[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2020-03-13 Thread tomree...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tom Reed edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have been battling a similar issue.My situation is that the P4_CLIENT I build uses the variables "jenkins-${JOB_NAME}-\{NODE_NAME}"The NODE_NAME is wrong a few times a night with 6 parallel builds on 6 different nodes. About 40-050 builds are queued a night, and the wrong P4_CLIENT is causing the wrong  P$_CHANGELIST  P4_CHANGELIST  to be reported.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.6941.1584123120180%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2020-03-13 Thread tomree...@gmail.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Tom Reed commented on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 I have been battling a similar issue. My situation is that the P4_CLIENT I build uses the variables "jenkins-${JOB_NAME}-{NODE_NAME}" The NODE_NAME is wrong a few times a night with 6 parallel builds on 6 different nodes. About 40-050 builds are queued a night, and the wrong P4_CLIENT is causing the wrong P$_CHANGELIST to be reported.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.6938.1584123060290%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2020-03-11 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth commented on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 There seems to be underlying issues with the executor number in Jenkins core.  JENKINS-48882, JENKINS-24679, JENKINS-7357, JENKINS-4756. Our testing confirms that we calculate the correct executor number for the client, however the environment variable EXECUTOR_NUMBER set by Jenkins (hudson.model.Computer) seems always be incorrect with concurrent execution. Closing this issue as we have resolved the client name part of the issue. Please raise this against Jenkins core if you require the EXECUTOR_NUMBER to be fixed.  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.5153.1583924580421%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2020-03-11 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth closed an issue as Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60213  
 
 
  P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Matthew Smeeth  
 
 
Status: 
 Open Closed  
 
 
Resolution: 
 Fixed  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.5155.1583924580458%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2020-02-12 Thread ra...@niederloehner.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Ralph Ndl updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60213  
 
 
  P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Ralph Ndl  
 
 
Labels: 
 P4_A  P4_CLIENT  P4_VERIFY  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.8212.1581524580217%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue, Looking into it further, it looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script. I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get:  {code:java}Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME}${JOB_NAME}${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/...Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY[Pipeline] Start of Pipeline[Pipeline] nodeRunning on Jenkins in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] stage[Pipeline] { (testStage)[Pipeline] script[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] dirRunning in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] checkoutExecutor no at runtime:0  Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin .. .. .. + concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh =  WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECT P4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECT EXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number =  ERROR - Bad Workspace ERROR - Bad P4 Client .. ..Finished: FAILURE{code} I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect.I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue. It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113]. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace. [~jbateman], when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113] in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 
  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue, Looking into it further, it looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script. I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get:  {code:java}Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME}${JOB_NAME}${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/... Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY  [Pipeline] Start of Pipeline  [Pipeline]  nodeRunning  nodeRunning  on Jenkins in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject  [Pipeline] {  [Pipeline] stage  [Pipeline] { (testStage)  [Pipeline] script  [Pipeline] {  [Pipeline]  dirRunning  dirRunning  in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test  [Pipeline] {  [Pipeline]  checkoutExecutor  checkoutExecutor  no at runtime:0  Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin .. .. .. + concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh =  WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECT P4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECT EXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number =ERROR - Bad Workspace ERROR - Bad P4 Client .. ..Finished: FAILURE{code} I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect.I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue. It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113]. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace. [~jbateman], when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113] in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue, Looking into it further, it looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script. I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get:  {code:java}Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME}${JOB_NAME}${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/...Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY[Pipeline] Start of Pipeline[Pipeline] nodeRunning on Jenkins in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] stage[Pipeline] { (testStage)[Pipeline] script[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] dirRunning in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] checkoutExecutor no at runtime:0  Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin .. .. .. + concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh =  WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECT P4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECT EXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number =ERROR - Bad WorkspaceERROR - Bad P4 Client .. ..Finished: FAILURE{code} I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect.I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue. It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113]. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace. [~jbateman], when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113] in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 
 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue,  and looking  Looking  into it further .  It , it  looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script. I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get: Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME}-${JOB_NAME}-${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/...Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY[Pipeline] Start of Pipeline[Pipeline] nodeRunning on [Jenkins|http://localhost:5003/computer/(master)/] in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] stage[Pipeline] { (testStage)[Pipeline] script[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] dirRunning in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] checkoutExecutor no at runtime:0 Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin..+ concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh= WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECTP4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECTEXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number=  *  **   * **  ERROR - Bad Workspace*** ERROR - Bad P4 ClientFinished: FAILURE  I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect.I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue. It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113]. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace. [~jbateman], when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113] in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

