use it. So, perhaps services like Buddycloud could take care of all the storage, actions, federation, etc, but then separate smart searchy entities could be optionally integrated to augment the experience. The reason I bring this up here is to discuss some protocol. I think all that is really needed for a system like this to work is for the smart entity to act as a proxy. So, when fetching a post, you'd send a request to the smart entity, which then requests out to the post source. If the post has 1 likes, then the smart entity would need to download all of these and create a customized summarization to be returned to the initial requester. Oh, and of course we'd need a way for the post source to validate that the smart entity can act on behalf of the initial requester. The smart entity should not have full access to everything, but only what it is able to see based its users. The end result is that there isn't necessarily any smart entity that knows *everything*, but perhaps several that independently know enough to get the job done for their users. Like search engines on the web, these smart entities of federated social networks could be proactive in crawling, subscribing to, and caching data, such that in many cases they will immediately have answers for their users without needing to proxy out every time. Perhaps this could be accomplished with something like XEP-291 (to allow your JID to vouch for a third party JID allowed to act as you), and SHIM (for the proxied request to stamp who the original requester was). Is that it? Can anyone think of a smart feature they've seen on Facebook or Google+ that could not be accomplished with this very simple protocol? Maybe there are some features that absolutely require a central entity? Justin ___ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___ ___ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___
Re: [jdev] XMPP and Facebook
Ha, well yes there is a place for political discussions here at times in technical forums. That is why I am on this list. Just look at where Eric Schmidt from Google is today, or at least he was there yesterday I believe, North Korea. But yes for sure it has to be within reason and limited in focus/scope. So after being a very silent member to this list for the past 4 or 5 years, I will say I remember very vividly the day I sat down with the director of marketing at facebook in their at the time very small corporate offices in Palo Alto and talking about XMPP and using IM on the fb platform, etc. I think they might have had a couple of million registered users at the time. MySpace owned the world at the time. A lot has changed in XMPP and social networking worlds since then. And yes, it sure would be useful and cool to add one more level of unified communications into the Social Networking world. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Dennis Schubert x...@dennis-schubert.dewrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, you are right, never was a bit too hard. I just was talking about what I heard from some official sides before. Just wanted to say that would be a pretty nice improvement. Seems to work fine for Google, but this list is not the right place for policital discussions, I guess. On 08.01.13 08:39, Pedro Melo wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Dennis Schubert x...@dennis-schubert.de wrote: IIRC, Facebook will never allow s2s. Never is one of those words… There is no technical reason that prevents Facebook providing S2S. Even with their usage of your own email address as login. When you add a new buddy to your Facebook chat app, say m...@simplicidade.org, they could offer the option of using my Facebook IM account (mel...@facebook.com, who they know is associated with that email address) or a remote Jabber/Gtalk/XMPP account. The person identifier you use to add a buddy needs not be the actual XMPP JID you'll use to communicate. It's just a mapping process at the moment you add the buddy account. Only political/strategy reasons, and possibly a little concern with another attack vector, prevent Facebook from adding S2S. Bye, - -- Dennis Schubert http://schub.io xmpp:densc...@dsx.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ69BpAAoJEOlJwL026k+ux2MIAKH6sxk+OYTYp250Zb/sP3rI J4LtZpXf3ixlRzvMVc3JOZQgbe2MnTIbkLQ5Yvr1A328eB1XGrJrTg38eq0ri+xB PEsawi6IIBlmsm0NroseMoxWeriPi1IQsL0S58lLtWyv+UKNKTGlRs+NM1iRA5mG D0liJPZZm48MKlS6RXrStBkeWb68ccVfVvr1AVidrNo3YjCu1wqpwHa6rqIwZ9k3 LYnfKVUIZus+/nVdXOzkaqBwWgdxr/OpdjUMdw8SHSxQAsVhLIo1bHi8tYiQMNXU UqmZ17+lDdidTpwpQpBXAQZcpTgz+4gzrmO2lvIEyfzG1tpSX/aa68j9S4b65v0= =41Tm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___ -- *G e o f L a m b e r t* *9 1 6 2 2 5 6 7 6 9* * * *ProArts Advertising Production Brochurehttp://proartsmedia.com/ProArtsBrochureSpreads.pdf * ProArts is a full-service Advertising Agency Production company devoted to assisting you to be as effective as possible. Be it an advertising campaign, a video production, or an event, we work closely with you to understand your needs and to make your dream a reality. *Geof Lambert Profile* http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert ___ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___
