[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread fede.e...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Federico Pellegrin edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 What you are trying to do is to tell your tool (OpenCover ?) to filter them and that totally depends on your tool. I sincerely don't know much about OpenCover and never used it, but looking at the [usage page|https://github.com/opencover/opencover/wiki/Usage] I don't see an {code:java}  --exclude {code}  option as by your example but see some   { { code:java} - - excludebyfile . {code } } . Maybe that is what you are looking for! On the other side, on Jenkins coverage plugin side, such a filtering feature right now is not present. You may in case try to request it at the plugin page, but given that usually the tools generating the reports can do this it is maybe not something very interesting for the plugin itself.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6732.1578718080200%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread fede.e...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Federico Pellegrin commented on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 What you are trying to do is to tell your tool (OpenCover ?) to filter them and that totally depends on your tool. I sincerely don't know much about OpenCover and never used it, but looking at the usage page I don't see an --exclude option as by your example but see some {{-excludebyfile.}}Maybe that is what you are looking for!   On the other side, on Jenkins coverage plugin side, such a filtering feature right now is not present. You may in case try to request it at the plugin page, but given that usually the tools generating the reports can do this it is maybe not something very interesting for the plugin itself.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6728.1578718020265%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi FYI   [~fedepell],  [~stephenconnolly]    Hi  mate  [~fedepell]  hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :(.{color}{color:#172b4d}   Existing Code:{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  example: Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this m

[JIRA] (JENKINS-6957) Windows slave fails to find java

2020-01-10 Thread ilaty...@yahoo.ca (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ilguiz Latypov edited a comment on  JENKINS-6957  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Windows slave fails to find java   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The "system cannot find the file specified" error results from the poor service wrapper architecture that freezes the java.exe location in the "executable" XML tag inside its jenkins-slave.xml.[https://mohitgoyal.co/2016/12/18/failed-to-start-jenkins-after-updating-java/] I also found that it helps to comment out the other tag enabling a live update of the slave JAR.  When this update is enabled, the service fails to start  silently trying .  The wrapper log shows an attempt  to download the file and timing out without giving a verbose reason for this.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.137054.1278976025000.6714.1578706920285%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-6957) Windows slave fails to find java

2020-01-10 Thread ilaty...@yahoo.ca (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ilguiz Latypov edited a comment on  JENKINS-6957  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Windows slave fails to find java   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The "system cannot find the file specified"  error  results from the poor service wrapper architecture that freezes the java.exe location in the "executable" XML tag inside its jenkins-slave.xml. [ https://mohitgoyal.co/2016/12/18/failed-to-start-jenkins-after-updating-java/ ] I also found that it helps to comment out the other tag enabling a live update of the slave JAR.  When this update is enabled, the service fails to start silently trying to download the file and timing out without giving a verbose reason for this.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.137054.1278976025000.6705.1578706860276%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-6957) Windows slave fails to find java

2020-01-10 Thread ilaty...@yahoo.ca (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ilguiz Latypov commented on  JENKINS-6957  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Windows slave fails to find java   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The "system cannot find the file specified" results from the poor service wrapper architecture that freezes the java.exe location in the "executable" XML tag inside its jenkins-slave.xml. https://mohitgoyal.co/2016/12/18/failed-to-start-jenkins-after-updating-java/  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.137054.1278976025000.6696.1578706740326%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60353) Non-mergable Pull-request Contents Get into GH Cache with False-Positive 404

2020-01-10 Thread kshu...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karl Shultz commented on  JENKINS-60353  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Non-mergable Pull-request Contents Get into GH Cache with False-Positive 404   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 For the record, converting the plugin to use okhttp3 did not solve this problem.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203370.1575386738000.6694.1578705480182%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} {color:#172b4d}  This example is not worked. :(.{color} {color:#172b4d}   Existing Code:{color} {color} {code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}   example: Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message becau

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} {color:#172b4d}  This example is not worked. :(. {color}       {color:#172b4d}     Existing Code:{color}{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :( .     {color:#172b4d}Existing Code:{color}{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:   {code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :(       {color:#172b4d}   Normal Existing  Code:{color}{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}    Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll: {code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are s

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :(  {color:#172b4d}   Normal Code:{color}{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}   {color:#172b4d}   Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll: {color}    {code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :({color:#172b4d}Normal Code:{color}  {color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code} {color:#ff}    {color}    {color:#172b4d}Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this mes

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :(  {color :#172b4d } Normal Code:{color} { color}{ code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll -- result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}{color:#ff} {color}{color:#172b4d}Code I want for Exclude dapper.dll:{color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll -- exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:#ff} This example is not worked. :({color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6662.1578704041743%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls (eg: dapper.dll) from including to this code-coverage reports; Such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage reports. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here?  Such as when I running my RunTests.ps1 script for unit testing can I add some code to exclude dapper.dll file in below code ? {color:# FF ff } This example is not worked. :({color}  {code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6658.1578703980369%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake edited a comment on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi [~fedepell], Hi mate hope you doing good?I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls  (eg: dapper.dll)  from including to this code-coverage reports , such ; Such  as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage  reports . So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files?Is their any code to exclude dll files in here . ?   Such  as when  I  changed  running  my  code for as below  RunTests .  But it doesn't work ps1 script  for  me  unit testing can I add some code  to exclude  the packages  dapper . dll file in below code ? {color:#FF} This example is not worked. :({color}{code:java}.$Opencover\OpenCover.Console.exe -target:"$NUNIT\nunit3-console.exe" -targetargs:".\Tests\NunitFast\NUnitTestsFast\$CONFIGURATION\net47\ServiceTestFast.dll --exclude dapper.dll --result=.\Tests\NunitFast\upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -output:".\Tests\NunitFast\opencover-upstream-corewebservice-nunit-result.xml" -register:"user"  {code}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6656.1578703980331%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59308) Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar

2020-01-10 Thread amila.k...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Amila Gunathilake commented on  JENKINS-59308  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cobertura Code coverage all reports are showing in similar
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 hi Federico Pellegrin, Hi mate hope you doing good? I just want one thing to make sure. I wanted to exclude some dlls from including to this code-coverage reports, such as in my source code their are dlls I don't want to use for use as packages for Code-Coverage. So when generating my unit tests Code-Coverage reports how can I exclude those dll files? Is their any code to exclude dll files in here.  Such I changed my code for as below. But it doesn't work for me to exclude the packages.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201856.1568169015000.6650.1578703320248%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60712) Copied managed config file should be removed when block ends

2020-01-10 Thread nfalc...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Nikolas Falco commented on  JENKINS-60712  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Copied managed config file should be removed when block ends   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It was so, this is a regression after update the config file provider plugin  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203960.157858259.6648.1578702660173%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60736) Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin

2020-01-10 Thread habd...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki edited a comment on  JENKINS-60736  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 OK. I  understand  see  your opinion, but I do not understand it.We saw all tokens in logs on the server, so I am not sure, why it cannot be visible in form of environment variable.SVN plugin exposes SVN credentials in this ways as well - there is variable, which contains them.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203989.1578680312000.6646.1578698100114%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60736) Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin

2020-01-10 Thread habd...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki commented on  JENKINS-60736  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 OK. I understand your opinion, but I do not understand it. We saw all tokens in logs on the server, so I am not sure, why it cannot be visible in form of environment variable. SVN plugin exposes SVN credentials in this ways as well - there is variable, which contains them.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203989.1578680312000.6644.1578698040127%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60737) EC2 ASG Slave taken offline in middle of a job for no diskspace left when multiple executors given to a slave

2020-01-10 Thread arindom.sar...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Arindom Sarkar created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60737  
 
 
  EC2 ASG Slave taken offline in middle of a job for no diskspace left when multiple executors given to a slave   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Chad Schmutzer  
 
 
Components: 
 ec2-fleet-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 22:38  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Arindom Sarkar  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 slaves spawned off by EC2 fleet plugin were taken offline with this message. This happens when multiple executors assigned to the slave, and jobs are allotted to them concurrently and every jobs checkout a git repository. Is there a way to avoid this? 13:31:12 nonprodslave2 i-0dd32 was marked offline: Node is being removed Receiving objects: 79% (88346/111053), 179.52 MiB | 2.03 MiB/s fatal: write error: No space left on device*13:30:29* fatal: index-pack failed*13:30:29*  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60736) Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin

2020-01-10 Thread kuisathave...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ivan Fernandez Calvo closed an issue as Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60736  
 
 
  Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Ivan Fernandez Calvo  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203989.1578680312000.6640.1578694320431%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60736) Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin

2020-01-10 Thread kuisathave...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ivan Fernandez Calvo commented on  JENKINS-60736  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 SAML plugin does not manage anything on builds, it only makes the authentication and authorization part, that's it. The token provided by the IdP is in the browser of the user, expose it directly as an environment variable is a security issue. So the only implementation for your use case is a plugin that grabs the token from the browser and creates a credential in the user namespace with the value, then you can select this credential as a parameter for your jobs, thus this something that does not fit on the SAML plugin.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203989.1578680312000.6638.1578694320389%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-23601) Modify Audit Trail plugin to log information based on user type

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz closed an issue as Incomplete  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-23601  
 
 
  Modify Audit Trail plugin to log information based on user type   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Incomplete  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.155983.1403863263000.6635.1578688860357%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-23601) Modify Audit Trail plugin to log information based on user type

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz commented on  JENKINS-23601  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Modify Audit Trail plugin to log information based on user type   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Closing for now please reopen if you still need the feature and have more details.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.155983.1403863263000.6633.1578688860327%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49499) Jenkins admin logs through Logger List not getting captured

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz commented on  JENKINS-49499  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Jenkins admin logs through Logger List not getting captured   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Closing for now, please reopen if you still lack the events.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.188390.1518428802000.6629.1578688680260%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49499) Jenkins admin logs through Logger List not getting captured

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz closed an issue as Incomplete  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-49499  
 
 
  Jenkins admin logs through Logger List not getting captured   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Incomplete  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.188390.1518428802000.6631.1578688680288%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-40517) Allow changing delimiter in log output

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz updated  JENKINS-40517  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-40517  
 
 
  Allow changing delimiter in log output   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Fixed but Unreleased  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.177193.1481911536000.6619.1578688500727%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-12848) Log parameters used for a build

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz started work on  JENKINS-12848  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.143306.1329845988000.6622.1578688500776%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-12848) Log parameters used for a build

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz assigned an issue to Pierre Beitz  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-12848  
 
 
  Log parameters used for a build   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Alan Harder Pierre Beitz  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.143306.1329845988000.6625.1578688500827%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-12848) Log parameters used for a build

2020-01-10 Thread pibe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Pierre Beitz updated  JENKINS-12848  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-12848  
 
 
  Log parameters used for a build   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Pierre Beitz  
 
 
Status: 
 In  Progress  Review  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.143306.1329845988000.6627.1578688500848%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60621) unable to add sonar project key in the jenkins.

2020-01-10 Thread msven....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Michael Svendsen commented on  JENKINS-60621  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: unable to add sonar project key in the jenkins.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We just ran into this error today and discovered that the issue was a trailing `/` in our sonarqube instance url configuration. So under "Manage Jenkins" -> "Configure System" make sure you don't have a trailing `/` on your instance url under the "Quality Gates - Sonarqube" section.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203852.1577958715000.6617.1578687480169%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60723) Github PR from jenkins

2020-01-10 Thread bksavi...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Brian Saville commented on  JENKINS-60723  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Github PR from jenkins   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 reddi sekhara, I own the GitHub Pull Request Comment Build Plugin, which is very different from the GHPRB plugin you are trying to configure. I've reassigned components, good luck.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203972.1578646189000.6614.1578686460192%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60723) Github PR from jenkins

2020-01-10 Thread bksavi...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Brian Saville updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60723  
 
 
  Github PR from jenkins   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Brian Saville  
 
 
Component/s: 
 ghprb-plugin  
 
 
Component/s: 
 github-pr-comment-build-plugin  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203972.1578646189000.6610.1578686400306%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60723) Github PR from jenkins

2020-01-10 Thread bksavi...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Brian Saville assigned an issue to Unassigned  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60723  
 
 
  Github PR from jenkins   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Brian Saville  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Brian Saville  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203972.1578646189000.6612.1578686400358%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-54748) Memory leak in test-results-analyzer causes Jenkins to crash

2020-01-10 Thread adammgr...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Adam Grant commented on  JENKINS-54748  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Memory leak in test-results-analyzer causes Jenkins to crash   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This is an urgent issue for my Jenkins service. Any updates? Can we make a bounty?    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195552.1542794187000.6603.1578685200266%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60725) "Added a missed class for missing class telemetry" on AdoptOpenJDK 11

2020-01-10 Thread etho...@inbox.lv (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ethorsa updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60725  
 
 
  "Added a missed class for missing class telemetry" on AdoptOpenJDK 11   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 ethorsa  
 
 
Issue Type: 
 New Feature Bug  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203974.1578649121000.6600.1578681360399%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60736) Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin

2020-01-10 Thread habd...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60736  
 
