Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
Yes, Maven seemingly also looks under xdocs for documents to render on the site (not mentioned in its docs), as well as the standard location (mentioned in all its docs of src/site). Just move the existing Maven1-based xdocs to a different location and then run mvn site. The intention is to delete that directory when it is generated to people's satisfaction. I've also updated it now to not generate various mindless Maven reports that don't appear on the site. -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
On 1/14/2013 1:19 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: Yes, Maven seemingly also looks under xdocs for documents to render on the site (not mentioned in its docs), as well as the standard location (mentioned in all its docs of src/site). Just move the existing Maven1-based xdocs to a different location and then run mvn site. The intention is to delete that directory when it is generated to people's satisfaction. I've also updated it now to not generate various mindless Maven reports that don't appear on the site. Andy, thanks. It runs fine with xdocs moved and produces good output. Does docs/navigation.html need to be svn added? I do get a lot of warnings like this: [WARNING] [XHTML Sink] No HTML tag found for unknown event: 'B', ignoring! -- Michelle
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
Andy, thanks. It runs fine with xdocs moved and produces good output. Does docs/navigation.html need to be svn added? I do get a lot of warnings like this: [WARNING] [XHTML Sink] No HTML tag found for unknown event: 'B', ignoring! docs/navigation.xml isn't present in SVN as far as I can see. I've now removed the Maven1 xdocs and project files from SVN trunk. All that is needed is for someone to update docs. Sadly I tried that and I just get some nonsense message svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: The specified baseline is not the latest baseline, so it may not be checked out. svn: E175002: CHECKOUT of '/repos/infra/!svn/bln/846696': 409 Conflict (https://svn.apache.org) svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: The specified baseline is not the latest baseline, so it may not be checked out. svn: E175002: CHECKOUT of '/repos/infra/!svn/bln/846696': 409 Conflict (https://svn.apache.org) Perhaps someone who understand this svn:externals knows what the problem is and update it? -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
I've now removed the Maven1 xdocs and project files from SVN trunk. All that is needed is for someone to update docs. Sadly I tried that and I just get some nonsense message svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: The specified baseline is not the latest baseline, so it may not be checked out. svn: E175002: CHECKOUT of '/repos/infra/!svn/bln/846696': 409 Conflict (https://svn.apache.org) svn: E190003: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E190003: The specified baseline is not the latest baseline, so it may not be checked out. svn: E175002: CHECKOUT of '/repos/infra/!svn/bln/846696': 409 Conflict (https://svn.apache.org) Perhaps someone who understand this svn:externals knows what the problem is and update it? Works when done from the command line, seems to be just Eclipse SVN plugin throwing its toys out of the pram. All should now be in SVN. Enjoy -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
No objections from me. I think an upgrade is a good idea . Thanks! -- Michelle 1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:46 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: 1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? None at all. Go for it. Commit then Review. Craig -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus) Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? I've checked into SVN the Maven2 site. This is comprised of src/ directory, including all xdocs and resources as before, but with XSD's defined and formatting updated so they match XSD. pom.xml Just do mvn clean site and it generates the site under target/site. If people can try it and see if it works for everyone, then I can delete the old xdocs directory as well as maven.xml, project.xml, project.properties -- Andy DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus)
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
On 1/13/2013 10:09 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: 1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? I've checked into SVN the Maven2 site. This is comprised of src/ directory, including all xdocs and resources as before, but with XSD's defined and formatting updated so they match XSD. pom.xml Just do mvn clean site and it generates the site under target/site. If people can try it and see if it works for everyone, then I can delete the old xdocs directory as well as maven.xml, project.xml, project.properties I get an error building the site: 7K downloaded (maven-default-skin-1.0.jar) [INFO] Rendering site with org.apache.maven.skins:maven-default-skin:jar:1.0 skin. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error during page generation Embedded error: Files 'xdoc\attach_detach.xml' clashes with existing 'C:\jdo\site\src\site\xdoc\attach_detach.xml'. [INFO] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 33 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sun Jan 13 18:29:47 MST 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 46M/528M [INFO]
Re: Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
On 1/13/2013 6:35 PM, Michelle Caisse wrote: On 1/13/2013 10:09 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: 1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? Not used Maven1 in some time and don't know what the problem is, but I could try converting it to Maven2+ so then there is no requirement for Maven1 in the Apache JDO project. I did the same for DataNucleus docs a while back. Any objections ? I've checked into SVN the Maven2 site. This is comprised of src/ directory, including all xdocs and resources as before, but with XSD's defined and formatting updated so they match XSD. pom.xml Just do mvn clean site and it generates the site under target/site. If people can try it and see if it works for everyone, then I can delete the old xdocs directory as well as maven.xml, project.xml, project.properties I get an error building the site: 7K downloaded (maven-default-skin-1.0.jar) [INFO] Rendering site with org.apache.maven.skins:maven-default-skin:jar:1.0 skin. [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] [INFO] Error during page generation Embedded error: Files 'xdoc\attach_detach.xml' clashes with existing 'C:\jdo\site\src\site\xdoc\attach_detach.xml'. [INFO] [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 33 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sun Jan 13 18:29:47 MST 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 46M/528M [INFO] When I delete xdocs locally, it all works. It appears, though, that there are a few files generated in target/site that are unversioned in docs, for example license.html. That may be a pre-existing problem. -- Michelle
Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday January 11, 9 am Pacific Time
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Matthew Adams, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Problem building site There is still an issue with building the site. Seems to be a maven repository variable issue reported as a missing dependency. The site is published as it existed a few months ago but can't be updated (generated) as the instructions in site/HOWTO don't currently work. maven.repo.remote needs to be set. Does anyone know how to fix this? 2. News on JDO-717 copyjdorijars does not cleanup target directory https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-717 No progress. Will not hold up the release. 3. News on spec update? All updates have been made to Chapter 11. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Chapter 12. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Chapter 14. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Chapter 15. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Chapter 18. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Chapter 19. Committed accepted changes. All updates have been made to Appendix H. Committed accepted changes. Changes to the documents to modify the cross reference markers can now be done without affecting the semantics of the specification. Record Changes are not needed for these updates. 4. Other issues Action Items from weeks past: [Nov 02 2012] AI Craig JDO-678 needs a test case. Working on this item. [Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. [Aug 17 2012] AI Craig comment on JIRA JDO-589 Autocommit or nontransactional action [Jul 20 2012] AI Michelle: take a look into adding JDO social links to db.apache.org/jdo. [Sep 23 2011] AI Michael document when changing dependencies (to DataNucleus) it's necessary to rebuild the exectck project before running tck. Craig L Russell Architect, Oracle http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