[jdev] IPv6 transition related to XMPP progress
This list might be of interest to the group: http://www.mrp.net/IPv6_Survey.html During a recent Joint Techs meeting at Fermilab Ron Broersma of Defense Research and Engineering Network (DREN) included a scorecard in his presentation that tried to quantify how well major organisations were embracing IPv6. I thought that this was such a fine idea that I’ve decided to replicate it here. I started by grabbing a list of organisations associated with Internet2 from their web site and tried to work out their domains... ..While some ISPs might argue that their networks support IPv6 (and that they use it every day) because they have an IPv6 prefix that is announced to the world I tend to believe in “eating ones own dog food” and so it’s more important to be seen to be using it in some meaningful way rather than potentially have a single host generate a suitable BGP announcement. Therefore like Ron I have identified some services and use them as an indicator of usage. 1. 1.Web server accessible via IPv6; 2. 2.Email deliverable via IPv6; 3. 3.DNS name servers accessible via IPv6; 4. 4.An NTP service accessible via IPv6; and 5. 5.A Jabber service accessible via IPv6 Partial points are awarded if you have an accessible “www.ipv6.$domain” site. I also now look for “ipv6.$domain” too but that’s the limit. I think a “normal” user would give up after trying them, assuming they even try. Find the list and link here: http://www.mrp.net/IPv6_Survey.html Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Chat Google Talk: geof.lambert Skype: geof.lambert MSN: geof.lamb...@gmail.com Contact Me [image: Linkedin] http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert[image: Facebook] http://www.facebook.com/geof.lambert[image: Twitter]http://twitter.com/digitaldivide Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Chat Google Talk: geof.lambert Skype: geof.lambert MSN: geof.lamb...@gmail.com Contact Me [image: Linkedin] http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert[image: Facebook] http://www.facebook.com/geof.lambert[image: Twitter]http://twitter.com/digitaldivide ___ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___
Re: [jdev] Wikipedia deletions
Good points and discussion. In this case a center critical mass will probably prove more productive them dispersed bits of information. And it is difficult to reason with Wiki when they have their minds made up on something. Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Chat: Google Talk: geof.lambert Skype: geof.lambert MSN: geof.lamb...@gmail.com Contact Me: [image: Linkedin] http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert[image: Facebook] http://www.facebook.com/geof.lambert[image: Twitter]http://twitter.com/digitaldivide On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote: Someone at Wikipedia is actively working to delete entries about various software projects that supposedly fail Wikipedia's notability test. Pages about some XMPP software projects have already been deleted (e.g., Coccinella) and it seems that others will be deleted in the near future (e.g., Exodus, Gajim, ejabberd). Yesterday I reviewed the some of the discussions about these pages, and in my opinion the deletionists are not very open to reasoned argument. While we could spend a lot of time trying to fight these deletions, I think it would be more productive to move these pages over to wiki.xmpp.org and make that the most accurate source for information about XMPP technologies (along with the regular xmpp.org site). Naturally, you are free to spend time and energy on Wikipedia, but I think the site is a lost cause, so I am going to spend my time and energy on a wiki where our work won't be deleted because someone has some misguided ideas about notability. If you'd like to help build out wiki.xmpp.org, feel free to ask one of the sysops there for an account. Typically the sysops hang out in the j...@conference.jabber.org chatroom. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ ___ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___ ___ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___
Re: [jdev] a vision
