[JIRA] (JENKINS-59665) Rework sorting for the Enabled and Uninstall columns of Installed in Plugin Manager

2019-10-12 Thread jsoref+jenk...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Josh Soref updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59665  
 
 
  Rework sorting for the Enabled and Uninstall columns of Installed in Plugin Manager   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Josh Soref  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 open /pluginManager/installed (Jenkins 2.198)Have: # a couple of plugins with dependencies (enabled) # a couple of plugins (disabled) # a couple of plugins that have never been upgraded # a couple of plugins which have been upgradedh3. Actual resultsI can't really explain what it's doing. – It appears to be stable (i.e. toggling the sort direction for one of these columns reverses the sort), but it isn't global (i.e. changing the sort key to a different column, e.g. Name, and then back to the Enabled column results in a new sort).h3. Expected resultsh5. Sorting by Enabled should sort into three sets: # Enabled (checkbox checked)   # Enabled (checkbox disabled) and can't be disabled (because they're used by enabled plugins)   # Disabled (checkbox unchecked)h5. Sorting by Uninstall should sort into :  two sets: # Uninstall button enabled # Uninstall button disabled  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-37895) Option to "skip" a locked section if a newer build already completed it

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This seems to need quite a lot of tracking and I currently consider this out of scope for the lockable-resources plugin. Feel free to reopen if you think otherwise.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-37895  
 
 
  Option to "skip" a locked section if a newer build already completed it   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-38002) Lockable Resources Plugin releases executor while waiting and executing

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Cannot Reproduce  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Sorry, but I cannot reproduce this behaviour at all. That shouldn't even be possible. If you encounter this bug again, please reopen and assign this issue to me and we can try to track down this issue.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-38002  
 
 
  Lockable Resources Plugin releases executor while waiting and executing   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Cannot Reproduce  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-58474) Port not reachable while creating a slave agent in windows for a linux master

2019-10-12 Thread reuben.tho...@me.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Reuben Thomas commented on  JENKINS-58474  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Port not reachable while creating a slave agent in windows for a linux master   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I'm seeing this too. The Windows 10 1903 agent is able to connect to a macOS server without problems, but fails to connect to a Fedora server.    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200609.1562940037000.6577.1570917240209%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck closed an issue as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Works as designed.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59758  
 
 
  hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck commented on  JENKINS-59758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Well, UpdateSite.Plugin is the plugin as it is being distributed by the update site. For the plugins you mention, published issues are already fixed in the releases currently being distributed as latest version. Therefore, no warnings apply to those releases. The reason this API based on UpdateSite.Plugin exists will be apparent when you filter the "available plugins" lists by the string /security/ – there are many plugins being distributed with active security warnings, i.e. even if you're on the newest release, you're affected by a known public security issue. These are typically abandoned plugins.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6571.1570913580394%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59759) localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin

2019-10-12 Thread ebu...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ebundy ebundy edited a comment on  JENKINS-59759  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 That is very probably right for online GitLab and it makes sense for an online tool , but by installing  GitLab (EE or the community/free version) on our own server, we could fortunately allow  to  the  use  of  localhost in hooks and services since in these conditions the CI and the SCM may be legitimately hosted on the same machine.Here is the option in the admin->network !gitlab-admin-outboud-request.png|thumbnail!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202482.1570880817000.6568.1570911180224%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59759) localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin

2019-10-12 Thread ebu...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ebundy ebundy commented on  JENKINS-59759  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 That is very probably right for online GitLab and it makes sense for an online tool , but by installing  GitLab (EE or the community/free version) on our own server, we could fortunately allow to use localhost in hooks and services since in these conditions the CI and the SCM may be legitimately hosted on the same machine. Here is the option in the admin->network    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202482.1570880817000.6566.1570911060143%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59759) localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin

2019-10-12 Thread ebu...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ebundy ebundy updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59759  
 
 
  localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 ebundy ebundy  
 
 
Attachment: 
 gitlab-admin-outboud-request.png  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202482.1570880817000.6564.1570910820240%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59759) localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin

