[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on pull request #13607: KAFKA-14916: Fix code that assumes transactional ID implies all records are transactional

2023-05-03 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #13607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13607#issuecomment-1533922748

   haven't updated the base in a while, so merging so that we can hopefully get 
a cleaner build.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on pull request #13607: KAFKA-14916: Fix code that assumes transactional ID implies all records are transactional

2023-04-28 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #13607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13607#issuecomment-1528168395

   One concern that came up when I was thinking about this PR is if we can have 
a produce request with more than one producer ID when we overflow epoch. 
Basically, I need to confirm we flush the accumulator.
   
   Alternatively, we can allow for more than one producer ID -- the main 
concern was that the verification could send the wrong one and get invalid 
producer ID mapping. Then we would have to retry. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on pull request #13607: KAFKA-14916: Fix code that assumes transactional ID implies all records are transactional

2023-04-19 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #13607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13607#issuecomment-151533

   I believe the connect mirror failures are known -- so no issues from the 
testing front.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [kafka] jolshan commented on pull request #13607: KAFKA-14916: Fix code that assumes transactional ID implies all records are transactional

2023-04-18 Thread via GitHub


jolshan commented on PR #13607:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13607#issuecomment-1513675548

   I already see the checkstyle issues created by my IDE so I will fix in a bit.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org