Awesomelooks like a great vision to me! Hope it becomes a reality. Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Chat: Google Talk: geof.lambert Skype: geof.lambert MSN: geof.lamb...@gmail.com Contact Me: [image: Linkedin] http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert[image: Twitter] http://twitter.com/digitaldivide[image: MySpace]http://www.myspace.com/greenprotocol On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote: As posted at my blog *** I have this vision for jabber.org services: 1. A clean and simple website with minimal text that will help end users get started with Jabber. 2. Web chat for a real-time window into one end-user chatroom and one developer chatroom (and perhaps one additional room, such as a language-specific or country-specific room). 3. Internationalized versions of everything so that volunteers around the world can run sites like de.jabber.org (Germany) and pt.jabber.org (Portugal). 4. Extension of this international model to XMPP services, so that we can run SOCKS5 data proxies for file transfer and TURN media relays for voice+video all over the world (we'll need to convince companies and ISPs and non-profit organizations that this is in their interest, since they are the people with the bandwidth). For me the idea here is that jabber.org will be the community-driven running code laboratory for the formal rough consensus technologies produced by the XMPP Standards Foundation. The goal is to build an open and distributed IM, presence, data, and VoIP service that can provide a realistic alternative to closed systems like Skype. None of this would be exclusive. We'd still strongly encourage people to run their own XMPP services and join the network. But we'd also work hard to have worldwide coverage under the jabber.org banner. Call this Jabber 2.0 if you must. In any case, I think it's time for a strong community centered at jabber.org to provide technology leadership in the communication space and thus help us all achieve the original mission that Jeremie Miller set out long ago: freedom of conversation. *** ___ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___ ___ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org ___
Re: [jdev] Jabber Trademark
As one of the few marketing folks here on this list, I'll interject my 2 cents which I very rarely do, and say based on the official press release by Cisco corporateI would not put a bet on In the end, perhaps Jabber will mean nothing at all. in the future... Note not once are the characters XMPP typed together in the release of Jabber, Inc. acquisition..do you think that was by design, or by accident? SAN JOSE, Calif. - Sept. 19, 2008 - Cisco today announced its intent to acquire privately held Jabber, Inc., a provider of presence and messaging software. Based in Denver, Jabber will work with Cisco to enhance the existing presence and messaging functions of Cisco's Collaboration portfolio. [image: Cisco Announces Definitive Agreement to Acquire Jabber] The acquisition will enable Cisco to embed presence and messaging services in the network and provide rich aggregation capabilities to users through both on-premise and on-demand solutions, across multiple platforms including Cisco WebEx(R) Connect and Cisco Unified Communications. Enterprise organizations want an extensible presence and messaging platform that can integrate with business process applications and easily adapt to their changing needs, said Doug Dennerline, Cisco senior vice president, Collaboration Software Group. With the acquisition of Jabber, we will be able to extend the reach of our current instant messaging service and expand the capabilities of our collaboration platform. Our intention is to be the interoperability benchmark in the collaboration space. Jabber provides a carrier-grade, best-in-class presence and messaging platform. Jabber's technology leverages open standards to provide a highly scalable architecture that supports the aggregation of presence information across different devices, users and applications. The technology also enables collaboration across many different presence systems such as Microsoft Office Communications Server, IBM Sametime, AOL AIM, Google and Yahoo!. Jabber's platform leads the market in system robustness, scalability, extensibility and global distribution. The Jabber acquisition exemplifies Cisco's build, buy and partner innovation strategy to move quickly into new markets and capture key market transitions. In addition to internal software innovations, Cisco actively employs investments in, and acquisitions of, other companies to support its software strategy; recent purchases include industry leaders WebEx, IronPort, Securent and PostPath. The transaction will be accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial terms of the transaction are undisclosed. The acquisition is subject to various standard closing conditions and is expected to be complete in Cisco's first half of fiscal year 2009. Upon completion of the acquisition, Jabber employees will become part of the Cisco Collaboration Software Group (CSG). CSG is part of the recently established Software Group, consisting of Cisco's major software businesses; including the IOS network operating system, network and service management, Unified Communications solutions, policy management, and SaaS offerings. About Cisco Systems Cisco, (NASDAQ: CSCO), is the worldwide leader in networking that transforms how people connect, communicate and collaborate. Information about Cisco can be found at http://www.cisco.com. For ongoing news, please go to http://newsroom.cisco.com. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: 2008/9/23 Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]: snip The term Jabber has always meant many things (an open-source server, a company, a protocol, etc.) and we've worked to disambiguate those meanings over time (jabberd, Jabber Inc., XMPP). If Jabber Inc. goes away, then one of the sources of confusion disappears. In the end, perhaps Jabber will mean nothing at all. ;-) Wrong: Jabber is listed in the dictionary; XMPP is not listed (yet ;-) ). -- Mvg, Sander Devrieze. ___ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ -- Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/GeofLambert WorldBridge Partners Digital Native Studios The New Internet based on IPv6 Rotary Club of Sacramento GREEN PROTOCOL WG Want to see me live? I video broadcast from: www.Vidder.com/MetroNet6 ___ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
