[JIRA] (JENKINS-8374) Launch slave using JNLP

2019-05-08 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-8374  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Launch slave using JNLP   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I want to continue the discussion on this feature request. I find that proposed enhancement quite appealing. We are currently reworking our Jenkins setup and will create custom AMIs for Windows that have all necessary tools installed (Java, Git, Maven, ...). It's trivial to also add an autostart script that starts a slave that connects to the master via JNLP. In fact I have that already working. The script takes the required connection information (master URL, slave name, and secret) from the instance's user data. Therefore the only piece that is missing is support for JNLP slaves in the EC2 plugin and the ability to start the instance with the correct user data. There are two major advantages over the current approach: 
 
It's much faster since WinRM isn't involved. 
It doesn't require SMB (especially not the almost dead SMB1 version) 
 I am willing to work on a pull request for this feature if there are good chances that it will be integrated into the official release. Any opinions on that?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.138484.1293642462000.21039.1557347700287%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-46089) ProcessTreeKiller broken in pipeline jobs

2018-05-01 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-46089  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: ProcessTreeKiller broken in pipeline jobs   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 It would be a real shame if this very useful functionality wasn't available in Pipeline jobs. We use it to deploy the full application stack after a build which can then be used for testing and playing around. Since we have many branches it's not feasible to set up environments outside of Jenkins and somehow deploy the build results.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) “Could not initialize class ProcessLiveness$LibC” running sh on Windows

2017-03-29 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: “Could not initialize class ProcessLiveness$LibC” running sh on Windows   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Well, everything works perfectly with Freestyle jobs under Windows. This essentially means, executing shell (bash) scripts under Windows isn't supported with pipelines? And I guess I cannot execute shell scripts with the bat command? Using batch files isn't an option.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-23852) slave builds repeatedly broken by "hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed"

2017-03-24 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-23852  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: slave builds repeatedly broken by "hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed"   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have a vague feeling that this problem occurs when there is more than one job running on the slave. If I have time, I will try to restrict the Windows slaves to one slot and see if this makes the problem go away. Maybe some of you can try this, too.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-23852) slave builds repeatedly broken by "hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed"

2017-03-23 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-23852  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: slave builds repeatedly broken by "hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed"   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Since we switched from freestyle jobs to pipelines (a very decision if you as me), about every second jobs fails with this error which makes Windows slaves pretty much unusable. It has never been a problem before, therefore my guess is that is has something to do with pipelines. Here's a strack trace, which always looks the same: 

 
java.io.IOException: remote file operation failed: C:\Users\jenkins\slave\workspace\g.knime.product.full_master-6YACVMZPMCFFZKR6NNQZEQAJGOVHWVVS2MSXJGRRFPLNAY2WNRWQ at hudson.remoting.Channel@2eed4a92:Channel to /xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed
	at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:992)
	at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:974)
	at hudson.FilePath.mkdirs(FilePath.java:1157)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.CoreStep$Execution.run(CoreStep.java:77)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.CoreStep$Execution.run(CoreStep.java:65)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.SynchronousNonBlockingStepExecution$1$1.call(SynchronousNonBlockingStepExecution.java:49)
	at hudson.security.ACL.impersonate(ACL.java:221)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.SynchronousNonBlockingStepExecution$1.run(SynchronousNonBlockingStepExecution.java:46)
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: hudson.remoting.ChannelClosedException: channel is already closed
	at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:604)
	at hudson.remoting.Request.call(Request.java:130)
	at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:821)
	at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:985)
	... 12 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected EOF while receiving the data from the channel. FIFO buffer has been already closed
	at org.jenkinsci.remoting.nio.NioChannelHub$3.run(NioChannelHub.java:617)
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
	at hudson.remoting.SingleLaneExecutorService$1.run(SingleLaneExecutorService.java:112)
	at jenkins.util.ContextResettingExecutorService$1.run(ContextResettingExecutorService.java:28)
	... 5 more
Caused by: org.jenkinsci.remoting.nio.FifoBuffer$CloseCause: Buffer close has been requested
	at org.jenkinsci.remoting.nio.FifoBuffer.close(FifoBuffer.java:426)
	at org.jenkinsci.remoting.nio.NioChannelHub$MonoNioTransport.closeR(NioChannelHub.java:332)
	at org.jenkinsci.remoting.nio.NioChannelHub.run(NioChannelHub.java:565)
	... 6 more 