 
  Add posibility to obtain SAML assertion after login using SAML plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Ivan Fernandez Calvo  
 
 
Components: 
 saml-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 18:18  
 
 
Environment: 
 Linux RedHat, SAML Plugin 1.1.4, Jenkins 2.204.1.  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Dears,   After login to Jenkins using SAML plugin user may perform some actions like preparing automatic deployment after build or calling some other tools over the REST APIs, but those actions (tools) require authentication (e.g. in form of valid SAML assertion). The feature would be to give build tasks access to SAML assertion e.g. via temporary created environment variable, how it is done for build name or build ID and bunch of others. How it would be possible to implement? Perhaps we can provide some implementation proposal, but we shall agree on feature design.   Best regards, Seweryn.    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42811) Vsphere Cloud plugin stops working after a number of builds

2020-01-10 Thread pjdar...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 pjdarton commented on  JENKINS-42811  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Vsphere Cloud plugin stops working after a number of builds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 According to that log message, you've set a max=10 for instances from that template. So, unless you've got other templates defined on that cloud, you're never going to reach 50 as that template is capped at 10 - that's why it's saying it's 100% full when it's got 10 instances provisioned with max=10. You either need to allow that template to spawn an unlimited number of instances (capped only by the cloud instance cap), or to spawn a larger number of instances, or to define other templates such that the sum of all templates' max fields comes to at least the cloud's instance cap.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.179810.1489595244000.6594.1578678060182%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60685) Kubernetes plugin crashes from v1.22.4

2020-01-10 Thread oliv...@omary.fr (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 MARY Olivier commented on  JENKINS-60685  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Kubernetes plugin crashes from v1.22.4   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Fixed for me since 1.22.5 on kubernetes 1.15.6 will try in 1.16.3  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203929.1578472634000.6592.1578677580228%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60735) No more trim on kubernetes labels

2020-01-10 Thread oliv...@omary.fr (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 MARY Olivier updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60735  
 
 
  No more trim on kubernetes labels   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 MARY Olivier  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 HimI switched 1.21.3 to 1.22.5  Kubernetes Plugin versionSince switch I had this error :  {code:java}Failed to count the # of live instances on Kubernetesio.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException: Failure executing: GET at: https://kubernetes.default/api/v1/namespaces/prod-jenkins/pods?labelSelector=jenkins%3Dslave%2Cjenkins%2Flabel%3Dlinux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_. Message: unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '-', '_' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'MyValue', or 'my_value', or '12345', regex used for validation is '(([A-Za-z0-9][-A-Za-z0-9_.]*)?[A-Za-z0-9])?'). Received status: Status(apiVersion=v1, code=400, details=null, kind=Status, message=unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '-', '_' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'MyValue', or 'my_value', or '12345', regex used for validation is '(([A-Za-z0-9][-A-Za-z0-9_.]*)?[A-Za-z0-9])?'), metadata=ListMeta(_continue=null, remainingItemCount=null, resourceVersion=null, selfLink=null, additionalProperties={}), reason=BadRequest, status=Failure, additionalProperties={}). at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.requestFailure(OperationSupport.java:510) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.assertResponseCode(OperationSupport.java:449) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java:413) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java:372) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java:354) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.listRequestHelper(BaseOperation.java:153) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.list(BaseOperation.java:620) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.list(BaseOperation.java:69) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.getActiveSlavePods(KubernetesCloud.java:608) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.addProvisionedSlave(KubernetesCloud.java:593) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.provision(KubernetesCloud.java:535) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner$StandardStrategyImpl.apply(NodeProvisioner.java:725) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.update(NodeProvisioner.java:332) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.access$900(NodeProvisioner.java:63) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner$NodeProvisionerInvoker.doRun(NodeProvisioner.java:819) at hudson.triggers.SafeTimerTask.run(SafeTimerTask.java:70) at jenkins.security.ImpersonatingScheduledExecutorService$1.ru

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60735) No more trim on kubernetes labels

2020-01-10 Thread oliv...@omary.fr (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 MARY Olivier updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60735  
 
 
  No more trim on kubernetes labels   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 MARY Olivier  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 HimI switched 1.21.3 to 1.22.5  Kubernetes Plugin versionSince switch I had this error : {quote}Failed to count the # of live instances on Kubernetes  io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException: Failure executing: GET at: https://kubernetes.default/api/v1/namespaces/prod-jenkins/pods?labelSelector=jenkins%3Dslave%2Cjenkins%2Flabel%3Dlinux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_. Message: unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '-', '_' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'MyValue', or 'my_value', or '12345', regex used for validation is '(([A-Za-z0-9][-A-Za-z0-9_.]*)?[A-Za-z0-9])?'). Received status: Status(apiVersion=v1, code=400, details=null, kind=Status, message=unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '-', '_' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'MyValue', or 'my_value', or '12345', regex used for validation is '(([A-Za-z0-9][-A-Za-z0-9_.]*)?[A-Za-z0-9])?'), metadata=ListMeta(_continue=null, remainingItemCount=null, resourceVersion=null, selfLink=null, additionalProperties={}), reason=BadRequest, status=Failure, additionalProperties={}).     at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.requestFailure(OperationSupport.java:510)   at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.assertResponseCode(OperationSupport.java:449)     at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java {code : 413) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport. java :372) }   at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.OperationSupport.handleResponse(OperationSupport.java:354) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.listRequestHelper(BaseOperation.java:153) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.list(BaseOperation.java:620) at io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.dsl.base.BaseOperation.list(BaseOperation.java:69) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.getActiveSlavePods(KubernetesCloud.java:608) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.addProvisionedSlave(KubernetesCloud.java:593) at org.csanchez.jenkins.plugins.kubernetes.KubernetesCloud.provision(KubernetesCloud.java:535) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner$StandardStrategyImpl.apply(NodeProvisioner.java:725) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.update(NodeProvisioner.java:332) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner.access$900(NodeProvisioner.java:63) at hudson.slaves.NodeProvisioner$NodeProvisionerInvoker.doRun(NodeProvisioner.java:819) at hudson.triggers.SafeTimerTask.run(SafeTimerTask.java:70) at jenkins.security.ImpersonatingSchedule

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60735) No more trim on kubernetes labels

2020-01-10 Thread oliv...@omary.fr (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 MARY Olivier created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60735  
 
 
  No more trim on kubernetes labels   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 17:27  
 
 
Environment: 
 Kubernetes 1.15.6  Kubernetes-plugin 1.22.5  Jenkins LTS 1.204.1  
 
 
Labels: 
 plugin jenkins kubernetes kubernetes-plugin  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 MARY Olivier  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Him I switched 1.21.3 to 1.22.5  Kubernetes Plugin version Since switch I had this error : 

