Re: [JDEV] Re: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > temas wrote: > > > This is one of the exact goals of the Foundation, to have a formalized > > process for working on the protocol. Jabelin will then be the group to > > work on server development. Some more info about this should be out > > today or tomorrow. > > > Well, Jabelin will be the group to work on server development for the > reference implementation, not for every server implementation, right? At > least such is my understanding... :) Yup. Diz ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
Re: [JDEV] Re: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
temas wrote: > This is one of the exact goals of the Foundation, to have a formalized > process for working on the protocol. Jabelin will then be the group to > work on server development. Some more info about this should be out > today or tomorrow. Well, Jabelin will be the group to work on server development for the reference implementation, not for every server implementation, right? At least such is my understanding... :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
All too true (your being right, of course). But the "elegance" concept is a philosphy, not based on any language. Far too few who call themselves "programmers" possess it. -Original Message- From: Max Metral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 14:07 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server) ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
Well, I'm not really sure that any amount of elegance would cause a perl program to run faster than a similarly elegant C++ one... I don't want to get into a language war, but since I'm right there will be no need for one. ;) -Original Message- From: Ted Rolle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 4:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server) > It seems like the prototyping point here is the strongest. From a perf > perspective, C/C++ all the way seems pretty important for carriers and large > ISPs (like us if I may be so bold), but not for people tooling around with > new features... If we all agree with this, the nice thing might be that a > second/alternate language version would have an EXPLICIT goal of being > readable and modifiable and NOT being efficient or cheaply/quickly scalable. These goals are not mutually exclusive. The meeting/common point is called "elegance". ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
RE: [JDEV] RE: Implementing Jabber Server in other Languages (Was RE: [JDEV] Cus tomizing Jabber server)
> It seems like the prototyping point here is the strongest. From a perf > perspective, C/C++ all the way seems pretty important for carriers and large > ISPs (like us if I may be so bold), but not for people tooling around with > new features... If we all agree with this, the nice thing might be that a > second/alternate language version would have an EXPLICIT goal of being > readable and modifiable and NOT being efficient or cheaply/quickly scalable. These goals are not mutually exclusive. The meeting/common point is called "elegance". ___ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