 I'm happy to debug this further if someone tells me what to do.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-21 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42405  
 
 
  Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Thorsten Meinl  
 
 
Labels: 
 regression  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-05 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Logging  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-02 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After I figured out  how  to turn on more logging messages, I got this:{noformat}could not check C:\Users\jenkins\slave\workspace\r-WGI6TZZNQOBAAHSSLVRBWLNOVFN3FM5CSX5AJTOHIS4QEFKE2BPA@2java.io.IOException: Remote call on Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx failed at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:830) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness._isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:77) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness.isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:59) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.BourneShellScript$ShellController.exitStatus(BourneShellScript.java:198) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.check(DurableTaskStep.java:307) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.run(DurableTaskStep.java:276) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$LibC at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:98) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:91) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:153) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:50) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:336) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:94) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) at ..remote call to Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx(Native Method) at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1537) at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:253) at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:822) ... 12 more{noformat}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-02 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After I figured out to turn on more logging messages, I got this:{ { noformat} could not check C:\Users\jenkins\slave\workspace\r-WGI6TZZNQOBAAHSSLVRBWLNOVFN3FM5CSX5AJTOHIS4QEFKE2BPA@2java.io.IOException: Remote call on Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx failed at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:830) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness._isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:77) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness.isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:59) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.BourneShellScript$ShellController.exitStatus(BourneShellScript.java:198) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.check(DurableTaskStep.java:307) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.run(DurableTaskStep.java:276) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$LibC at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:98) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:91) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:153) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:50) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:336) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:94) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) at ..remote call to Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx(Native Method) at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1537) at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:253) at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:822) ... 12 more {noformat } }  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-02 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After I figured out to turn on more logging messages, I got this: {{could not check C:\Users\jenkins\slave\workspace\r-WGI6TZZNQOBAAHSSLVRBWLNOVFN3FM5CSX5AJTOHIS4QEFKE2BPA@2 java.io.IOException: Remote call on Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx failed at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:830) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness._isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:77) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness.isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:59) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.BourneShellScript$ShellController.exitStatus(BourneShellScript.java:198) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.check(DurableTaskStep.java:307) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.run(DurableTaskStep.java:276) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$LibC at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:98) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:91) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:153) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:50) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:336) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:94) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) at ..remote call to Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx(Native Method) at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1537) at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:253) at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:822) ... 12 more }}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-02 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-42405  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 After I figured out to turn on more logging messages, I got this:{{  could not check C:\Users\jenkins\slave\workspace\r-WGI6TZZNQOBAAHSSLVRBWLNOVFN3FM5CSX5AJTOHIS4QEFKE2BPA@2java.io.IOException: Remote call on Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx failed at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:830) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness._isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:77) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness.isAlive(ProcessLiveness.java:59) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.BourneShellScript$ShellController.exitStatus(BourneShellScript.java:198) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.check(DurableTaskStep.java:307) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep$Execution.run(DurableTaskStep.java:276) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$LibC at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:98) at org.jenkinsci.plugins.durabletask.ProcessLiveness$Liveness.call(ProcessLiveness.java:91) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:153) at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:50) at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:336) at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:94) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) at ..remote call to Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx(Native Method) at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1537) at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:253) at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:822) ... 12 more}}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-16108) Option to use "last unstable" as fallback for "Upstream build which trigger" instead of only "last successful"