Failed to count the # of live instances on Kubernetes io.fabric8.kubernetes.client.KubernetesClientException: Failure executing: GET at: https://kubernetes.default/api/v1/namespaces/prod-jenkins/pods?labelSelector=jenkins%3Dslave%2Cjenkins%2Flabel%3Dlinux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_. Message: unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g_": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '', '' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'MyValue', or 'my_value', or '12345', regex used for validation is '(([A-Za-z0-9][-A-Za-z0-9_.])?[A-Za-z0-9])?'). Received status: Status(apiVersion=v1, code=400, details=null, kind=Status, message=unable to parse requirement: invalid label value: "linux_alpine_openjdk_jdk8_4g": at key: "jenkins/label": a valid label must be an empty string or consist of alphanumeric characters, '', '_' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. '

[JIRA] (JENKINS-54502) Jenkins crashed when a running build was aborted.

2020-01-10 Thread vipulmad...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Vipul Madaan commented on  JENKINS-54502  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Jenkins crashed when a running build was aborted.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hello My issue got resolved . I downloaded the Executable of Jenkins and instead of running an upgrade from UI Or replacing a jar file Idid use newly downloaded executable to do a fresh install of newer version on top of my previous version . So now I have newer version and don’t have any crashes . I have tested it for a while and I am not able to reproduce the crash .  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195272.1541539669000.6572.1578677160456%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-54502) Jenkins crashed when a running build was aborted.

2020-01-10 Thread ingolf...@sjova.is (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 ingolfur Thorisson commented on  JENKINS-54502  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Jenkins crashed when a running build was aborted.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Is this still an issue? I'm also seeing this behaviour on 2.204.1  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195272.1541539669000.6557.1578676440328%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60216) Pipeline Build Step should automatically convert mistyped parameters to the correct type where possible

2020-01-10 Thread dnusb...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Devin Nusbaum commented on  JENKINS-60216  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline Build Step should automatically convert mistyped parameters to the correct type where possible   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Bogomil Vasilev If your builds were working before the change, then you should be able to just change the type of the parameter on the downstream job to a string parameter so that no conversion happens, since that is what the previous behavior would have been (there was no conversion previously, so you were just passing a string parameter, which the downstream job apparently handles correctly, so I don't think the triggered builds were actually using the Node and Label Parameter Plugin, you just thought they were (this doesn't apply if you were also building the downstream job via the UI, since I think node and label parameters would work in that context)). If you want to keep use the Node and Label Parameter Plugin, then I would start watching and vote on JENKINS-43720 and JENKINS-47571. Max Matissek I think the Extensible Choice Parameter Plugin is a special case, and we should still convert the parameters for them but not log a warning, similarly to what is done now for regular Choice Parameters. Can you please file a new bug for that issue?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203189.1574194043000.6555.1578

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59259) sshAgent step does not survive agent disconnect/reconnect

2020-01-10 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick updated  JENKINS-59259  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59259  
 
 
  sshAgent step does not survive agent disconnect/reconnect   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jesse Glick  
 
 
Status: 
 Fixed but Unreleased Resolved  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201727.1567754679000.6552.1578675180180%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59259) sshAgent step does not survive agent disconnect/reconnect

2020-01-10 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick updated  JENKINS-59259  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59259  
 
 
  sshAgent step does not survive agent disconnect/reconnect   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Jesse Glick  
 
 
Status: 
 In Review Fixed but Unreleased  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Released As: 
 1.18  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201727.1567754679000.6550.1578674820617%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60407) Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)

2020-01-10 Thread d...@fortysix.ch (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dominik Bartholdi edited a comment on  JENKINS-60407  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I was able to fix the issue by adding this to the JasC Config of the ec2 plugin:   {code:java} associatePublicIp: true  { { code } }    
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203464.1575911038000.6548.1578673920280%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60407) Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)

2020-01-10 Thread d...@fortysix.ch (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dominik Bartholdi commented on  JENKINS-60407  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I was able to fix the issue by adding this to the JasC Config of the ec2 plugin:  associatePublicIp: true {{}}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203464.1575911038000.6545.1578673860283%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60734) Replace js-builder with webpack

2020-01-10 Thread fqueir...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Félix Queiruga Balado updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60734  
 
 
  Replace js-builder with webpack   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Félix Queiruga Balado  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Right now Jenkins uses a combination of [js-builder|https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-builder] and gulp as the toolchain to build the frontend assets.There are many reasons to replace js-builder with a modern, industry-standard tool: * It does not support many new technologies and techniques commonly used nowadays, like post-css. * It is  not being actively maintained. * It is  a tool used only within the Jenkins project. This and the lack of comprehensive documentation makes it difficult for developers to modify or extend the toolchain. * It is based on outdated tools (i.e. browserify) and uses a module system that is incompatible with modern JS build tools.I propose basing the new frontend toolchain on [webpack|https://webpack.js.org/]. It is the tool that has the more usage, support and customizability.h3. The js-builder ecosystemjs-builder offers the possibility, using some sibling libraries ([js-modules|https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-modules], [js-libs|https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-libs]), to have shared libraries across multiple projects running on the same window. For example, if both Jenkins core and a plugin use the same version of jquery, it would only be loaded once.While this can seem like a great idea, having this behaviour on Core can be problematic. Having core load its own libraries would only add an extra 50-100KB of JS code. It introduces a huge maintainability burden and locks the project into using js-builder & friends.h3. Planned changesThe goal of this improvement is to replace js-builder with webpack, and use NPM versions of the js-libs used on the project (handlebars, jquery, bootstrap).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60734) Replace js-builder with webpack

2020-01-10 Thread fqueir...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Félix Queiruga Balado created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60734  
 
 
  Replace js-builder with webpack   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 core  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 16:08  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Félix Queiruga Balado  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Right now Jenkins uses a combination of js-builder and gulp as the toolchain to build the frontend assets. There are many reasons to replace js-builder with a modern, industry-standard tool: 
 
