[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Title: Message Title Jesse Glick commented on JENKINS-15063 Re: support for multiple security realms with failover Would it be feasible to have a special security realm plugin that functions somewhat like pam, in the sense that it could be configured to call a number of other security modules? As noted above, not without a new API, which would best live in core, and calls to it from existing security realm plugins. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Title: Message Title Joshua Hoblitt edited a comment on JENKINS-15063 Re: support for multiple security realms with failover Would it be feasible to have a special security realm plugin that functions somewhat like pam, in the sense that it could be configured to call a number of other security modules? I realize this would require modified versions of the existing security realm plugins but perhaps it would be a way forward without an ( incompatible |any) core change. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Title: Message Title Joshua Hoblitt commented on JENKINS-15063 Re: support for multiple security realms with failover Would it be feasible to have a special security realm plugin that functions somewhat like pam, in the sense that it could be configured to call a number of other security modules? I realize this would require modified versions of the existing security realm plugins but perhaps it would be a way forward without an incompatible core change. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Title: Message Title Jesse Glick updated an issue Jenkins / JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover Not possible without new core APIs and rework of existing security realm plugins to use them. Change By: Jesse Glick Labels: api security Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Steve Taylor commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I would like to see this also. It would be especially useful for testing role security and permissions with custom groups, test users, and machine accounts. I've recently placed a Jenkins farm with LDAP and it's authoritative for users, but the firm's use of groups is really quite simplistic. What might be nice is a number next to each choice signifying the order it checks and then a flag determining the "base case" default, e.g.: Order | Provider | Condition 0 | Active Directory | x 0 | Delegate to servlet container | x 2 | Jenkins’ own user database | NECESSARY 1 | LDAP | SUFFICIENT So the first provider it would check would be LDAP and that's sufficient to provide identity. If that fails it falls to the next which is the Jenkins' database and since that's necessary it must end there. The "x" on ADDS and container just means it doesn't matter what is selected there. I'm only using numbers because I think it would be easier to implement than drag and drop in order. And the numbers would be unique (save zero) so there are no ties between providers. Thanks! This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Kanstantsin Shautsou commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I'm not specialist on Atlassian products, but probably Crowd may do this, have you looked on it? This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
davidstrauss edited a comment on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I've put $500 toward adding this on FreedomSponsors.org: https://freedomsponsors.org/issue/546/support-for-multiple-security-realms-with-failover?show_sponsor=true&c=s This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
davidstrauss commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I've put $500 toward adding this on FreedomSponsors.org. This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Alex Ouzounis commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I would also be interested in this. Any activity ? This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Sunchan Lee commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I'm using active directory plugin for security realm. But I couldn't login and do anything about jenkins management when some problems occurred on our AD server. So multiple security realms should be supported I think. This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-15063) support for multiple security realms with failover
Sam He commented on JENKINS-15063 support for multiple security realms with failover I have similar requirement, e.g.: There are 2 user groups using 1 jenkins instance. one of the our group use the MS AD to perform authen, while the other group will use LDAP server. This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