2017-03-01 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-16108  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Option to use "last unstable" as fallback for "Upstream build which trigger" instead of only "last successful"
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Any estimate when this will be fixed? In my opinion this is even a bug, because in Jenkins terms "successful" means stable or unstable (but not failed). However, the plug-in will only copy from the last stable job which may lead to unexpected results.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-42407) Mailer step in pipelines doesn't send mails

2017-03-01 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42407  
 
 
  Mailer step in pipelines doesn't send mails   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 pipeline  
 
 
Created: 
 2017/Mar/01 4:10 PM  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.32.2 on Linux  Pipeline 2.5  Pipeline Groovy 2.27  Pipeline Job 2.10  Pipeline Nodes and Processes 2.9  Pipeline Stage 2.2  Pipeline Stage 2.9  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Thorsten Meinl  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Sending mails from pipeline jobs via the Mailer class doesn't work. Using this snippet 

 
step([$class: 'Mailer', notifyEveryUnstableBuild: true, recipients: 'me@mail'])
 

 just doesn't do anything. No error reported in the job, no errors in any logs and no mails delivered to the mail server. Sending mail at the end of freestyle jobs works as expected which indicates that this is a pipeline bug.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-42405) Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves

2017-03-01 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-42405  
 
 
  Lots of remote channel errors with pipelines and Windows slaves   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Unassigned  
 
 
Components: 
 pipeline  
 
 
Created: 
 2017/Mar/01 4:06 PM  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.32.2  Linux master, Windows slave  Pipeline 2.5  Pipeline Groovy 2.27  Pipeline Job 2.10  Pipeline Nodes and Processes 2.9  Pipeline Stage 2.2  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Thorsten Meinl  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have two Windows slaves. When I run pipeline jobs on these slaves I get tons of error messages 

 
Cannot contact Windows7: java.io.IOException: Remote call on Channel to /172.17.xxx.xxx failed
 

 Yet the job finishes successfully. A minimal example to reproduce is 

 
node('windows') {
stage('Test') {
sh '''
for ((i=0; i < 100; i++)); do
echo $i
sleep 1
done
'''
}
}
 

 Executing the same shell script via a freestyle job on the same Windows slave works without any error messages therefore it's very likely that this is a bug in the pipeline implementation. Restarting slaves and master doesn't change anything. I also couldn't find any more information in log files (or I am 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2017-02-22 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As a workaround I'm currently using the following function:  { quote code:java }def multiSlotNode(String label, int slots = 1, Closure body) { if (slots == 1) {  node(label) { body() } } else if (slots > 1) {  node(label) { multiSlotNode(env.NODE_NAME, slots - 1, body) } } else {  throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of slots must be greather than zero") }}{ quote code }Use as  _multiSlotNode  {code:java}multiSlotNode ('desired-node-label', 2) { doSomething } _ {code:java}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2017-02-22 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As a workaround I'm currently using the following function:{code:java}def multiSlotNode(String label, int slots = 1, Closure body) { if (slots == 1) {  node(label) { body() } } else if (slots > 1) {  node(label) { multiSlotNode(env.NODE_NAME, slots - 1, body) } } else {  throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of slots must be greather than zero") }}{code}Use as {code:java}  multiSlotNode('desired-node-label', 2) { doSomething }  {code:java}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2017-02-22 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As a workaround I'm currently using the following function:  { { quote} def multiSlotNode(String label, int slots = 1, Closure body) { if (slots == 1) {  node(label) { body() } } else if (slots > 1) {  node(label) { multiSlotNode(env.NODE_NAME, slots - 1, body) } } else {  throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of slots must be greather than zero") }}  {quote } } Use as  {{multiSlotNode  _multiSlotNode ('desired-node-label', 2) { doSomething } }} _  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41940) Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies

2017-02-22 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-41940  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Pipeline stages should be configurable with a weight property, corresponding to the number of executors the stage occupies   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 As a workaround I'm currently using the following function: {{ def multiSlotNode(String label, int slots = 1, Closure body) { if (slots == 1) { node(label)  { body() }  } else if (slots > 1) { node(label)  { multiSlotNode(env.NODE_NAME, slots - 1, body) }  } else  { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of slots must be greather than zero") } } }} Use as {{ multiSlotNode('desired-node-label', 2)  { doSomething } }}  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-37718) Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building

2017-02-10 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-37718  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 No, there are good reason to split this into multiple jobs. One being that the support for multiple SCM checkouts from Git in Jenkins completely sucks. And maintainability. Every job has a Jenkinsfile that is about a hundred lines long. Combining it into one job makes it unreadable. Also the parallel step mixes the output of all nodes which renders it close to unreadable. Also being able to start the intermediate jobs individually isn't possible with one single pipeline job.  Shall I continue ;-)  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-37718) Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building

2017-02-10 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-37718  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 No, there are good reason to split this into multiple jobs. One being that the support for multiple SCM checkouts from Git in Jenkins completely sucks. And maintainability. Every job has a Jenkinsfile that is about a hundred lines long. Combining it into one job makes it unreadable. Also the parallel step mixes the output of all nodes which renders it close to unreadable. Shall I continue   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-37718) Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building

2017-02-07 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-37718  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Block Pipeline job while upstream or downstream projects are building   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I also don't see how Lockable Resources may replace this very useful functionality of FreeStyle jobs. Is there any reason, why you don't want to implement this for Pipeline jobs? Our use case is a chain of jobs such as  B-C-D / \ A - E - F - G G combines the results from D and F and it doesn't make sense if either D or F (or any of their upstream jobs) are currently executing, because the current results will be replaced quite soon by new results. It doesn't hurt but it's a huge waste of resources.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41710) Annotate test results with a test run name

2017-02-04 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-41710  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Annotate test results with a test run name   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This is a very good idea and makes replacing matrix jobs with (parallel) pipelines easier.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-41415) SCM changes of multiple checkouts via pipeline not shown correctly

2017-01-25 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-41415  
 
 
  SCM changes of multiple checkouts via pipeline not shown correctly   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Bug  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Mark Waite  
 
 
Components: 
 git-plugin, pipeline  
 
 
Created: 
 2017/Jan/25 9:47 AM  
 
 
Environment: 
 Jenkins 2.32.1  Pipeline 2.4  Git 3.0.1  
 
 
Priority: 
  Major  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Thorsten Meinl  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 With the new pipeline feature it's easily possible to check out several repositories in one job. This works as expected, but the "Changes" page of the job is completely empty. Also there are several "Git Build Data" links on the left (one for every checked out repository it seems) but all point to the same URL which (in our case) only shows the information for the first repository. This means you have no idea what you have actually built with a job unless you have a look at the console output, find all revision IDs and check the log of every repository manually.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-9146) Allow archiving of empty directories to be enabled/disabled

2016-11-12 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-9146  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Allow archiving of empty directories to be enabled/disabled   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Another example where archiving empty directories is crucial: I have set up jobs that split a large Git repository into several smaller ones. I want to archive the results. However, empty folders such as "branches" or "refs" and not archive resulting in a broken Git repository (git commands simply don't recognize it as such any more).  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-22 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl resolved as Cannot Reproduce 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
It seems the automatic "restart" that Jenkins performs after updating extensions isn't enough. After I completely restarted the service on the OS level, tokens are again replaced. Sorry for the noise. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
  Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Thorsten Meinl 
 
 
 

Status:
 
 Open Resolved 
 
 
 

Resolution:
 
 Cannot Reproduce 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-15 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes, I restarted after the update (Jenkins does this automatically). If you given me some pointers where to start looking, I can give it a try. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-15 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl edited a comment on  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins configuration files  are attached.BTW, if you perform a search on the internet for "$BUILD_STATUS" and "Jenkins" you will find quite a lot of hits that seem to indicate the same or a similar issue. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-15 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl updated an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
  Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jenkins configuration files 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Thorsten Meinl 
 