It does not support many new technologies and techniques commonly used nowadays, like post-css. 
It is a tool used only within the Jenkins project. This and the lack of comprehensive documentation makes it difficult for developers to modify or extend the toolchain. 
It is based on outdated tools (i.e. browserify) and uses a module system that is incompatible with modern JS build tools. 
 I propose basing the new frontend toolchain on webpack. It is the tool that has the more usage, support and customizability. The js-builder ecosystem js-builder offers the possibility, using some sibling libraries (js-modules, js-libs), to have shared libraries across multiple projects running on the same window. For example, if both Jenkins core and a plugin use the same version of jquery, it would only be loaded once. While this can seem like a great idea, having this behaviour on Core can be problematic. Having core load its own libraries would only add an extra 50-100KB of JS code. It introduces a huge maintainability burden and locks the project into using js-builder & friends. Planned changes The goal of this improvement is to replace js-builder with webpack, and use NPM versions of the js-libs used on the project (handlebars, jquery, bootstrap).  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60733) Collapse by defaults kubernetes sections in Jenkins Global Configuration

2020-01-10 Thread delrocq.math...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Mathieu Delrocq created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60733  
 
 
  Collapse by defaults kubernetes sections in Jenkins Global Configuration   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 kubernetes-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 15:28  
 
 
Labels: 
 plugin jenkins  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Mathieu Delrocq  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I purpose to add a default collapse to kubernetes cloud sections in the global configuration of Jenkins. In fact, we have a lot of kubernetes clouds and templates configured and it become difficult to navigate in the global configuration. You can take inspiration of docker-plugin wich implements it.      
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-39559) Job Config History Plugin saving config for a node other than the one being edited

2020-01-10 Thread robin.richard.sch...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Robin Schulz commented on  JENKINS-39559  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Job Config History Plugin saving config for a node other than the one being edited   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The problem here is that ComputerListener's methods don't provide information on which node's config has changed. So every node's config is persisted. Having activated the option to not save duplicates, this should still only save the config of the node for which you changed something unless you haven't altered other config.xmls manually or in another way that has not triggered the Saveable listener.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.176111.1478531414000.6536.1578669780415%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-55202) Performance Signature Plugin: JAXB API is missing with Java 11

2020-01-10 Thread raphael.pio...@t-systems.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Raphael Pionke updated  JENKINS-55202  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 PR with a proper fix: https://github.com/jenkinsci/performance-signature-dynatrace-plugin/pull/81  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-55202  
 
 
  Performance Signature Plugin: JAXB API is missing with Java 11   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Raphael Pionke  
 
 
Status: 
 Reopened Fixed but Unreleased  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+un

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60407) Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)

2020-01-10 Thread d...@fortysix.ch (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Dominik Bartholdi commented on  JENKINS-60407  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Launched instances cannot reach public internet (regression)   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 we have the exact same issue, I think this is caused by JENKINS-58578  I did some manual testing and setting a public IP on the agent solves the issue - this IP is set automatically on an agent launched with ec2-plugin:1.45 -> we had to go back to 1.45 too  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203464.1575911038000.6508.1578668220220%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59145) After Jenkins upgrade pipeline script from SCM configuration is no longer visible on the GUI

2020-01-10 Thread kovacs.laszlo....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 László Kovács commented on  JENKINS-59145  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: After Jenkins upgrade pipeline script from SCM configuration is no longer visible on the GUI   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It seems like a recurring problem with security plugins no matter what Jenkins versions we are using. With 2.138.3 Jenkins version after updating script-security plugin to version to 1.68 and permissive-script-security plugin is 0.5.  We don't use Prometheus plugin, but the issue is still the same. As I see new permissive-script-security plugin version (0.5) has complications with several other plugin and there is no fix for it currently. So you have to downgrade plugins to solve the issue.     
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.201579.156710687.6493.1578667740670%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-1877) Explanatory message at prepare for shutdown

2020-01-10 Thread jorge.p...@king.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 jpena updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-1877  
 
 
  Explanatory message at prepare for shutdown   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 jpena  
 
 
Comment: 
 +1. It would be super useful  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.131950.1213676576000.6491.1578667141554%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42811) Vsphere Cloud plugin stops working after a number of builds

2020-01-10 Thread jorge.p...@king.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jorge Peña commented on  JENKINS-42811  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Vsphere Cloud plugin stops working after a number of builds   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi pjdarton thank you for replying. Yes, when I wrote error I refered to the warning printed on the post above. After creating the issue I realised that having the value 2147483647 is just cosmetic.  We are relying on this plugin for creating and destroying jenkins agents on demand. This issue keeps happening with newer versions of the plugin so we are running a job recurrently in our Jenkins instance to avoid this issue. We didn't experience issues of memory. We had issues of VMs with duplicated names but I am not sure it was related with this workaround. We developed a small script that would destroy the virtual machines on vmware that weren't present in Jenkins, after all these are linked clones and were re-created again. Currently we are running Jenkins version: 2.150.3 vsphere-cloud plugin: 2.21 This is a piece of the log where it should create a new jenkins agent (the last one since we set up a hard limit of 50 agents) but it didn't create it 

 

Jan 10, 2020 3:11:32 PM INFO org.jenkinsci.plugins.vSphereCloud provision
provision(xcode-10.1,20): Provisioning 0 new =[]
Jan 10, 2020 3:11:32 PM INFO org.jenkinsci.plugins.vSphereCloud calculateMaxAdditionalSlavesPermitted
There are 49 VMs in this cloud. The instance cap for the cloud is 50, so we have room for more
Jan 10, 2020 3:11:32 PM INFO org.jenkinsci.plugins.vSphereCloud provision
provision(xcode-11.1,6): 0 existing slaves (=0 executors), templates available are [Template[prefix=sod-xxx-01, provisioned=[sod-xxx-011, sod-xxx-0110, sod-xxx-012, sod-xxx-013, sod-xxx-014, sod-xxx-015, sod-xxx-016, sod-xxx-017, sod-xxx-018, sod-xxx-019], planned=[], unwanted={}, max=10, fullness=100.000%]]
 

 That piece of log just keeps repeating over and over. After running the job with the mentioned workaround it starts creating agents again. Regards,  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 
 
Component/s: 
 parameterized-trigger-plugin  
 
 
Priority: 
 Major Critical  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202015.1568813775000.6453.1578666781051%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 
 
Priority: 
 Critical Blocker  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202015.1568813775000.6455.1578666781160%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60732) Node is repeated in execution

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60732  
 
 
  Node is repeated in execution   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Dominik Bartholdi  
 
 
Components: 
 nodelabelparameter-plugin, parameterized-trigger-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 14:31  
 
 
Labels: 
 nodelabelparameter parameterized-trigger  
 
 
Priority: 
  Blocker  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 When using All Nodes For Label Factory, the nodes in the execution are detected correctly (per log under job//build#) but the nodes that the triggered job actually runs in are not right, and a Node is used more than once (usually the first discovered).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-56764) Pipeline fails on some AMI images / node types because of Broken Pipe

