[JIRA] (JENKINS-61085) TmpCleaner plugin fails with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jruby.ext.posix.Linux64HeapFileStat

2020-02-13 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-61085  
 
 
  TmpCleaner plugin fails with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jruby.ext.posix.Linux64HeapFileStat   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 tmpcleaner-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2020-02-13 16:41  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.190.3  TmpCleaner plugin 1.3  Linux x64 (CentOS 7.6)  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Petr H  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 At Jenkins slaves there are lots of exceptions such as 

 
Feb 13, 2020 10:06:15 AM hudson.plugins.tmpcleaner.TmpCleanTask delete
INFO: Deletion failed: /tmp/tmpclean8686648300166673561.tmp
Feb 13, 2020 10:06:15 AM hudson.remoting.UserRequest perform
WARNING: LinkageError while performing UserRequest:hudson.plugins.tmpcleaner.TmpCleanTask@3ddab2ff
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jruby.ext.posix.Linux64HeapFileStat
at org.jruby.ext.posix.LinuxPOSIX.allocateStat(LinuxPOSIX.java:44)
at org.jruby.ext.posix.LinuxPOSIX.lstat(LinuxPOSIX.java:72)
at hudson.plugins.tmpcleaner.TmpCleanTask.visit(TmpCleanTask.java:99)
at hudson.plugins.tmpcleaner.TmpCleanTask.call(TmpCleanTask.java:50)
at hudson.plugins.tmpcleaner.TmpCleanTask.call(TmpCleanTask.java:24)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:212)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:54)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:369)
at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-57205) Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge

2020-01-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H edited a comment on  JENKINS-57205  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 In our case it was failing even with the git client plugin 2.9.0 (git plugin 3.12.1) in some cases. However I noticed that after creating a copy of one problematic jenkins job the new one didn't exhibit the issue. Both (old) job  bonfigs  configs  were identical, therefore I cleared the old job's workspace (at all jenkins slaves) and it started working again. You may try that if you encounter the issue.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.198962.1556378819000.2897.1578332640258%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-57205) Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge

2020-01-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-57205  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 In our case it was failing even with the git client plugin 2.9.0 (git plugin 3.12.1) in some cases. However I noticed that after creating a copy of one problematic jenkins job the new one didn't exhibit the issue. Both (old) job bonfigs were identical, therefore I cleared the old job's workspace (at all jenkins slaves) and it started working again. You may try that if you encounter the issue.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.198962.1556378819000.2892.1578332400175%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-57205) Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge

2019-12-18 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-57205  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Null pointer exception in JGit pre-build merge   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I wouldn't rate this as a Minor bug. Today this started hitting us as well and it affected a lot of jobs at once. Could be rather caused by the git client plugin, but in the end the NPE occurs in the git plugin code.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.198962.1556378819000.12013.1576673580215%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49325) @script folder contains full git checkout and is not deleted on cleanup

2019-11-28 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-49325  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: @script folder contains full git checkout and is not deleted on cleanup   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Having the same issue. It's really annoying and can consume a lot of disk space if you've got a multitude of multibranch jobs. Note that the @script directory isn't the only one, There's also @libs: workspace@script, workspace@libs.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.188188.1517523474000.8880.1574950741346%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-54959) Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account

2019-10-15 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H edited a comment on  JENKINS-54959  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 - automatically installed JDK (when it worked):hudson.model.JDK/JDK8u152/bin/- manually downloaded and locally used binary archive (jdk-8u212-linux-x64.tar.gz in this example):hudson.model.JDK/JDK8/*jdk1.8.0_212*/bin/Although I can set the *Subdirectory of extracted archive* to "jdk1.8.0_212" (for the above example) which sets the java home correctly, I'd like to get the same result as with the automatically installed JDK - e.g. without that additional subdirectory  in the filesystem path .  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195983.1543566344000.8429.1571185440333%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-54959) Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account

2019-10-15 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H edited a comment on  JENKINS-54959  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 - automatically installed JDK (when it worked):hudson.model.JDK/JDK8u152/bin/- manually downloaded and locally used binary archive (jdk-8u212-linux-x64.tar.gz in this example):hudson.model.JDK/JDK8/*jdk1.8.0_212*/bin/  Although I can set the *Subdirectory of extracted archive* to "jdk1.8.0_212" (for the above example) which sets the java home correctly, I'd like to get the same result as with the automatically installed JDK - e.g. without that additional subdirectory.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195983.1543566344000.8423.1571185380197%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-54959) Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account

2019-10-15 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-54959  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Offer a new Unarchive installer which takes Java archive structure into account   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
automatically installed JDK (when it worked): hudson.model.JDK/JDK8u152/bin/ 
manually downloaded and locally used binary archive (jdk-8u212-linux-x64.tar.gz in this example): hudson.model.JDK/JDK8/jdk1.8.0_212/bin/ Although I can set the Subdirectory of extracted archive to "jdk1.8.0_212" (for the above example) which sets the java home correctly, I'd like to get the same result as with the automatically installed JDK - e.g. without that additional subdirectory. 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.195983.1543566344000.8421.1571185260347%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-49392) Violations plugin freezes project settings screen