   

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth edited a comment on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue, Looking into it further, it looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script. I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get:   {code:java}  Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME} - ${JOB_NAME} - ${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/... Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY[Pipeline] Start of Pipeline[Pipeline] nodeRunning on  [ Jenkins |http://localhost:5003/computer/(master)/]  in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] stage[Pipeline] { (testStage)[Pipeline] script[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] dirRunning in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] checkoutExecutor no at runtime:0  Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin .. .. .. + concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh =  WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECT P4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECT EXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number =  *  **  ***   ERROR - Bad Workspace  ***  ERROR - Bad P4 Client .. ..  Finished: FAILURE {code}    I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect.I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue. It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113]. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace. [~jbateman], when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with [https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113] in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

 

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-24 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth commented on  JENKINS-60213  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
  Re: P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 Hi, I've written an automated test to reproduce this issue, and looking into it further.  It looks to me like the P4_CLIENT variable is actually correct, and it's actually the EXECUTOR NUMBER that is wrong in your script.   I can demonstrate this by putting an extra bit of debugging into the p4 plugin when running jobs. I have modified my build so that it outputs the executor number as the job is executing and this is what I get:   Obtained concurrentBuildsTest/jenkinsfile from p4-brunoCred-//depot/... //jenkins-${NODE_NAME}${JOB_NAME}${EXECUTOR_NUMBER}/... Running in Durability level: MAX_SURVIVABILITY[Pipeline] Start of Pipeline[Pipeline] nodeRunning on Jenkins in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] stage[Pipeline] { (testStage)[Pipeline] script[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] dirRunning in /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject/test[Pipeline] {[Pipeline] checkoutExecutor no at runtime:0  Extra debugging I've added to the p4 plugin .. .. .. + concurrentBuildsTest/script.sh =  WORKSPACE: /var/jenkins_home/workspace/concurrentBuildsTestProject < CORRECT P4_CLIENT: jenkins-master-concurrentBuildsTestProject-0  CORRECT EXECUTOR NUMBER: 1 < Wrong executor number =  
 
 
 
 
 
ERROR - Bad Workspace 
ERROR - Bad P4 Client .. .. 
  
  
 Finished: FAILURE I have run this several times and every time the job fails, the result is the same, the workspace and client are correct, and the executor number outputted by the script is incorrect. I'm theorising that this is because when builds are running concurrently, in between the sync and the running of the script, the executor number gets overridden by the other jobs, hence it ends up incorrect when the script runs. Therefore I don't think the script we're using is suitable for testing this issue.   It's worth noting I am using the latest changes which contains https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113. Which fixes an issue very similar to this, where the workspace was being set wrong. I believe this was why you were getting a different p4 client and workspace.   James Bateman, when available please can you retest your original scenario using a build with https://github.com/jenkinsci/p4-plugin/pull/113 in. As I suspect this may fix your issue.    
 

  
 
 
 
 

  

[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-19 Thread msme...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Matthew Smeeth assigned an issue to Matthew Smeeth  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60213  
 
 
  P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Matthew Smeeth  
 
 
Assignee: 
 Matthew Smeeth  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.13673.1576755540136%40Atlassian.JIRA.


[JIRA] (JENKINS-60213) P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant

2019-12-03 Thread kwi...@perforce.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title


 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
   
 Karl Wirth updated an issue  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 

 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-60213  
 
 
  P4CLIENT environment variable non-reentrant   
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
Change By: 
 Karl Wirth  
 
 
Summary: 
 P4 P4CLIENT  environment  variables  variable  non-reentrant  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 Add Comment  
 

  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)  
 
 

 
   
 

  
 

  
 

   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-issues/JIRA.203186.1574180065000.11473.1575393540572%40Atlassian.JIRA.