[GitHub] [kafka] badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099: KAFKA-6733: Printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

2020-10-05 Thread GitBox


badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9099#issuecomment-703939623


   @bbejeck Do I need to do anything on this?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099: KAFKA-6733: Printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

2020-08-24 Thread GitBox


badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9099#issuecomment-679398619


   @bbejeck 
   
   It failed because it print the partition number as a single integer after 
the value. I moved the partition to be before the key (if printed) and value, 
and also added prefix "Partition:" to differentiate it from "Offset:".
   
   It's only printed if "print.partition=true".
   
   I will keep the tests as is then. ConsoleConsumerTest is a unit test for the 
class while DefaultMessageFormatterTest is more of an integration test.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099: KAFKA-6733: Printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

2020-08-23 Thread GitBox


badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9099#issuecomment-678834247


   @bbejeck 
   
   One question: As part of my PR, I add a new test for DefaultMessageFormatter 
class: core/src/test/scala/kafka/tools/DefaultMessageFormatterTest.scala
   
   But I found that there is another unit test that include a test for 
DefaultMessageFormatter class:
   
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/tools/ConsoleConsumerTest.scala#L501
   
   This was the cause of the system test failure yesterday. I changed the 
latter test to work with the updated DefaultMessageFormatter. But after 
thinking about it further, I should just delete the test for 
DefaultMessageFormatter in ConsoleConsumerTest.scala.
   
   What do you think?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099: KAFKA-6733: Printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

2020-08-22 Thread GitBox


badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9099#issuecomment-678641314


   @bbejeck Thank you for including the changes in the test. I've fixed the 
errors found by the test. Please test again.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099: KAFKA-6733: Printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

2020-08-12 Thread GitBox


badaiaqrandista commented on pull request #9099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9099#issuecomment-673156754


   @dajac Can you please re-review the changes I've made?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org