2018-05-11 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-49392  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Violations plugin freezes project settings screen   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I encountered a very similar issue during the Jenkins startup after it's been updated from 2.107.2 to 2.107.3. Downgraded to 2.107.2 for now and will look into the possibility to remove the Violations plugin. During the startup jenkins.log ends up at: 

 
May 11, 2018 6:45:12 PM jenkins.InitReactorRunner$1 onAttained
INFO: Prepared all plugins 

 And one thread can be seen utilizing 100% CPU and doing the following: 

 
"Initializing plugin sonar" #34 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x7fc6e400e800 nid=0x4700 runnable [0x7fc7129cb000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at org.kxml2.io.KXmlParser.next(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor$ParseMessages.toTag(FindBugsDescriptor.java:141)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor$ParseMessages.doIt(FindBugsDescriptor.java:123)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor$ParseMessages.execute(FindBugsDescriptor.java:115)
at hudson.plugins.violations.parse.ParseXML.parse(ParseXML.java:44)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor.parseMessages(FindBugsDescriptor.java:102)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor.parseMessages(FindBugsDescriptor.java:93)
at hudson.plugins.violations.types.findbugs.FindBugsDescriptor.(FindBugsDescriptor.java:88)
at hudson.plugins.violations.TypeDescriptor.(TypeDescriptor.java:95)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.jvcts.config.ViolationsToBitbucketServerConfigHelper.createNewConfig(ViolationsToBitbucketServerConfigHelper.java:38)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.jvcts.ViolationsToBitbucketServerDescriptor.(ViolationsToBitbucketServerDescriptor.java:31)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.jvcts.ViolationsToBitbucketServerRecorder.(ViolationsToBitbucketServerRecorder.java:23)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.ensureClassInitialized(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.UnsafeFieldAccessorFactory.newFieldAccessor(UnsafeFieldAccessorFactory.java:43)
at sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory.newFieldAccessor(ReflectionFactory.java:142)
at java.lang.reflect.Field.acquireFieldAccessor(Field.java:1088)
at java.lang.reflect.Field.getFieldAccessor(Field.java:1069)
at java.lang.reflect.Field.get(Field.java:393)
at net.java.sezpoz.IndexItem.instance(IndexItem.java:185)
at hudson.ExtensionFinder$GuiceFinder.instantiate(ExtensionFinder.java:353)
at hudson.ExtensionFinder$GuiceFinder.access$700(ExtensionFinder.java:232)
at hudson.ExtensionFinder$GuiceFinder$SezpozModule$1.get(ExtensionFinder.java:526)
at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderInternalFactory.provision(ProviderInternalFactory.java:81)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalFactoryToInitializableAdapter.provision(InternalFactoryToInitializableAdapter.java:53)
at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderInternalFactory.circularGet(ProviderInternalFactory.java:61)
at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-41767) Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method

2017-02-07 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H commented on  JENKINS-41767  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It might be possible that it isn't being caused by the NodeJS plugin itself, but then: 1. Why it started to occur after updating only this single plugin (and nothing else)? 2. Why it's the only plugin appearing in the stack trace: 

 
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method!
at org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config.getDescriptor(Config.java:108)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.configfiles.GlobalConfigFiles.getConfigs(GlobalConfigFiles.java:91)
at jenkins.plugins.nodejs.NodeJSBuildWrapper$DescriptorImpl.getConfigs(NodeJSBuildWrapper.java:137)
... 189 more 

 With the above 2 points - how are we supposed to find out the other plugin that's the cause is it isn't the NodeJS one?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41767) Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method

2017-02-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41767  
 
 
  Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Petr H  
 
 
Environment: 
 CentOS 7.3, JDK 8u112, Jenkins 2.32. 2 1 , NodeJS Plugin 1.0  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41767) Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method

2017-02-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41767  
 
 
  Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 nodejs-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2017/Feb/06 6:18 PM  
 
 
Environment: 
 CentOS 7.3, JDK 8u112, Jenkins 2.32.2, NodeJS Plugin 1.0  
 
 
Labels: 
 nodejs illegalstateexception getdescriptor  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Petr H  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After trying the NodeJS Plugin upgrade to version 1.0 (which we had to roll back due to JENKINS-41535) we could see the following exceptions when attempting to load the Job configuration page for jobs utilizing this plugin: 

 
Jan 31, 2017 8:18:48 AM hudson.ExpressionFactory2$JexlExpression evaluate
WARNING: Caught exception evaluating: descriptor.configs in .../configure. Reason: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.PropertyExecutor.execute(PropertyExecutor.java:125)
at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-41767) Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method