2019-10-12 Thread parichay.barpa...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Parichay Barpanda commented on  JENKINS-59759  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Unfortunately, the GitLab doesn't support web hooks on localhost or a domain name not accessible in the internet (in lay man's term). If you are doing it for testing purpose you might want to disable the web hooks and system hooks (from the SCM traits) else host Jenkins docker in the cloud. I would like to know if you are using GitLab.com or using a self hosted GitLab server?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202482.1570880817000.6562.1570905900243%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread engst...@mtu.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Eric Engstrom edited a comment on  JENKINS-59758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Sorry - I thought the issue was more clear.Essentially if you attempt to get any issued warnings for an instance of {{hudson.model.UpdateSite$Plugin}}, you will ALWAYS get an empty list ({{[]}}).  I believe this to be the case because the version check on line  1250  1265  is checking against the *latest* version, not the installed version.My complex example code is only me trying to figure out why.  If you happen to have an instance of Jenkins around with a plugin with a security warning, try the first block of groovy code.      Is that helpful?  If not, I'll try again.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6560.1570904280127%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread engst...@mtu.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Eric Engstrom commented on  JENKINS-59758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Sorry - I thought the issue was more clear. Essentially if you attempt to get any issued warnings for an instance of hudson.model.UpdateSite$Plugin, you will ALWAYS get an empty list ([]). I believe this to be the case because the version check on line 1250 is checking against the latest version, not the installed version. My complex example code is only me trying to figure out why. If you happen to have an instance of Jenkins around with a plugin with a security warning, try the first block of groovy code.  Is that helpful? If not, I'll try again.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6557.1570904220267%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-56809) No lastCompletedBuild symlink

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-56809  
 
 
  No lastCompletedBuild symlink   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Labels: 
 lts-candidate symlink  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.198459.1553858983000.6556.1570904220254%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59514) Use @POST instead of @RequirePOST for form submission endpoints

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59514  
 
 
  Use @POST instead of @RequirePOST for form submission endpoints   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Labels: 
 lts-candidate robustness  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202137.156934393.6552.1570904160192%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58768) Mailer doesn't authenticate properly with Gmail

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated  JENKINS-58768  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-58768  
 
 
  Mailer doesn't authenticate properly with Gmail   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 mailer-1.26  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201073.1564671799000.6527.1570896420765%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59722) Old scm-api included in Jenkins LTS war file

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck closed an issue as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 It is unclear how you're running Jenkins, but it looks like it's unsupported. Jenkins will not usually extract bundled plugin versions in normal use (and if it does, it's to ensure implied dependencies are available; but in general, if you manually manage JENKINS_HOME/plugins, the expectation is that you provide correct versions of dependencies).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59722  
 
 
  Old scm-api included in Jenkins LTS war file   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59502) Jenkins supported for RHEL 7.6

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck closed an issue as Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This is an issue tracker, not a support site. Do not ask for help here. Try https://jenkins.io/chat/ or https://jenkins.io/mailing-lists/  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59502  
 
 
  Jenkins supported for RHEL 7.6   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Not A Defect  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59631) Adding different colors to history table and data filter

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59631  
 
 
  Adding different colors to history table and data filter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Labels: 
 newbie-friendly  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202313.1570043107000.6516.1570896060520%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59631) Adding different colors to history table and data filter

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59631  
 
 
  Adding different colors to history table and data filter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When I start or refresh a job page, the build history alternating colors start with white on the filter textbox, then grey/white/grey/white for the builds. Also, after using the filter box, or even clearing an already empty filter, the colors clashe with the filter textbox having grey, and them white/grey/white/grey for the builds. It seems that color alteration are not in the right orderIt is an inconsequential issue as the rest of page and features work very well. I think there are some minor issues with html element rendering.   Thx,Matt [https://coding-bootcamps.com/] [https://myhsts.org/] [https://dcwebmakers.com/]   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59631) Adding different colors to history table and data filter

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck commented on  JENKINS-59631  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Adding different colors to history table and data filter   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Can confirm. Interesting find   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202313.1570043107000.6511.1570896060334%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59333) customWorkspace relative definition isn't straight

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59333  
 
 
  customWorkspace relative definition isn't straight   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Component/s: 
 pipeline  
 
 
Component/s: 
 core  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201884.1568299963000.6509.1570895880153%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59332) customWorkspace did not stay with specified path

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59332  
 
 
  customWorkspace did not stay with specified path   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Component/s: 
 pipeline  
 
 
Component/s: 
 core  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201883.1568298953000.6507.1570895760139%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59199) E-mail Notification - Stack trace

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated  JENKINS-59199  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59199  
 
 
  E-mail Notification - Stack trace   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201642.1567493023000.6505.1570895700277%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59199) E-mail Notification - Stack trace

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59199  
 
 
  E-mail Notification - Stack trace   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Priority: 
 Blocker Minor  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201642.1567493023000.6503.1570895460162%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59396) AWT initialized even with -Djava.awt.headless=true

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck commented on  JENKINS-59396  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: AWT initialized even with -Djava.awt.headless=true   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Are you sure you're setting the system property correctly? How can you tell?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201953.1568647597000.6500.1570895400146%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59665) Rework sorting for the Enabled and Uninstall columns of Installed in Plugin Manager

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59665  
 
 
  Rework sorting for the Enabled and Uninstall columns of Installed in Plugin Manager   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Labels: 
 newbie-friendly  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202357.1570213644000.6498.1570895220136%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59684) Admin monitor "info" are not styled in popup mode

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated  JENKINS-59684  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Will be in the upcoming weekly 2.200.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59684  
 
 
  Admin monitor "info" are not styled in popup mode   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 jenkins-2.200  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59681) Version selection for Jenkins Automatic Upgrade feature

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck commented on  JENKINS-59681  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Version selection for Jenkins Automatic Upgrade feature   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Would not hold my breath here as this requires a significant project infra extension for very little benefit (just hold off updating for a week, or go the manual way). Speaking as a co-maintainer of core and the update center, you can probably consider this "Won't Fix" unless you're interested in doing this yourself, or able to get someone else to take an interest here.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202379.1570438654000.6493.1570895160316%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck edited a comment on  JENKINS-59758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 [~eengstrom]Hi  Erik  Eric , I'm the original author of this feature. There's a bunch of technical details in this report of you digging into the internals, but I do not understand what exactly the behavior is that you're seeing, and what you expect to see instead, and why. Could you provide these?Thanks!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6488.1570894980264%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59758  
 
 
  hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Component/s: 
 update-sites-manager-plugin  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6490.1570894980300%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59758) hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck commented on  JENKINS-59758  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: hudson.model.UpdateSite.Plugin:getWarnings() using incorrect plugin version, resulting in no warnings found   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Eric Engstrom Hi Erik, I'm the original author of this feature. There's a bunch of technical details in this report of you digging into the internals, but I do not understand what exactly the behavior is that you're seeing, and what you expect to see instead, and why. Could you provide these? Thanks!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202481.1570833476000.6485.1570894920215%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42720) ConcurrentModificationException when serializing LockableResourcesManager

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher commented on  JENKINS-42720  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: ConcurrentModificationException when serializing LockableResourcesManager   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I suspect this was about the same issue as JENKINS-44597, which was fixed in release 2.1 - If you see similar issues, please open a new issue with new evidence.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.179679.1489419394000.6478.1570893660674%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42720) ConcurrentModificationException when serializing LockableResourcesManager

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42720  
 
 
  ConcurrentModificationException when serializing LockableResourcesManager   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 lockable-resources 2.1  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.179679.1489419394000.6480.1570893660740%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-44597) ConcurrentModificationException on releasing lock

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher commented on  JENKINS-44597  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: ConcurrentModificationException on releasing lock   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This seems to have been addressed in release 2.1, please reopen with new evidence if it is still an issue.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.182452.149630054.6468.1570893480925%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-44597) ConcurrentModificationException on releasing lock

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-44597  
 
 
  ConcurrentModificationException on releasing lock   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 lockable-resources 2.1  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.182452.149630054.6470.1570893481316%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59760) "Fields" parameter does not work with jiraJqlSearch

2019-10-12 Thread szhemzhit...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sergey Zhemzhitsky created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59760  
 