Re: [jdev] Jabber Trademark
a wise old man once told me, Geof, right or WRONG, sometimes perception becomes reality. Do you not think Bill Gates and company would like to go back in time and set the record straight on somethings that have morphed from perception into reality? On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: naw wrote: To me, it seems that Cisco is trying to confuse people and make them think that Cisco is the owner of the protocol/IM system/comunity. Fortunately, you are wrong. /psa ___ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ -- Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/GeofLambert WorldBridge Partners Digital Native Studios The New Internet based on IPv6 Rotary Club of Sacramento GREEN PROTOCOL WG Want to see me live? I video broadcast from: www.Vidder.com/MetroNet6 ___ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
Re: [jdev] Facebook to Jabber Gateway?
FYI...one of the first Facebook apps was Coversant SoapBox which provides an XMPP messenger app to Facebook. Was up last summer. JD Conelly spearheaded that effort. On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Magnus Henoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Florian Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: is there any transport for Facebook? It would be nice to see something like that, especially as f8 does XML. This site does something similar: http://social.im/ You get a new JID, whose roster automagically contains your Facebook friends. -- Magnus JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/GeofLambert WorldBridge Partners Digital Native Studios IPv6 Forum Rotary Club of Sacramento
Re: [jdev] IPv6 readyness?
Chris Mullins at Microsoft is a good resource on this topic, and also if anybody runs into any specific issues or IPv6 questions, please be sure to let me know. I am chair of the California IPv6 Task Force and am a leader with the global IPv6 Forum. FYI, there is an IPv6 Ready program and if anybody is interested they can visit www.IPv6Forum.com and learn more about it. Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/GeofLambert WorldBridge Partners Digital Native Studios IPv6 Forum Rotary Club of Sacramento On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Am Mi, 16.04.2008, 14:49, schrieb Paul van Tilburg: Our Jabber server (jabberd14 code base) has been running on our IPv6 network for over 4 years without any problems. Same here, jabberd14 server is still running since 2004 in a ipv4/ipv6 environment without any problems. Cheers /m -- mail/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]PGP key available -- --
[jdev] Fwd: [Nav6tf] Results of ARIN/CAIDA IPv6 Penetration Survey
One more piece of useful IPv6 info see below just in this week from ARIN and CAIDA...and a good resource Wiki. The North American IPv6 Task Force is in the process of developing an IPv6 Knowledge Base which should be live fairly soon. Geof Lambert IPv6 Forum -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Jimmerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:22 AM Subject: [Nav6tf] Results of ARIN/CAIDA IPv6 Penetration Survey To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) and the Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA) worked together to conduct a survey to capture IPv6 penetration data in the ARIN region. The survey took place in March of 2008 and an analysis of the results was presented by kc claffy of CAIDA during the ARIN XXI meeting in Denver, Colorado, last week. You can find the link to this presentation on the top-right corner of ARIN's IPv6 wiki at: http://www.getipv6.info We encourage community members to post IPv6 experiences, knowledge and resources on the ARIN IPv6 wiki. Also, be sure to check back there soon for data from the 8 April ARIN IPv6 Main Event, where participants connected to an IPv6-only network. Regards, Richard Jimmerson Chief Information Officer American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ___ Nav6tf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ipv6forum.com/mailman/listinfo/nav6tf -- Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769 Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/GeofLambert WorldBridge Partners Digital Native Studios IPv6 Forum Rotary Club of Sacramento
Re: [jdev] Google Androïd SDK not XMPP compliant ?
