[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-28 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-828440406


   @ableegoldman , thanks for your great comments! If there's a best reviewer 
contest, I'd definitely vote for you! :) I've replied your 
`getUnassignedPartitions` comments. Please take a look. 
   
   Simply put, I have a further improvement to keep pretty much the same memory 
usage as before, and still have the performance improvement. I think we should 
keep this change. :) 
   
   I'd like to see if you have any thoughts. :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-20 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-816379867


   @ableegoldman , please help review this PR.  Thank you.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-20 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-823030049


   jenkins test results after my change: **(avg. 2 sec)**
   ```
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 1.8 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 2.2 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 2.2 sec | Passed
   ```
   the latest trunk test results: **(avg. 5.4 sec)**
   ```
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.12 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 6.3 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 4.4 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.12 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 5.7 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 6.5 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.13 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 6.3 sec | Passed
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription() | 3.6 sec | Passed
   ```
   
   BTW, all failed tests are flaky and unrelated:
   ```
   Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / 
kafka.server.RaftClusterTest.testCreateClusterAndCreateListDeleteTopic()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationSSLTest.testReplication()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationSSLTest.testReplicationWithEmptyPartition()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationSSLTest.testOneWayReplicationWithAutoOffsetSync()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testReplicationWithEmptyPartition()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testOneWayReplicationWithAutoOffsetSync()
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.integration.BlockingConnectorTest.testBlockInSourceTaskStop
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.integration.BlockingConnectorTest.testBlockInSourceTaskStart
   Build / JDK 15 and Scala 2.13 / 
org.apache.kafka.streams.integration.KTableKTableForeignKeyInnerJoinMultiIntegrationTest.shouldInnerJoinMultiPartitionQueryable
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationSSLTest.testReplication()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testReplication()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testReplicationWithEmptyPartition()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testOneWayReplicationWithAutoOffsetSync()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testReplication()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
org.apache.kafka.connect.mirror.integration.MirrorConnectorsIntegrationTest.testReplicationWithEmptyPartition()
   Build / JDK 8 and Scala 2.12 / 
kafka.server.RaftClusterTest.testCreateClusterAndCreateListDeleteTopic()
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-20 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-822975764


   @ableegoldman (cc. @guozhangwang)
   After completing the sticky general assignor improvement 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552), I started to think... why don't I 
re-use the same techniques to the constrained assignor. In this commit: 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509/commits/cd68d10b5030ecf9c1fd40b518322c0649a33ee4,
 I adopted the refactor 2 and 4 in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552 
to make the constrained assignor faster!
   
   After the PR: the `testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription` (1 
million partitions) will run from **~2600 ms
   down to ~1400 ms**, improves **46%** of performance, almost **2x faster**!!
   
   Let's what the result is in jenkins trunk build.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-19 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-822975764


   @ableegoldman (cc. @guozhangwang)
   After completing the sticky general assignor improvement 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552), I started to think... why don't I 
re-use the same techniques to the constrained assignor. In this commit: 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509/commits/cd68d10b5030ecf9c1fd40b518322c0649a33ee4,
 I adopted the refactor 2 and 4 in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552 
to make the constrained assignor faster!
   
   After the PR: the `testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription` (1 
million partitions) will run from **~2600 ms
   down to ~1400 ms**, improves **46%** of performance, almost 2x faster!!
   
   Let's what the result is in jenkins trunk build.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-19 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-822975764


   @ableegoldman (cc. @guozhangwang)
   After completing the sticky general assignor improvement 
(https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552), I started to think... why don't I 
re-use the same techniques to the constrained assignor. In this commit: 
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509/commits/cd68d10b5030ecf9c1fd40b518322c0649a33ee4,
 I adopted the refactor 2 and 4 in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10552 
to make the constrained assignor faster!
   
   After the PR: the `testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription` (1 
million partitions) will run from **~2600 ms
   down to ~1400 ms**, improves **46%** of performance!!
   
   Let's what the result is in jenkins trunk build.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [kafka] showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509: KAFKA-12464: enhance constrained sticky Assign algorithm

2021-04-09 Thread GitBox


showuon edited a comment on pull request #10509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10509#issuecomment-816379867


   @ableegoldman , please help review this PR. The 
testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithUniformSubscription test keeps pretty much the 
same performance as before, but keep the code simpler and cleaner. Thank you.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org