[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

2014-01-17 Thread Craig L Russell (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13874958#comment-13874958
 ] 

Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728:
-

Don't we need a test case for this?

 extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations 
 are needed.
 ---

 Key: JDO-728
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728
 Project: JDO
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: api, specification, tck
Affects Versions: JDO 3 update 1 (3.0.1)
Reporter: Baris ERGUN
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: JDO-728.patch


 JDO XSD for  XML MetaData supports extension tag. But  @Index does not have 
 such elements. Ie I cannot specify @Index(members = {sample}, 
 extension=..). Hope this will be included in new releases. The extension 
 is used by ORM Frameworks in order to specify Index access method such HASH, 
 GIST etc ... (these are postgresql specific)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 17, 8:30 am Pacific Time

2014-01-17 Thread Craig L Russell 
Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell

Agenda:

1. JDO release JDO 3.1-rc1: JDO web site updates

no change. Download always comes from maven central. Artifacts are not (yet) 
pushed to mirrors. Which might mean that the jdo artifacts are not in the right 
place in the apache distribution directory?

2. News on JDO-625 Support for streams 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625 ?

no change.

3. News on JDO-712 Require using the PMF schema definition with sequence 
names https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712 ?

Question: what is the default for databases that don't support sequences per 
schema.

4. Updates on JIRA JDO-728 extention element for @Index annotation is needed: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728

Patch looks good. Just need a spec update now. Simple enough. No objections 
from anyone to including this in the 3.1 release.

Is there a DataNucleus release that supports this feature?

Do we have a test case?

5. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:
[Jan 10 2014] AI Michelle resolve JDO-723

This issue should be updated only after we resolve the apache dist issue (#1 
above).

[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as 
persistent field types
[Oct 25 2013] AI We still need to merge changes from the 3.1-rc1 branch to the 
trunk.
[May 10 2013] AI Everyone take a look Apache ISIS and maybe subscribe to ISIS 
mail lists.
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about 
JDOHelper methods. In process.
[Aug 17 2012] AI Craig comment on JIRA JDO-589 Autocommit or nontransactional 
action

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

2014-01-17 Thread Andy Jefferson (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13875047#comment-13875047
 ] 

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-728:


How are you going to test something that is a vendor extension? Only thing I 
can see is testing that the metadata API returns the extension specified, but 
then that just tests processing of the annotations, not of the actual extension.

 extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations 
 are needed.
 ---

 Key: JDO-728
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728
 Project: JDO
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: api, specification, tck
Affects Versions: JDO 3 update 1 (3.0.1)
Reporter: Baris ERGUN
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: JDO-728.patch


 JDO XSD for  XML MetaData supports extension tag. But  @Index does not have 
 such elements. Ie I cannot specify @Index(members = {sample}, 
 extension=..). Hope this will be included in new releases. The extension 
 is used by ORM Frameworks in order to specify Index access method such HASH, 
 GIST etc ... (these are postgresql specific)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

2014-01-17 Thread Craig L Russell (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13875112#comment-13875112
 ] 

Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728:
-

@Andy: Right. I was thinking of the extension in the xsd but this is the API.

 extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations 
 are needed.
 ---

 Key: JDO-728
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728
 Project: JDO
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: api, specification, tck
Affects Versions: JDO 3 update 1 (3.0.1)
Reporter: Baris ERGUN
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: JDO-728.patch


 JDO XSD for  XML MetaData supports extension tag. But  @Index does not have 
 such elements. Ie I cannot specify @Index(members = {sample}, 
 extension=..). Hope this will be included in new releases. The extension 
 is used by ORM Frameworks in order to specify Index access method such HASH, 
 GIST etc ... (these are postgresql specific)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)