[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-19561) Unsafe & inefficient concurrency in XStream

2016-03-07 Thread db...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Daniel Beck updated an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-19561 
 
 
 
  Unsafe & inefficient concurrency in XStream  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Daniel Beck 
 
 
 

Labels:
 
 2.0 -rejected  performance threads workflow xstream 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-19561) Unsafe & inefficient concurrency in XStream

2015-10-05 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Jesse Glick updated an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Jenkins /  JENKINS-19561 
 
 
 
  Unsafe & inefficient concurrency in XStream  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Jesse Glick 
 
 
 

Labels:
 
 2.0 performance threads workflow xstream 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.2#64017-sha1:e244265) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-19561) Unsafe inefficient concurrency in XStream

2014-12-19 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)














































Jesse Glick
 updated  JENKINS-19561


Unsafe  inefficient concurrency in XStream
















Seems to be the cause of occasional test failures in Workflow (not known to occur in production, but might):


java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: null
	at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextEntry(LinkedHashMap.java:394)
	at java.util.LinkedHashMap$EntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:413)
	at java.util.LinkedHashMap$EntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:412)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.MapConverter.marshal(MapConverter.java:75)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:69)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:58)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller$1.convertAnother(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:84)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshallField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:223)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.writeField(RobustReflectionConverter.java:210)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter$2.visit(RobustReflectionConverter.java:182)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.PureJavaReflectionProvider.visitSerializableFields(PureJavaReflectionProvider.java:138)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.doMarshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:167)
	at hudson.util.RobustReflectionConverter.marshal(RobustReflectionConverter.java:108)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceMarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceMarshaller.java:69)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:58)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.convertAnother(TreeMarshaller.java:43)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeMarshaller.start(TreeMarshaller.java:82)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.marshal(AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.java:37)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.marshal(XStream.java:1026)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.marshal(XStream.java:1015)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.toXML(XStream.java:988)
	at hudson.XmlFile.write(XmlFile.java:178)
	at hudson.model.Run.save(Run.java:1915)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.support.steps.input.InputStepExecution.postSettlement(InputStepExecution.java:196)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.support.steps.input.InputStepExecution.proceed(InputStepExecution.java:149)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.parallel.ParallelStepTest$9.evaluate(ParallelStepTest.java:360)






Change By:


Jesse Glick
(19/Dec/14 3:50 PM)




Labels:


performancethreads
workflow
xstream



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[JIRA] [core] (JENKINS-19561) Unsafe inefficient concurrency in XStream

2014-12-16 Thread jgl...@cloudbees.com (JIRA)














































Jesse Glick
 updated  JENKINS-19561


Unsafe  inefficient concurrency in XStream
















Change By:


Jesse Glick
(16/Dec/14 6:17 PM)




Labels:


performancethreads
xstream



























This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Jenkins Issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.