[JIRA] (JENKINS-29390) Parameterization for Docker Container configuration.

2019-04-24 Thread nicolas.del...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Nicolas De Loof assigned an issue to Unassigned  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-29390  
 
 
  Parameterization for Docker Container configuration.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Nicolas De Loof  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Nicolas De Loof  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-29390) Parameterization for Docker Container configuration.

2016-06-23 Thread antoniobe...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Antonio Beyah commented on  JENKINS-29390  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Parameterization for Docker Container configuration.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Can we also make a similar consideration for volumes? I would like the volumes mounted for workspace and target paths to be configurable.  The current (default) is great for most cases but there are areas where it falls apart, namely places where the same directories are used by the job running inside the container and are also mounted. For example, JENKINS_HOME is mounted inside the container, but I have an RPM that is building/installing a RPM that is creating those directories (the jenkins rpm), so in this case I would like the JENKINS_HOME to not match the paths in the rpm.  In a sense, in some instances I want the file system to be completely isolated from the host machine. I'm thinking it would be nice if under 'volumes' the default was to have the ones that are currently hardcoded, but to allow the volumes to be completely configurable. I'm curious to your thoughts on that, if you are open to it I may be able to throw a PR together that adds that support. If you want I can open a separate issue to discuss configurable volumes, just let me know.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.