[GitHub] [kafka] dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: KAFKA-13142: Validate dynamic config alterations prior to forwarding them to the KRaft controller.
dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11141#issuecomment-892837165 @hachikuji @rajinisivaram since this build is green I’m fairly confident that dynamic config behavior hasn’t changed in a zk cluster. I am wondering if it is better to have buggy validation than no validation for KRaft brokers (assuming this is still buggy). Do either of you anticipate any problems with doing this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [kafka] dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: KAFKA-13142: Validate dynamic config alterations prior to forwarding them to the KRaft controller.
dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11141#issuecomment-892837165 @hachikuji @rajinisivaram since this build is green I’m fairly confident that dynamic config behavior hasn’t changed in a zk cluster. I am wondering if it is better to have buggy validation than no validation for KRaft brokers (assuming this is still buggy). Do either of you anticipate any problems with doing this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [kafka] dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: KAFKA-13142: Validate dynamic config alterations prior to forwarding them to the KRaft controller.
dielhennr commented on pull request #11141: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11141#issuecomment-892359084 @hachikuji @rajinisivaram since this build is green I’m fairly confident that dynamic configs in a zk cluster haven’t changed behavior. I am wondering if it would be better to have buggy validation than no validation at all for dynamic configs on KRaft brokers (assuming it is still buggy). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
