Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On 31/10/12 00:23, Jesse Glick wrote: On 10/30/2012 05:48 AM, Edward Cullen wrote: We've just hit this in our production environment: JENKINS-15369 - NPE from Jenkins.removeNode Do you have any idea how to reproduce? If so, do 300bfc4 87d9a6e help? CloudBees encountered this NPE in our hosted Jenkins instances, we are guessing due to a bug in a hudson.slaves.Cloud plugin. I did not propose the fix for backporting since the impact is not critical, the bug was not known to occur in other environments, and there is no verification of the fix. Hmm... It would seem that it was a completely transient error; it has stopped being a problem even WITHOUT a restart!?!? Not a happy place to be... I can provide config log info if you'd like, but I'm suspecting that you've got more important things to do... Eddy -- Edward Cullen Software Engineer n.able Technology Services mailto:edward.cul...@hp.com Assigned to HP StorageWorks VDU (D2D) --- Hewlett-Packard, Long Down Avenue, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, BS34 8QZ, United Kingdom. The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated, you should consider this message and attachments as 'HP CONFIDENTIAL'. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On 21/10/12 21:54, Vojtech Juranek wrote: Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: We've just hit this in our production environment: JENKINS-15369 - NPE from Jenkins.removeNode [1] Eddy [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15369 -- Edward Cullen Software Engineer n.able Technology Services mailto:edward.cul...@hp.com Assigned to HP StorageWorks VDU (D2D) --- Hewlett-Packard, Long Down Avenue, Stoke Gifford, Bristol, BS34 8QZ, United Kingdom. The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated, you should consider this message and attachments as 'HP CONFIDENTIAL'. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On 10/30/2012 05:48 AM, Edward Cullen wrote: We've just hit this in our production environment: JENKINS-15369 - NPE from Jenkins.removeNode Do you have any idea how to reproduce? If so, do 300bfc4 87d9a6e help? CloudBees encountered this NPE in our hosted Jenkins instances, we are guessing due to a bug in a hudson.slaves.Cloud plugin. I did not propose the fix for backporting since the impact is not critical, the bug was not known to occur in other environments, and there is no verification of the fix.
Re: Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
Grr, my bad. The new mainline release on Sunday flushed the queue and pushed everything to the site properly. 2012/10/27 Vojtech Juranek vjura...@redhat.com: On Wednesday 24 October 2012 21:01:24 Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: RC posted. unfortunately it's not propagated to the mirrors and cannot be downloaded. Could you (or someone with admin access - rtyler?) take a look and put it to the mirrors? Thanks Vojta -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Re: Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
@Kohsuke would you mind re-spin RC to include this fix? It passed all tests [1]. or, taken into account that backported fix/workaround is just wrapping one line into try-catch block, new RC is probably not needed at all. I'll start testing today with original RC
Re: Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On Wednesday 24 October 2012 21:01:24 Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: RC posted. unfortunately it's not propagated to the mirrors and cannot be downloaded. Could you (or someone with admin access - rtyler?) take a look and put it to the mirrors? Thanks Vojta
Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
RC posted. 2012/10/24 Vojtech Juranek vjura...@redhat.com: FYI: on JonJ there are some failed tests because of time out [1], on our instance it passed without any failure [2], so there shouldn't be any regressions caused by backporting [1] https://ci.jenkins-ci.org/view/Jenkins%20core/job/jenkins_lts_branch/75/ [2] http://ci.jboss.org/hudson/job/HTS-Jenkins-LTS/31/ On Tuesday 23 October 2012 12:10:02 Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: I'm flying back to home today, and planning to take a sweep Tuesday afternoon. 2012/10/22 Vojtech Juranek vjura...@redhat.com: Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: JENKINS-13336 Invalid JSON is produced during remote api operations [2] JENKINS-14667 java.io.InvalidClassException [3] JENKINS-15277 Check view permissions before showing config page [4] JENKINS-15493 Excessive memory usage with large number of request threads [5] Please let me know by Tuesday if there are any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1. As also agree on the meeting, RC should be available by Wednesday. Thanks Vojta [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2012/jenkins.2012-10-17-18.02.html [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13336 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14667 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15277 [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15493 -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On 10/21/2012 04:54 PM, Vojtech Juranek wrote: any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1 JENKINS-7214 [1] should be considered; large installations can be slowed to a crawl by this longstanding issue. Ditto JENKINS-15206 [2]. Neither are trivial fixes, though. JENKINS-15226 [3] is not exactly a severe bug but it makes reviewing logs (critical for debugging certain plugins) very difficult when running on JDK 7 and the fix is simple. JENKINS-15494 [4] is too new I guess, by a couple of days. [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-7214 [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15206 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15226 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15494
Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
JENKINS-15494 [4] is too new I guess, by a couple of days. [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-7214 [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15206 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15226 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15494 [1,2,3] backported, and yes, [4] is too new
Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
On 10/23/2012 03:33 PM, Vojtech Juranek wrote: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15206 You merged the main commit but not the follow-up 06514d2.
