Re: 8177474: Do not emit warnings when illegal access is allowed by --add-exports/--add-opens

[Mandy Chung]

> On Mar 23, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Alan Bateman  wrote:
> 
> I'd like to get jdk9/dev updated to align with the latest proposal for 
> --add-exports/--add-opens to not emit warnings. I've put the webrev with the 
> changes here:
> 
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177474/webrev/index.html

Looks good to me.

Mandy

Re: 8177474: Do not emit warnings when illegal access is allowed by --add-exports/--add-opens

[Chris Hegarty]

> On 23 Mar 2017, at 19:16, Alan Bateman  wrote:
> 
> I'd like to get jdk9/dev updated to align with the latest proposal for 
> --add-exports/--add-opens to not emit warnings. I've put the webrev with the 
> changes here:
> 
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177474/webrev/index.html

These changes look good to me Alan.

-Chris.

8177474: Do not emit warnings when illegal access is allowed by --add-exports/--add-opens

[Alan Bateman]

I'd like to get jdk9/dev updated to align with the latest proposal for 
--add-exports/--add-opens to not emit warnings. I've put the webrev with 
the changes here:


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177474/webrev/index.html

Some of this is just reverting some of the changes that were in JDK-8174823.

I've expanded the test coverage to cover cases where 
--permit-illegal-access is used with the precise options. These tests 
ensure that there isn't any warnings emitted when access is allowed via 
the precise options.


Once these changes are in jdk9/dev then I will pull them down to jake.

-Alan