2017-02-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41767  
 
 
  Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Petr H  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After trying the NodeJS Plugin upgrade to version 1.0 (which we had to roll back due to JENKINS-41535) we could see the following exceptions (in jenkins log) when attempting to load the Job configuration page for jobs utilizing this plugin:{noformat}Jan 31, 2017 8:18:48 AM hudson.ExpressionFactory2$JexlExpression evaluateWARNING: Caught exception evaluating: descriptor.configs in .../configure. Reason: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetExceptionjava.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetExceptionat sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.PropertyExecutor.execute(PropertyExecutor.java:125)at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.introspection.UberspectImpl$VelGetterImpl.invoke(UberspectImpl.java:314)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTArrayAccess.evaluateExpr(ASTArrayAccess.java:185)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTIdentifier.execute(ASTIdentifier.java:75)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReference.execute(ASTReference.java:83)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReference.value(ASTReference.java:57)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReferenceExpression.value(ASTReferenceExpression.java:51)at org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:80)at hudson.ExpressionFactory2$JexlExpression.evaluate(ExpressionFactory2.java:74)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript.run(CallTagLibScript.java:58)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript$1.run(CallTagLibScript.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.define.InvokeBodyTag.doTag(InvokeBodyTag.java:91)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:269)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.ReallyStaticTagLibrary$1.run(ReallyStaticTagLibrary.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.ReallyStaticTagLibrary$1.run(ReallyStaticTagLibrary.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.CoreTagLibrary$2.run(CoreTagLibrary.java:105)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript.run(CallTagLibScript.java:120)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.CoreTagLibrary$2.run(CoreTagLibrary.java:105)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.JellyViewScript.run(JellyViewScript.java:95)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.IncludeTag.doTag(IncludeTag.java:147)at 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-41767) Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method

2017-02-06 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Petr H updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41767  
 
 
  Exception in jenkins log: class org.jenkinsci.lib.configprovider.model.Config must override 'getDescriptor()' this method   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Petr H  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After trying the NodeJS Plugin upgrade to version 1.0 (which we had to roll back due to JENKINS-41535) we could see the following exceptions  (in jenkins log)  when attempting to load the Job configuration page for jobs utilizing this plugin:{noformat}Jan 31, 2017 8:18:48 AM hudson.ExpressionFactory2$JexlExpression evaluateWARNING: Caught exception evaluating: descriptor.configs in .../configure. Reason: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetExceptionjava.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetExceptionat sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.PropertyExecutor.execute(PropertyExecutor.java:125)at org.apache.commons.jexl.util.introspection.UberspectImpl$VelGetterImpl.invoke(UberspectImpl.java:314)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTArrayAccess.evaluateExpr(ASTArrayAccess.java:185)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTIdentifier.execute(ASTIdentifier.java:75)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReference.execute(ASTReference.java:83)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReference.value(ASTReference.java:57)at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTReferenceExpression.value(ASTReferenceExpression.java:51)at org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:80)at hudson.ExpressionFactory2$JexlExpression.evaluate(ExpressionFactory2.java:74)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript.run(CallTagLibScript.java:58)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript$1.run(CallTagLibScript.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.define.InvokeBodyTag.doTag(InvokeBodyTag.java:91)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:269)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.ReallyStaticTagLibrary$1.run(ReallyStaticTagLibrary.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.ReallyStaticTagLibrary$1.run(ReallyStaticTagLibrary.java:99)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.CoreTagLibrary$2.run(CoreTagLibrary.java:105)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.CallTagLibScript.run(CallTagLibScript.java:120)at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:95)at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.CoreTagLibrary$2.run(CoreTagLibrary.java:105)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.JellyViewScript.run(JellyViewScript.java:95)at org.kohsuke.stapler.jelly.IncludeTag.doTag(IncludeTag.java:147)at 

[JIRA] [active-directory-plugin] (JENKINS-32033) Support for multiple domain controllers

2015-12-11 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Petr H created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-32033 
 
 
 
  Support for multiple domain controllers  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Bug 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 

 Unassigned 
 
 
 

Components:
 

 active-directory-plugin 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 11/Dec/15 1:13 PM 
 
 
 

Environment:
 

 Jenkins 1.637  Active Directory plugin 1.41 
 
 
 

Labels:
 

 active directory plugin failover 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Major 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 Petr H 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the case of LDAP plugin it's possible to provide list of multiple ldap servers separated by space, see for example 

JENKINS-16443
 
But in the case of Active directory plugin it doesn't work as entering the following in the server entry: dc3.intra.net:3268 10.1.1.11:3268 dc2.intra.net:3268 leads to: 

 
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: 

[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-20550) download artifacts is very slow

2013-11-25 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)














































Petr H
 commented on  JENKINS-20550


download artifacts is very slow















I confirm the same. 1.538 here.
I had to replace the trilead-ssh2-build217-jenkins-3.jar library with older trilead-ssh2-build214-jenkins-3.jar from 1.536 which significantly improved performance.



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-20550) download artifacts is very slow

2013-11-25 Thread host...@post.cz (JIRA)












































 
Petr H
 edited a comment on  JENKINS-20550


download artifacts is very slow
















I confirm the same. 1.538 here.
I had to replace the trilead-ssh2-build217-jenkins-3.jar library with older trilead-ssh2-build214-jenkins-3.jar from 1.535 which significantly improved performance.



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.