 
  "Fields" parameter does not work with jiraJqlSearch   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Naresh Rayapati  
 
 
Components: 
 jira-steps-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2019-10-12 15:01  
 
 
Environment: 
 JIRA Cloud  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Sergey Zhemzhitsky  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It seems that "fields" parameter does not work with jiraJqlSearch or at least it's unclear how it should be used properly. Here is the query to get 3 issues with key and summary fields only 

 

def issues = jiraJqlSearch(
jql: "project='AM'",
fields: 'key,summary',
site: 'jira',
maxResults: 3
)
 

 and this snippet returns the following error 

 

[Pipeline] jiraJqlSearch
JIRA: Site - jira - Search JQL: project='AM' startAt: 0 maxResults: 3
Error Code: 400
Error Message: {"errorMessages":["Can not deserialize instance of java.util.ArrayList out of VALUE_STRING token\n at [Source: org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteInputStream@2e4bdc21; line: 1, column: 51] (through reference chain: com.atlassian.jira.rest.v2.search.SearchRequestBean[\"fields\"])"]}
 

 Trying to pass fields as array like the following 


[JIRA] (JENKINS-43002) Unable to lock by label in a declarative pipeline script

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-43002  
 
 
  Unable to lock by label in a declarative pipeline script   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Priority: 
 Blocker Minor  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.180016.1490132375000.6448.157089946%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-44515) Implement lock_any option for pipelines

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This should be possible with the API implemented in JENKINS-40997, closing. If I'm missing something, please reopen, assign to me and describe what is missing for a proper solution (As always, pull requests welcome).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-44515  
 
 
  Implement lock_any option for pipelines   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 lockable-resources 1.11  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-44950) Support a quantity of zero required resources

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-44950  
 
 
  Support a quantity of zero required resources   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/releases/tag/lockable-resources-2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.183025.1497643509000.6440.157000179%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-44950) Support a quantity of zero required resources

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher commented on  JENKINS-44950  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Support a quantity of zero required resources   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Does this fix in release 2.6 from today help? This allows an "empty" lock when using the "extra" list: 

 

def locks = []
if (cond) {
locks << [quantity: 1, resource: 'foo']
}
lock(extra: locks) {
// some block
}
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.183025.1497643509000.6436.1570888740184%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-48375) Jenkins RSS feeds are actually Atom feeds

2019-10-12 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Beck closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Fix will be released this weekend in 2.200  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-48375  
 
 
  Jenkins RSS feeds are actually Atom feeds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Daniel Beck  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 jenkins-2.200  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-45131) Locking Resources is slow

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher assigned an issue to Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-45131  
 
 
  Locking Resources is slow   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.183231.1498473858000.6405.1570886160426%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-45131) Locking Resources is slow

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher commented on  JENKINS-45131  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Locking Resources is slow   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Is this still an issue, even with JENKINS-45821 fixed? If yes, can you provide a stack dump when the system is in such a state (maybe by private mail to me)?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.183231.1498473858000.6403.1570886160395%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-38906) Remove lock resource name from global configuration when lock is released

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This should be fixed with the ephemeral lock support in release 2.6 - Everthing that is created automatically is now removed automatically.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-38906  
 
 
  Remove lock resource name from global configuration when lock is released   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Antonio Muñiz Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/releases/tag/lockable-resources-2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59413) Links to plugin docs should consistently point to plugins site

2019-10-12 Thread zbynek1...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Zbynek Konecny assigned an issue to Unassigned  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59413  
 
 
  Links to plugin docs should consistently point to plugins site   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Zbynek Konecny  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Zbynek Konecny  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201975.1568760472000.6342.1570885140052%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59413) Links to plugin docs should consistently point to plugins site

2019-10-12 Thread zbynek1...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Zbynek Konecny closed an issue as Duplicate  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59413  
 
 
  Links to plugin docs should consistently point to plugins site   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Zbynek Konecny  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Duplicate  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201975.1568760472000.6341.1570885080109%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-46235) API does not allow to remove lockable resource