2020-01-10 Thread alexander.bachme...@continental-corporation.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Alexander Bachmeier commented on  JENKINS-56764  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline fails on some AMI images / node types because of Broken Pipe   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We are also encountering this issue (EKS v1.14.9).  Has anyone been able to make progress on this issue?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.198407.1553610802000.6446.1578666540588%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60716) Loss of exception detail in LogRotator failures

2020-01-10 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Jesse Glick commented on  JENKINS-60716  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Loss of exception detail in LogRotator failures   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Yes, the regression was detected in 2.204.1.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203964.1578599933000.6422.1578665940220%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60539) Make build history timeline limit configurable (BuildTimelineWidget)

2020-01-10 Thread gmahi...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Guillaume MAHIEUX commented on  JENKINS-60539  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Make build history timeline limit configurable (BuildTimelineWidget)   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, any news on this? Thank you!  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203642.1576755244000.6413.1578665340057%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 
 
Comment: 
 There is a similar problem when there are two groups of nodes : 6 nodes with TESTPC label and 6 nodes with PRODPC label. The plugin would send the run call to all of them regardless of the label they have, this is a big issue of broken functionality.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202015.1568813775000.6406.1578664860589%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've 6 similar nodes, that share a label "TESTPC" when I configure the job to trigger with that label the plugin works fine as it triggers on all 6 nodes.{{I have added the label "TESTPC1", "TESTPC2", and so on in each node since every now and then we want to run the job on only one specific node, however what ends up happening is that the job is run in any of the computers that have the "TESTPC" label and only in one (most usually not the intended one). I also tried putting a label that doesn't share the any letter with the other labels on my node ("banana") but the problem still persists.}}{{-The same applies when I have groups of different nodes with a single label. }}{{-There is the same problem with the Node - Factory part of the plugin.}}{{Here is the log of a build that should have run on TESTPC1,2 and 3, but instead run on TESPC 5 (twice) and PRODPC6 (PC with different label)}}{code:java}Started by user  [8mha:4GcLNmTz8oi6tKjMMjxnTRRbUCKLrip2lyOZlKIRHdypmx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAyuEgZ+/dLi1CL94syUktTiktQiAKFXgYvE [0m Running as SYSTEM Building remotely on  [8mha:4JNmtgR2g18637CcH5OrJjPvakAXl1al6Pij6HjPxIbMnR+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAz2EgZB/eT83ILSktQi/WBnR78AZzMAOdpwt8Y= [0mTESTPC6 (TESTPC) in workspace C:/jenkins/workspace/ define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC1] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC2] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC3] Triggering projects:  [8mha:4GEYBZuNUHdwWOzB3SOyspk29pTLutRnS9YcoIxnTpKWlx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQSajNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc+jsiC1KCczL9svvyTVzHb1RttJBUeZGJg8GdhyUvPSSzJ8GJhLi3JKGIR8shLLEvVzEvPS9YNLijLz0q0rihik0IxzhtAgwxgggJGJgaGiAMgQKGEQ08/KT9J3zSvLLMrPy03NKwlOLSkt0AcArVNUhJs= [0mFinished: SUCCESS{code}Which seems to indicate that the job was send to build before the nodes were selected.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've 6 similar nodes, that share a label "TESTPC" when I configure the job to trigger with that label the plugin works fine as it triggers on all 6 nodes.{{I have added the label "TESTPC1", "TESTPC2", and so on in each node since every now and then we want to run the job on only one specific node, however what ends up happening is that the job is run in any of the computers that have the "TESTPC" label and only in one (most usually not the intended one). I also tried putting a label that doesn't share the any letter with the other labels on my node ("banana") but the problem still persists.}}{{-The same applies when I have groups of different nodes with a single label.    i.e. 12 nodes 6 with TESTPC and 6 with PRODPC }} {{-There is the same problem with the Node - Factory part of the plugin.}}{{Here is the log of a build that should have run on TESTPC1,2 and 3, but instead run on TESPC 5 (twice) and PRODPC6 (PC with different label)}}{code:java}Started by user  [8mha:4GcLNmTz8oi6tKjMMjxnTRRbUCKLrip2lyOZlKIRHdypmx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAyuEgZ+/dLi1CL94syUktTiktQiAKFXgYvE [0m Running as SYSTEM Building remotely on  [8mha:4JNmtgR2g18637CcH5OrJjPvakAXl1al6Pij6HjPxIbMnR+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAz2EgZB/eT83ILSktQi/WBnR78AZzMAOdpwt8Y= [0mTESTPC6 (TESTPC) in workspace C:/jenkins/workspace/ define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC1] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC2] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC3] Triggering projects:  [8mha:4GEYBZuNUHdwWOzB3SOyspk29pTLutRnS9YcoIxnTpKWlx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQSajNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc+jsiC1KCczL9svvyTVzHb1RttJBUeZGJg8GdhyUvPSSzJ8GJhLi3JKGIR8shLLEvVzEvPS9YNLijLz0q0rihik0IxzhtAgwxgggJGJgaGiAMgQKGEQ08/KT9J3zSvLLMrPy03NKwlOLSkt0AcArVNUhJs= [0mFinished: SUCCESS{code}Which seems to indicate that the job was send to build before the nodes were selected.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59431  
 
 
  When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I've 6 similar nodes, that share a label "TESTPC" when I configure the job to trigger with that label the plugin works fine as it triggers on all 6 nodes. {{ I have added the label "TESTPC1", "TESTPC2", and so on in each node since every now and then we want to run the job on only one specific node, however what ends up happening is that the job is run in any of the computers that have the "TESTPC" label and only in one (most usually not the intended one). I also tried putting a label that doesn't share the any letter with the other labels on my node ("banana") but the problem still persists. }}{{-The same applies when I have groups of different nodes with a single label. }}{{-There is the same problem with the Node - Factory part of the plugin.}}{{Here is the log of a build that should have run on TESTPC1,2 and 3, but instead run on TESPC 5 (twice) and PRODPC6 (PC with different label)}}{code:java}Started by user  [8mha:4GcLNmTz8oi6tKjMMjxnTRRbUCKLrip2lyOZlKIRHdypmx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAyuEgZ+/dLi1CL94syUktTiktQiAKFXgYvE [0m Running as SYSTEM Building remotely on  [8mha:4JNmtgR2g18637CcH5OrJjPvakAXl1al6Pij6HjPxIbMnR+LCP9b85aBtbiIQTGjNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc83PyU1x6OyILUoJzMv2y+/JJUBAhiZGBgqihhk0NSjKDWzXb3RdlLBUSYGJk8GtpzUvPSSDB8G5tKinBIGIZ+sxLJE/ZzEvHT94JKizLx0a6BxUmjGOUNodHsLgAz2EgZB/eT83ILSktQi/WBnR78AZzMAOdpwt8Y= [0mTESTPC6 (TESTPC) in workspace C:/jenkins/workspace/ define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC1] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC2] define: [LabelParameterValue: NODELABEL=TESTPC3] Triggering projects:  [8mha:4GEYBZuNUHdwWOzB3SOyspk29pTLutRnS9YcoIxnTpKWlx+LCP9b85aBtbiIQSajNKU4P08vOT+vOD8nVc+jsiC1KCczL9svvyTVzHb1RttJBUeZGJg8GdhyUvPSSzJ8GJhLi3JKGIR8shLLEvVzEvPS9YNLijLz0q0rihik0IxzhtAgwxgggJGJgaGiAMgQKGEQ08/KT9J3zSvLLMrPy03NKwlOLSkt0AcArVNUhJs= [0mFinished: SUCCESS{code}Which seems to indicate that the job was send to build before the nodes were selected.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60731) Review return values in the Computer API being used by node monitors

