[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-9150) Support Dictionary Unification with Concatenate
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17138462#comment-17138462 ] Daniel Nugent commented on ARROW-9150: -- Yes, looks like. Sorry, I think I searched for "concat" rather than "concatenate" when looking for an existing issue. > Support Dictionary Unification with Concatenate > --- > > Key: ARROW-9150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9150 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: C++ >Reporter: Daniel Nugent >Priority: Minor > > Seems to be supported through arrow to pandas conversions at the moment. I > *believe* the DictionaryUnifier could be leveraged for this. > Not sure if there are unintended consequences, but the NYI implies that this > is desired. Didn't see an open issue for it already. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-9150) Support Dictionary Unification with Concatenate
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17138160#comment-17138160 ] Joris Van den Bossche commented on ARROW-9150: -- Is this similar to ARROW-5336 ? > Support Dictionary Unification with Concatenate > --- > > Key: ARROW-9150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9150 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: C++ >Reporter: Daniel Nugent >Priority: Minor > > Seems to be supported through arrow to pandas conversions at the moment. I > *believe* the DictionaryUnifier could be leveraged for this. > Not sure if there are unintended consequences, but the NYI implies that this > is desired. Didn't see an open issue for it already. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