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher commented on  JENKINS-46235  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: API does not allow to remove lockable resource   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As I try to understand the usecase here (and the blatant violation of script security  ): Is the introduction of "ephemeral" resources covering your use cases or do you need something more complex? If you need something more complex, maybe a new set of pipeline steps with proper permission checks is the better way? The LockableResourcesManager API was never designed for use in pipeline... (As always, pull requests welcome, but I suspect such a feature could even be its own plugin "extending" the lockable-resources plugin)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.184480.1502885271000.6333.1570884840267%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-48026) can not reserve lockable resources with quot in name via UI

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This might haven been "accidentally" fixed by the fix for SECURITY-1361...  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-48026  
 
 
  can not reserve lockable resources with quot in name via UI   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 lockable-resources 2.5?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59759) localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin

2019-10-12 Thread ebu...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ebundy ebundy created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59759  
 
 
  localhost not allowed for jeknins with gitlab-branch-source-plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Parichay Barpanda  
 
 
Components: 
 gitlab-branch-source-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2019-10-12 11:46  
 
 
Environment: 
 Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS / Jenkins Blue Ocean on docker with the network of the host  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 ebundy ebundy  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hello, Not sure whether that is a bug. Feel free to requalify it if needed.  My current scenario :  
 
running the Jenkins application  in a docker container, and running the container with the network of the docker host (–network=host as arg). 
configuring a multibranch pipeline project with Gitlab as branch source. 
clicking save 
 We get on the UI (and in the log) that exception :     

 

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Jenkins URL cannot start with http://localhost URL is: http://localhost:8081/ at io.jenkins.plugins.gitlabbranchsource.GitLabHookCreator.checkURL(GitLabHookCreator.java:167) at io.jenkins.plugins.gitlabbranchsource.GitLabHookCreator.getHookUrl(GitLabHookCreator.java:154) at io.jenkins.plugins.gitlabbranchsource.GitLabHookCreator.register(GitLabHookCreator.java:85) at io.jenkins.plugins.gitlabbranchsource.GitLabSCMSource.afterSave(GitLabSCMSource.java:752) at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-50618) Provide information in the console about who owns a lock when waiting

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 This is now fixed (for better or worse) in 2.6 - I didn't think about the information disclosure issue, will discuss with contributors...  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-50618  
 
 
  Provide information in the console about who owns a lock when waiting   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/releases/tag/lockable-resources-2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 


[JIRA] (JENKINS-55486) If lock() creates a new resource, there should be a choice to make it temporary

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher updated  JENKINS-55486  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Released with 2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-55486  
 
 
  If lock() creates a new resource, there should be a choice to make it temporary   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Fixed but Unreleased Resolved  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/releases/tag/lockable-resources-2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-55182) CasC compatibility with Lockable Resource plugin

2019-10-12 Thread tobias-jenk...@23.gs (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tobias Gruetzmacher resolved as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-55182  
 
 
  CasC compatibility with Lockable Resource plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Tobias Gruetzmacher  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/lockable-resources-plugin/releases/tag/lockable-resources-2.6  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59651) PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.

2019-10-12 Thread sea...@aliyun.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sean Ly updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59651  
 
 
  PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Sean Ly  
 
 
Attachment: 
 image-2019-10-12-16-32-14-716.png  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202341.1570157505000.6304.1570869420198%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59651) PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.

2019-10-12 Thread sea...@aliyun.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sean Ly edited a comment on  JENKINS-59651  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 version 1.4 has this problem, rolling back to 1.3 does not  git diff: !image-2019-10-12-16-32-14-716.png!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202341.1570157505000.6301.1570869360287%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59651) PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.

2019-10-12 Thread sea...@aliyun.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sean Ly edited a comment on  JENKINS-59651  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 version 1.4 has this problem, rolling back to 1.3 does not  git diff: !image-2019-10-12-16-32-14-716.png!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202341.1570157505000.6298.1570869180192%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59651) PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.

2019-10-12 Thread sea...@aliyun.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Sean Ly commented on  JENKINS-59651  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: PIPELINE_VERSION can not export to shell environment.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 version 1.4 has this problem, rolling back to 1.3 does not  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202341.1570157505000.6295.1570869060228%40Atlassian.JIRA.