Good clarification.. Thanks Peter! Geof On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: biojab biojab wrote: http://code.google.com/android/migrating/m3-to-m5/m5-api-changes.html#gtalk First of all, don't panic. As I understand it from one of the Android team members, they have been using XMPP communications (sent only via the Google Talk service) as a way for developers to debug their code by sending handset-to-handset messages. This usage was quite limited and the server was hardcoded to talk.google.com for that reason. This package was never intended for broader use, e.g. as a general messaging service that could be used for all the things we're familiar with from the XMPP universe (presence, IM, RPC, Jingle, etc.). Naturally if developers want a more robust messaging service that they could hook up to their own XMPP servers, they could simply use a full XMPP library (a likely candidate is Smack, since Android is all Java all the time). Since Android was never doing anything very extensive with XMPP, it's not exactly the end of the world that they are more clearly labelling this package as a GTalk-only debug channel. Now, whether it would be better for Android in the long run if they were doing something more extensive with XMPP is another question... :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -- Geof Sent from my Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 916.225.6769 IPv6 Forum www.IPv6Forum.com North American IPv6 Task Force www.NAv6TF.org California IPv6 Task Force www.CAv6TF.org
Re: [jdev] Announcement of ejabberd 2.0.0-rc1
awesome! exciting news...looking forward to checking it out. Sounds like you have made some great enhancements keep up the good work! Geof Lambert IPv6 Forum On 1/18/08, Mickaël Rémond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, ejabberd 2.0.0 has been in the works since more than a year ago. This release will include an impressive amount of new features, improvements and bug fixes. Just to name two: more clustering features and updated Pub-Sub service with PEP support. Please read with detail the Release Notes for a list of changes and important notes: http://svn.process-one.net/ejabberd/branches/ejabberd-2.0.x/doc/release_notes_2.0.0.txt But the final release of ejabberd 2.0.0 is not ready yet. Right now it's time for Release Candidate 1. Three weeks ago Beta1 was published (although not widely announced). Several people reported important bugs that are now fixed in RC1. You can check the tickets concerning Beta1 that are fixed in RC1 [1] and the SVN log since Beta1 was released until RC1 [2]. Source code and binary installers are available as usual in the downloads page: http://www.process-one.net/en/ejabberd/downloads To formally report bugs please use the ejabberd bug tracker: http://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB You can also discuss any issue in this ejabberd mailing list, or in the ejabberd forums: http://www.ejabberd.im/forum [1] https://support.process-one.net/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10011fixfor=10050version=10180sorter/field=issuekeysorter/order=DESC [2] https://forge.process-one.net/changelog/ejabberd/branches/ejabberd-2.0.x?todate%3D1200478574156 Have fun ! -- Mickaël Rémond http://www.process-one.net/ -- Geof Sent from my Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 916.225.6769 IPv6 Forum www.IPv6Forum.com North American IPv6 Task Force www.NAv6TF.org California IPv6 Task Force www.CAv6TF.org
[jdev] XMPP testing for compatibility to IPv6 at the University of New Hampshire Interoperability Labs
Does anybody have anything in the XMPP world they would like tested for compatibility to IPv6 at the University of New Hampshire Interoperability Labs... http://www.iol.unh.edu/general/ If so, let me know and I'll try to hook you up with some testing that is going to be taking place there later this year.. These labs host MoonV6 some background on MoonV6: What is Moonv6? The Moonv6 project is a global effort led by the *North American IPv6 Task Force* (NAv6TF http://www.nav6tf.org/ ) involving the*University of New Hampshire - InterOperability Laboratory* (UNH-IOLhttp://www.iol.unh.edu/index.php), *Internet2 http://internet2.edu/*, vendors http://www.moonv6.com/vendor/, service providers and regional IPv6 Forum Task Force network pilots worldwide. Taking place across