Re: CFV: New jigsaw Committer: Jean-Francois Denise
Vote: yes On 9/13/2015 8:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: I hereby nominate Jean-Francois Denise to jigsaw Committer. Jean-Francois is a jdk9 Committer and has been contributing to the ongoing development of the jimage container format. He has also been focused recently on the link phase and jlink tool cited in JEP 261 [0]. He has more than 40 change-sets/contributions in the jigsaw/jake forest. Votes are due by September 26, 2015 8:00 PDT. Only current jigsaw Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. -Alan. [0] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261 [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
Re: jigsaw vs. jsr166 CVS
Alan, thanks for that pointer. I succeeded at building jsr166 and running tests with it after beating ant into submission. People *will* write code to distinguish between a pre-module and post-module JDK by inspecting the filesystem. Here's one implementation in ant: Then we can have conditional ant code like this: It's not just a matter of "porting to jigsaw". There seems to be no way of deploying jsr166 CVS as a directly deployable software artifact as we have been doing with -Xbootclasspath/p. To use -Xoverride, there must be an exploded directory. It would be convenient if -Xoverride was usable with an equivalent jar file (jsr166.jar). But y'all are trying to make module overriding possible, not convenient?! javadoc does not seem to have any support for -Xmodule, so I don't know how to fix the "docs" target. The fundamental disconnect is that from a developer point of view, jsr166 CVS contains an independently developed "module" with binary deployable artifacts, but jigsaw disagrees about its module-ness, and that can probably not be fixed because of circular dependencies between java.util.concurrent and the rest of java.base? On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 12/09/2015 00:30, Martin Buchholz wrote: > >> I tried adding -Xoverride, but it didn't help. >> >> You'll need to use javac -Xmodule:java.base to compile the classes, then > use -Xoverride at run-time. As it happens, there is an example that > compiles and uses an development version of CHM here: > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/quick-start#xoverride > > Hopefully it won't too much to get the build.xml to do this. > > -Alan >
Re: CFV: New jigsaw Committer: Jean-Francois Denise
Vote: yes Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > I hereby nominate Jean-Francois Denise to jigsaw Committer. > > Jean-Francois is a jdk9 Committer and has been contributing to the ongoing > development of the jimage container format. He has also been focused recently > on the link phase and jlink tool cited in JEP 261 [0]. He has more than 40 > change-sets/contributions in the jigsaw/jake forest. > > Votes are due by September 26, 2015 8:00 PDT. > > Only current jigsaw Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -Alan. > > [0] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261 > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
hg: jigsaw/jake/jdk: 3 new changesets
Changeset: 6b9fef847d06 Author:alanb Date: 2015-09-13 14:50 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/6b9fef847d06 Rename MixedModeTest.java to AddModsTest and extend coverage + test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/addmods/AddModsTest.java + test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/addmods/src/app/Main.java + test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/addmods/src/lib/jdk/lib/Util.java + test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/addmods/src/lib/module-info.java - test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/mixedmode/MixedModeTest.java - test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/mixedmode/src/app/Main.java - test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/mixedmode/src/lib/jdk/lib/Util.java - test/jdk/jigsaw/launcher/mixedmode/src/lib/module-info.java Changeset: 9d521fd83608 Author:alanb Date: 2015-09-13 15:35 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/9d521fd83608 AccessibleObject.setAccessible should not be final for compatibility reasons ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessibleObject.java ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Constructor.java ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java ! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Method.java Changeset: 0321cfe06fef Author:alanb Date: 2015-09-13 15:38 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/0321cfe06fef Merge - src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/nio/fs/GnomeFileTypeDetector.java - src/java.base/unix/native/libnio/fs/GnomeFileTypeDetector.c
Re: CFV: New jigsaw Committer: Jean-Francois Denise
Vote: yes
CFV: New jigsaw Committer: Jean-Francois Denise
I hereby nominate Jean-Francois Denise to jigsaw Committer. Jean-Francois is a jdk9 Committer and has been contributing to the ongoing development of the jimage container format. He has also been focused recently on the link phase and jlink tool cited in JEP 261 [0]. He has more than 40 change-sets/contributions in the jigsaw/jake forest. Votes are due by September 26, 2015 8:00 PDT. Only current jigsaw Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. -Alan. [0] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261 [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
Re: Retrieving PLATFORM_CLASS_PATH from file manager
On 12/09/2015 20:16, Jayaprakash Arthanareeswaran wrote: Hello experts, With JDK 9, some of JDT Core tests have started failing. The failing tests are in the JSR 199 area, where we test Eclipse's compiler in a mixed mode with Javac's StandardJavaFileManager. standardJavaFileManager.getLocation(StandardLocation.PLATFORM_CLASS_PATH); Until JDK 8, this used to return rt.jar and other jars but not anymore. I expected this to return the path to the bootmodules.jimage just like the system property "sun.boot.class.path". The proposal is to drop sun.boot.class.path, see the "Removed: Bootstrap class-path options" in JEP 261 [1]. It wasn't been useful since the changes for JEP 220 went into JDK 9. There are a few remaining pieces to be done in HotSpot before we can get there, mostly in the Serviceability Agent and the "Compile-The-World" built-in test. The issue is tracked by JDK-8131049 and JDK-8077209. To be consistent then I would think getLocation(PLATFORM_CLASS_PATH) would return an empty Iterable and a getLocation(SYSTEM_MODULE_PATH), or a Iterable variant, would return jrt:/. I'm sure Jon will reply on this issue and explain JRT_MARKER_FILE (which I suspect is what you are wondering about). -Alan [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261
Re: Jigsaw EA feedback on running an internal app
Yes, I'd only use these switches as a temporary solution just to get your projects compiling under jigsaw. Looks like the maven team have a handle on how to fix it: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201509.mbox/browser Regards, Chris On Sat, September 12, 2015 17:36, David M. Lloyd wrote: > On 09/12/2015 10:26 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/09/2015 16:52, Peter Levart wrote: >> >>> >>> Building the app with Maven doesn't work though. Maven compiler >>> module doesn't seem to be able to use the javac compiler API >>> correctly. Maven folks would have to look at it. >> I met Chris Newland today at an event, he was running into the same >> issue but found a workaround: >> >> https://twitter.com/chriswhocodes/status/642646126689132544 >> > > The forked mode lacks some features of the compiler API mode though; it > might not work for some projects, and I wouldn't recommend it for any kind > of long-term substitute in any event. > > -- > - DML > >