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60731  
 
 
  Review return values in the Computer API being used by node monitors   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Issue Type: 
 Improvement Task  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203982.1578663465000.6398.1578663480218%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60731) Review return values in the Computer API being used by node monitors

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60731  
 
 
  Review return values in the Computer API being used by node monitors   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Components: 
 core  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 13:37  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We could probably generalize the API a bit. See https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4271#pullrequestreview-341032013  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60507) Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled

2020-01-10 Thread demenk...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Konstantin Demenkov edited a comment on  JENKINS-60507  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have the same issue on latest 2. 201 204.1  LTS. It appears pretty often (10% of jobs) in working with proxmox slaves over proxmox cloud plugin and jnlp. I suspect some incompatibility in timeouts/ connection's logic between master and proxmox slaves, but really don't know, why it happens.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203598.157651039.6394.1578660540277%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60687) Extend the InfluxDB plugin to send metrics from Serenity reports to InfluxDB

2020-01-10 Thread aleksi.sim...@eficode.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Aleksi Simell commented on  JENKINS-60687  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Extend the InfluxDB plugin to send metrics from Serenity reports to InfluxDB   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Make a fork from the plugin repository and create a new file for the generator. Pretty good guidelines can be found from other generators. You will most probably need the `buildAction` from the plugin and then it's just looking at the Serenity plugin code to get the correct data. Finally, you will need to call the generator inside `InfluxDbPublicationService.java` to actually use the generator. Additionally, unit tests for the generator would be nice  I know the plugin lacks sufficient unit tests, but there should be some tests for other generators you can use as a base.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203931.1578474488000.6392.1578660300144%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59431) When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node

2020-01-10 Thread yotu....@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karolina Arancibia Valuskova commented on  JENKINS-59431  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: When using node label's "All Nodes for Label Factory" on single label node, it runs job on wrong node   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 There is a similar problem when there are two groups of nodes : 6 nodes with TESTPC label and 6 nodes with PRODPC label. The plugin would send the run call to all of them regardless of the label they have, this is a big issue of broken functionality.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202015.1568813775000.6389.1578659700107%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58207) 2.181 JNA update breaks NegotiateSSO

2020-01-10 Thread s.rademac...@live.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Stefan Rademacher commented on  JENKINS-58207  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: 2.181 JNA update breaks NegotiateSSO   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I checked it on our two jenkins servers. Metadata is up-to-date on both, but none shows the 1.4 version. I am going to upgrade manually, if no one else has this issue. Thx  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200266.1561541748000.6377.1578659640519%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58194) Unsatisfied dependencies gitlab-hook

2020-01-10 Thread elekakos2...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Elek Akos commented on  JENKINS-58194  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Unsatisfied dependencies gitlab-hook   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Install Java 8  

 

java version "1.8.0_231"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_231-b11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.231-b11, mixed mode)
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200249.156149246.6361.1578658980409%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60730) Add possibility to exclude branches and tags older than X days

2020-01-10 Thread daniel.stei...@mail.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Daniel Steiert created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60730  
 
 
  Add possibility to exclude branches and tags older than X days   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  New Feature  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 github-branch-source-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 12:20  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Daniel Steiert  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Problem Statement We have had problems with anything that reacts to multiple branches or tags for quite some time now. Any form of multibranch plugin or plugins that check for tags, Pull Requests or anything like it. They all cause issues as soon as there is either an upgrade in which there are no logs from previous builds, after a disaster with data-loss or when re-running certain seed-jobs that modify (e.g. multibranch-) configurations. The issue presents itself in the form of complications due to rebuilds of every single branch, PR and tag for every single repository, at the same time.  This might not be a problem for small and very short builds, but it becomes a huge issue for anything that runs longer than 5 minutes. Firstly, this blocks the ability to build current and urgent jobs (since all slaves are busy building old branches/tags/PRs). Secondly, it requires immense amounts of resources (often times all of them, even if that means 120+ x 16 GB with 4 cores slaves) that wouldn't have to be used necessarily. Thirdly, the Jenkins Master almost always suffers from further crashes or erratic behaviour, since a lot of jobs are queueing up, all slaves are engaged and there is in general a lot of load on the system (unnecessarily so). This kind of behaviour can not only be experienced on older environments with static slaves and everything running on VMs, but more specifically on more modern setups in which the Jenkins is created and runs stateless in a Kubernetes cluster.  If there was a way to restrict or ignore old/stale branches/tags/PRs, basically all of the above mentioned problems could be solved. Feature Proposal The github-branch-source-plugin is one of the plugins that caus

[JIRA] (JENKINS-55787) Switch labels from entry to checkbox

2020-01-10 Thread gregory.zu...@datadoghq.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Gregory Zussa commented on  JENKINS-55787  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Switch labels from entry to checkbox   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Regarding the Datadog Plugin, we should be good with our latest release 1.0.0. Let us know if this is not the case. - https://github.com/jenkinsci/datadog-plugin/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/datadog/jenkins/plugins/datadog/DatadogGlobalConfiguration/config.jelly#L77-L81 - https://github.com/jenkinsci/datadog-plugin/blob/master/src/main/resources/org/datadog/jenkins/plugins/datadog/DatadogJobProperty/config.jelly#L19  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.197176.1548453513000.6348.1578658500200%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60507) Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled

2020-01-10 Thread demenk...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Konstantin Demenkov updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60507  
 
 
  Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Konstantin Demenkov  
 
 
Priority: 
 Minor Major  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203598.157651039.6344.1578658260325%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60640) Support rename job and sync it in pipeline module in ALM Octane