the U.S. at multiple locations, the Moonv6 project is the largest permanently deployed multi-vendor IPv6 network in the world. The U.S. Government's Department of Defense *Joint Interoperability Testing Command* (JITC http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/) and other government agencies, the Defense Research Engineering Network (DREN) and the High Performance Computing Modernization Program (HPCMP) also play significant roles in the Moonv6 demonstrations ensuring DoD interoperability and migration objectives are identified and demonstrated. Cheers! Geof Lambert Coversant, Inc. IPv6 Forum North American IPv6 Task Force California IPv6 Task Force On 8/10/07, Jonathan Chayce Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 16:56 -0400, rek2GNU/Linux wrote: Jonathan Chayce Dickinson escribió: Hey People, No, this is not another request for a jabber server (I think it deserves an acronym as it comes up so often: YARFAS - Yet Another Request For A Server ;) ). Anyway, I am coding an Jabber server in Ruby, and I am hosting it on Google Code. So I am looking for contributors/developers. RJabberD is a Ruby Jabber server. Emphasis is placed on the Jabber portion, that is, the server is not designed purely for XMPP: all functionaly will be provided via plugins. Shout if you can help. Cheers, Jonathan Dickinson hey Awesome!! started to code on Ruby I love it!! not sure if I have the time to help but keep me in the loop Yeah, it's also my first major project in Ruby (besides Rails). I have been programming in C# for 6-7 years now (since Beta 1), so it will be a learning curve for me: hopefully a good one. I'm still early on in the implementation (still experimenting with Ruby sockets), but I'm getting places. Have a look at the Wiki and see if you can find anything that would interest/challenge you and have a go at it, any small amount of code would be great. Cheers, Jonathan Dickinson -- Geof Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 916.225.6769 IPv6 Forum www.IPv6Forum.com North American IPv6 Task Force www.NAv6TF.org California IPv6 Task Force www.CAv6TF.org DMT Forum Digital Mental Telepathy Not about if. It's about when. www.Digaria.com
[jdev] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Geof Lambert requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- Artur, Here is invitation to join my LinkedIn network if you'd like to expand your circle out a little wider add me to your network. Cheers! -Geof View invitation from Geof Lambert http://www.linkedin.com/e/vNGFHWSvG0WC6SmjzD7BqyHcOt/blk/148995840_2/cBYMd3wRejAUd34LqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/ -- Fact: Harvard Business School graduates have 58 connections each (average) -- (c) 2007, LinkedIn Corporation
Re: [jdev] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Gees, I have no ideai sent out an automated LinkedIn invite this a.m. to catch up on people I have recently been in communication over past month or so that developer email list must have been buried in there accidentally since I just requested an add to it earlier this week. I'll take a look and see. Geof On 7/5/07, Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geof Lambert wrote: Geof Lambert requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: Artur, Does Artur list his email address as jdev@jabber.org on LinkedIn? /psa -- Geof Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 916.225.6769 IPv6 Forum www.IPv6Forum.com North American IPv6 Task Force www.NAv6TF.org California IPv6 Task Force www.CAv6TF.org DMT Forum Digital Mental Telepathy Not about if. It's about when. www.Digaria.com
[jdev] Non-developer message...
This message isn't developer oriented, but this appears to be the closest list I could find appropriate to send this message.. My name is Geof Lambert, I just submitted an application for membership to the XMPP Foundation to learn more about XMPP and meet those interested in seeing it more widely adopted. If anybody has any questions about my background, let me know! I'd be happy to provide more insight and information. -- Geof Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 916.225.6769 IPv6 Forum www.IPv6Forum.com North American IPv6 Task Force www.NAv6TF.org California IPv6 Task Force www.CAv6TF.org DMT Forum Digital Mental Telepathy Not about if. It's about when. www.Digaria.com