Re: Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
I guess this marker is that the issue is either blocker or critical (+ the fix has to be in Jenkins for at least cca 2 weeks). I'm asking because someone could forget to bump the issue to critical (default is major) or I can miss something (both happened in the past). On Monday 22 October 2012 07:55:18 nicolas de loof wrote: Makes me wonder : can we have some way on Jira to tag issues as *request backport to LTS*, so that LTS management would not require you to do such a reminder ? 2012/10/21 Vojtech Juranek vjura...@redhat.com Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: JENKINS-13336 Invalid JSON is produced during remote api operations [2] JENKINS-14667 java.io.InvalidClassException [3] JENKINS-15277 Check view permissions before showing config page [4] JENKINS-15493 Excessive memory usage with large number of request threads [5] Please let me know by Tuesday if there are any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1. As also agree on the meeting, RC should be available by Wednesday. Thanks Vojta [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2012/jenkins.2012-10-17-18.02.html [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13336 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14667 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15277 [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15493
RE: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
I would like to nominate JENKINS-15382 [1] Not a critical or blocker, but it caused me some intermittent grief. (and I've been running this in production backported to 1.466.2 thanks to Cloudbees) /James [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15382. -Original Message- From: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkinsci- d...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Vojtech Juranek Sent: 21 October 2012 21:55 To: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: Backports to LTS 1.480.1 Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: JENKINS-13336 Invalid JSON is produced during remote api operations [2] JENKINS-14667 java.io.InvalidClassException [3] JENKINS-15277 Check view permissions before showing config page [4] JENKINS-15493 Excessive memory usage with large number of request threads [5] Please let me know by Tuesday if there are any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1. As also agree on the meeting, RC should be available by Wednesday. Thanks Vojta [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2012/jenkins.2012-10-17-18.02.html [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13336 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14667 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15277 [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15493 ** This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmas...@nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00 **
Re: RE: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
Done On Monday 22 October 2012 09:19:45 Nord, James wrote: I would like to nominate JENKINS-15382 [1] Not a critical or blocker, but it caused me some intermittent grief. (and I've been running this in production backported to 1.466.2 thanks to Cloudbees) /James [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15382. -Original Message- From: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkinsci- d...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Vojtech Juranek Sent: 21 October 2012 21:55 To: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: Backports to LTS 1.480.1 Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: JENKINS-13336 Invalid JSON is produced during remote api operations [2] JENKINS-14667 java.io.InvalidClassException [3] JENKINS-15277 Check view permissions before showing config page [4] JENKINS-15493 Excessive memory usage with large number of request threads [5] Please let me know by Tuesday if there are any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1. As also agree on the meeting, RC should be available by Wednesday. Thanks Vojta [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2012/jenkins.2012-10-17-18.02.html [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13336 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14667 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15277 [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15493 ** This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmas...@nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00 *** ***
Re: Backports to LTS 1.480.1
I'm flying back to home today, and planning to take a sweep Tuesday afternoon. 2012/10/22 Vojtech Juranek vjura...@redhat.com: Hi, as agreed on the last Jenkins meeting [1], next LTS will be based on 1.480. I identified and backported following bug fixes: JENKINS-13336 Invalid JSON is produced during remote api operations [2] JENKINS-14667 java.io.InvalidClassException [3] JENKINS-15277 Check view permissions before showing config page [4] JENKINS-15493 Excessive memory usage with large number of request threads [5] Please let me know by Tuesday if there are any other critical or blocker issues need to be backported to 1.480.1. As also agree on the meeting, RC should be available by Wednesday. Thanks Vojta [1] http://meetings.jenkins-ci.org/jenkins/2012/jenkins.2012-10-17-18.02.html [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13336 [3] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14667 [4] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15277 [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-15493 -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
