[JIRA] (JENKINS-5371) Cannot push tags back

2016-11-07 Thread david.antl...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Antliff reopened an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Please reconsider this issue in light of my earlier comment.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-5371  
 
 
  Cannot push tags back   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 David Antliff  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 
 
Status: 
 Closed Reopened  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-5371) Cannot push tags back

2016-11-07 Thread david.antl...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Antliff commented on  JENKINS-5371  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Cannot push tags back   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This isn't really fixed in my opinion - the plugin page still mentions the non-existent option, and the GitPublisher plugin doesn't have a way to push all tags - it can only push tags that can be explicitly named, so it's not useful for dynamically named tags that Jenkins doesn't know about.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-22761) Missing links to source in cppcheck plugin

2016-09-27 Thread david.antl...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Antliff commented on  JENKINS-22761  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Missing links to source in cppcheck plugin   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Just a note that the wiki, as currently written, does not cope with result entries that contain the optional file0 attribute. I've posted a comment to elaborate here: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Cppcheck+Plugin?focusedCommentId=100697392#comment-100697392  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-38081) Shared Workspace with empty Name becomes the default Shared Workspace in new jobs

2016-09-08 Thread david.antl...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 David Antliff created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-38081  
 
 
  Shared Workspace with empty Name becomes the default Shared Workspace in new jobs   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 shared-workspace-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2016/Sep/08 10:55 PM  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.21  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 David Antliff  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 If, under Configure System, a new entry is created for Workspace Sharing and it is not given a Name or Repository URL (i.e. left blank), it is still useable as a shared workspace. However when new Freestyle jobs are created they now default to using this shared workspace. This has unintended consequences as users do not realise they need to select "None" under a job's Shared Workspace config section. If they fail to do this, the job will use the shared workspace, which is unexpected and a source of problems. If a name is defined, new jobs no longer default to this workspace - they default to None instead, as I believe the should.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment