[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-10 Thread juliehir...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Julie Shamji updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-58403  
 
 
  Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Julie Shamji  
 
 
Comment: 
 This has been marked as a duplicate, Could you tell me which record this is a duplicate of so I can keep track of its progress please?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.6549.1562753580142%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-10 Thread juliehir...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Julie Shamji commented on  JENKINS-58403  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This has been marked as a duplicate, Could you tell me which record this is a duplicate of so I can keep track of its progress please?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.6547.1562753520124%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-10 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ulli Hafner commented on  JENKINS-58403  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I think I need to find some time to port https://github.com/jenkinsci/analysis-core-plugin/pull/49 to the new API.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.6545.1562753400158%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-10 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ulli Hafner closed an issue as Duplicate  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-58403  
 
 
  Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Ulli Hafner  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Duplicate  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.6543.1562753341281%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-10 Thread juliehir...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Julie Shamji commented on  JENKINS-58403  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I can confirm that there were no whitespace changes on this line. There were new lines added within 5 lines of this change.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.6513.1562752981222%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-09 Thread ullrich.haf...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ulli Hafner commented on  JENKINS-58403  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 The comparison is using a two pass algorithm: in the first pass the properties of the warning are compared. If one property differs (e.g., line number) then this warning is moved to a second pass. In the second pass, the actual code is compared. This is currently done by checking the context above and below the warning (5 lines). Did the content (or whitespace) in the surrounding lines change?  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.200528.1562672143000.5906.1562703480199%40Atlassian.JIRA.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-58403) Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line

2019-07-09 Thread juliehir...@hotmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Julie Shamji created an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-58403  
 
 
  Issue marked as new when the issue did exist in a previous build but on a different line   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Issue Type: 
  Improvement  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Ulli Hafner  
 
 
Components: 
 warnings-ng-plugin  
 
 
Created: 
 2019-07-09 11:35  
 
 
Priority: 
  Minor  
 
 
Reporter: 
 Julie Shamji  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 We have an issue which existed for a while, which is logged as which shows the issue is 24 days old:   
 

 
 
RequestAccessMergeProcessor.java:432 
com.unisys.holmes2.h2ng.workflow.business.requestaccess 
Metrics 
JavaNCSSCheck 
Normal 
24 
 

 
   In the next build, a change has been made to this file which moved this method to a new line, but the method remained unchanged. It is now logged as:   
 

 
 
RequestAccessMergeProcessor.java:434