 
 

Attachment:
 
 hudson.plugins.emailext.ExtendedEmailPublisher.xml 
 
 
 

Attachment:
 
 config.xml 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-15 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl commented on  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes, it's on the latest version 1.12.1. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [email-ext-plugin] (JENKINS-34267) Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more

2016-04-15 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-34267 
 
 
 
  Email-ext doesn'r replace all tokens any more  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Bug 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 
 Alex Earl 
 
 
 

Components:
 

 email-ext-plugin 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 2016/Apr/15 7:57 AM 
 
 
 

Environment:
 

 Jenkins 1.651.1  email-ext-plugin 2.41.3 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Major 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 Thorsten Meinl 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
After updating to version 2.41.3, tokens in email subjects are not replaced any more. Instead they are sent plain: 
$PROJECT_NAME - Build # 137 - $BUILD_STATUS! 
After downgrading to 2.40.5 they are again replaced correctly. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 

[JIRA] [junit-plugin] (JENKINS-29138) JUnit analysis fails with OOM (regression)

2015-06-30 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Thorsten Meinl created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-29138 
 
 
 
  JUnit analysis fails with OOM (regression)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Bug 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 

 Unassigned 
 
 
 

Components:
 

 junit-plugin 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 30/Jun/15 8:24 AM 
 
 
 

Environment:
 

 Ubuntu 12.04, 64bit 
 
 
 

Labels:
 

 junit 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Major 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 Thorsten Meinl 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Since the upgrade to Jenkins 1.609.1 (LTS) Jenkins needs significantly more memory parsing the JUnit results. We have slaves running with 512MB heap and there were no problems parsing all results in the previous version. Right after the update they are not not able to parse the same results with 1.5GB! I also checked and the largest XML result file is 17MB (and we don't keep large stdout/stderr). This looks like a serious regression in this version of Jenkins. Here's the relevant stack trace: Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2367) at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.expandCapacity(AbstractStringBuilder.java:130) at 

[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-25390) New design breaks build history layout

2014-11-04 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)














































Thorsten Meinl
 commented on  JENKINS-25390


New design breaks build history layout















This also affects a few others parts of the GUI, e.g. the JUnit results page or the build processor panel on the front page. In some cases the layout gets better if you make the browser windows smaller. Should I open separate issues for each of them?



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-25390) New design breaks build history layout

2014-10-31 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)














































Thorsten Meinl
 created  JENKINS-25390


New design breaks build history layout















Issue Type:


Bug



Assignee:


Unassigned


Attachments:


broken_layout.png, ok.png



Components:


core



Created:


31/Oct/14 8:48 AM



Description:


With the new design the build history panel on the left of each job is broken. It's rendered too small so that build date and build size are wrapped which looks darn-ugly. Funnily, if I make the browser window smaller it suddenly looks correct (see attached screenshots).
Apart from that the new design seems to needs considerably more space, probably because the font size is larger (or because of the changed font). This is a drawback in my opinion.




Environment:


Jenkins 1.580.1 (LTS), Linux, Firefox 24.8




Project:


Jenkins



Priority:


Minor



Reporter:


Thorsten Meinl

























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-25390) New design breaks build history layout

2014-10-31 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)














































Thorsten Meinl
 updated  JENKINS-25390


New design breaks build history layout
















Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.





Change By:


Thorsten Meinl
(31/Oct/14 8:52 AM)




Attachment:


duration_column_too_small.png



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-25390) New design breaks build history layout

2014-10-31 Thread thors...@meinl.bnv-bamberg.de (JIRA)














































Thorsten Meinl
 updated  JENKINS-25390


New design breaks build history layout
















Another issue: the duration column in the tests view is also too small, see screenshot. It may be due to the german translation but still this was not problem before.





Change By:


Thorsten Meinl
(31/Oct/14 8:52 AM)




Attachment:


duration_column_too_small.png



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.