2020-01-10 Thread radislav.berkov...@microfocus.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Radi Berkovich updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60640  
 
 
  Support rename job and sync it in pipeline module in ALM Octane   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Radi Berkovich  
 
 
Labels: 
 6.0.4-BETA Octane  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203878.1578238949000.6345.1578658260346%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60670) StackOverflowError due to the HP ALM implementation of GraphListener

2020-01-10 Thread radislav.berkov...@microfocus.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Radi Berkovich updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60670  
 
 
  StackOverflowError due to the HP ALM implementation of GraphListener   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Radi Berkovich  
 
 
Labels: 
 Octane  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203913.1578384494000.6342.1578658260293%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60640) Support rename job and sync it in pipeline module in ALM Octane

2020-01-10 Thread radislav.berkov...@microfocus.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Radi Berkovich updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60640  
 
 
  Support rename job and sync it in pipeline module in ALM Octane   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Radi Berkovich  
 
 
Labels: 
 6.0.4-BETA Octane  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203878.1578238949000.6340.1578658200069%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60670) StackOverflowError due to the HP ALM implementation of GraphListener

2020-01-10 Thread radislav.berkov...@microfocus.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Radi Berkovich commented on  JENKINS-60670  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: StackOverflowError due to the HP ALM implementation of GraphListener   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi I see that you use 5.6.2 version of plugin.  We did many improvements in the area. And now latest version is 6.0 .   If its possible , can you please check if the issue is reproducible on more updated version.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203913.1578384494000.6339.1578657900838%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60507) Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled

2020-01-10 Thread demenk...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Konstantin Demenkov commented on  JENKINS-60507  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stuck when allocating machine | node block appears to be neither running nor scheduled   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have the same issue on latest 2.201 LTS. It appears pretty often (10% of jobs) in working with proxmox slaves over proxmox cloud plugin and jnlp. I suspect some incompatibility in timeouts/ connection's logic between master and proxmox slaves, but really don't know, why it happens.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203598.157651039.6337.1578657840136%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60727) Add capability to clean submodules' submodules

2020-01-10 Thread bill@bill.works (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Bill Collins commented on  JENKINS-60727  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Add capability to clean submodules' submodules   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 git-client-plugin PR: https://github.com/jenkinsci/git-client-plugin/pull/489  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203976.1578651595000.6327.1578656040309%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60727) Add capability to clean submodules' submodules

2020-01-10 Thread bill@bill.works (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Bill Collins started work on  JENKINS-60727  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Bill Collins  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203976.1578651595000.6326.1578656040298%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60727) Add capability to clean submodules' submodules

2020-01-10 Thread bill@bill.works (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Bill Collins assigned an issue to Bill Collins  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60727  
 
 
  Add capability to clean submodules' submodules   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Bill Collins  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Mark Waite Bill Collins  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203976.1578651595000.6325.1578656040260%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60712) Copied managed config file should be removed when block ends

2020-01-10 Thread and...@hammar.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Anders Hammar updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60712  
 
 
  Copied managed config file should be removed when block ends   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Anders Hammar  
 
 
Environment: 
 nodejs-plugin Jenkins 2.190.3 (on RHEL7 with openJDK 1.8.0)Token Macro Plugin v2.10Config FIle Provider Plugin v3.6.2NodeJS Plugin  v1.3.4  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203960.157858259.6323.1578655860225%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60720) Possibility to specify if env variables should be filtered or not in npm config file

2020-01-10 Thread and...@hammar.net (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Anders Hammar updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60720  
 
 
  Possibility to specify if env variables should be filtered or not in npm config file   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Anders Hammar  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.190.3 (on RHEL7 with openJDK 1.8.0)Token Macro Plugin v2.10Config FIle Provider Plugin v3.6.2NodeJS Plugin 1.3.4  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203969.157864169.6321.1578655800059%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev commented on  JENKINS-60381  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Also created https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/2757 for the Administrative Monitors update  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6314.1578655500210%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60381  
 
 
  Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Released As: 
 remoting 3.40, Jenkins 2.214  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6316.1578655500237%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev commented on  JENKINS-60381  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jeff Thompson Docker packaging will also need to be updated to close this story  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6305.1578654900568%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev started work on  JENKINS-60381  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Status: 
 Open In Progress  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6301.1578654840454%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60381  
 
 
  Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Component/s: 
 docker  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6303.1578654840506%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60381) Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols

2020-01-10 Thread o.v.nenas...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Oleg Nenashev updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60381  
 
 
  Remove old, deprecated remoting protocols   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Oleg Nenashev  
 
 
Priority: 
 Minor Critical  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203430.1575564508000.6299.1578654840407%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-59671) Support storing multiple Jenkins credentials in a single Secrets Manager secret

2020-01-10 Thread chris+jenk...@chriskilding.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Chris Kilding resolved as Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-59671  
 
 
  Support storing multiple Jenkins credentials in a single Secrets Manager secret   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Chris Kilding  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Resolved  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Won't Do  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.202363.1570221511000.6297.1578654600093%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60729) Calender View Plugin not showing past builds data

2020-01-10 Thread prashanth.kas...@broadridge.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 prashanth kasoju updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60729  
 
 
  Calender View Plugin not showing past builds data
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 prashanth kasoju  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi Team,We have installed Calender View Plugin(0.3.1) and till dec29 it was working fine and on 30 and 31st dec   2019  the data is not shown. Data is showing again from 1st jan . we have seen 2 days scheduled data missing.can some one please help me the below issue.Just curious to understand is there any issue with plugin? attached is the screenshot  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203978.1578654206000.6296.1578654420156%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60675) An automated ant build called from Jenkins fails

2020-01-10 Thread kwi...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karl Wirth commented on  JENKINS-60675  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: An automated ant build called from Jenkins fails
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi Peeush Trikha - I just wanted to check if you had seen my previous comment.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203918.1578391928000.6294.1578654300238%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60729) Calender View Plugin not showing past builds data

2020-01-10 Thread prashanth.kas...@broadridge.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 prashanth kasoju created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60729  
 
 
  Calender View Plugin not showing past builds data
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Sven Schoenung  
 
 
Attachments: 
 calenderview (1).png  
 
 
Components: 
 calendar-view-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-01-10 11:03  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 prashanth kasoju  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi Team, We have installed Calender View Plugin(0.3.1) and till dec29 it was working fine and on 30 and 31st dec the data is not shown. Data is showing again from 1st jan . we have seen 2 days scheduled data missing. can some one please help me the below issue.Just curious to understand is there any issue with plugin?   attached is the screenshot  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 

  1   2   >